ABSTRACT
This work is an imaging review of spine after surgery with special regard to imaging modality in intervertebral disc pathology. Advances in imaging technology can be evaluated. Depending on the clinical question is asked to the radiologist, it is possible to evaluate post-operative patients with conventional radiology (X-ray), computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Main indications for each technique are analysed. Imaging is important in the diagnosis of many forms of spine pathology and plays a fundamental role in evaluating post-surgical effects of treatments, according to the imaging method which is used, both on spine and on its surrounding tissues (intervertebral discs, spinal cord, muscles and vessels).
Subject(s)
Discitis/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Contrast Media , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Discitis/surgery , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spinal Injuries/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , X-RaysABSTRACT
Although tumefactive multiple sclerosis is a well recognized variant of multiple sclerosis, prognostic uncertainty still exists about long term prognosis. The aim of this study was to estimate the occurrence and long term outcome of tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs) in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. We reviewed brain MRI of 443 patients referred to our MS clinic. All patients meeting the McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis and showing at least one TDL were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival in patient cohort were compared with control group without TDLs using a log-rank test. Seven cases with TDLs were identified (occurrence 1.58 %). Tumefactive demyelinating lesion recurrence was 16.6 %. Cumulative proportion of patients free from clinical relapse and from new T2 lesions was lower in the control group although not reaching statistical significance (30 vs 50 %; P = 0.666 and 21.7 vs 33.3 %; P = 0.761, respectively). Disability progression analysis showed a not significant trend towards lower probability of remaining progression free for TDL patients (50 vs 61 %; P = 0.295). Occurrence of tumefactive demyelinating lesions in our cohort was higher than those reported in other studies. Overall, TDLs were not predictive of poor outcome in terms of disability progression.
