ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a decreased ability to repair DNA damaged by UV radiation and the early development of cutaneous and ocular malignant neoplasms. Approximately 20% of patients with XP also develop progressive neurologic degeneration. OBSERVATIONS: We describe a boy who was found to have XP after a severe burn following minimal sun exposure. His maternal uncle, now age 20 years, had been diagnosed with XP after a similar sunburn in infancy. The uncle has the typical skin pigmentary findings of XP along with severe progressive neurologic involvement. Although the infant's parents were not known to be blood relatives, the infant and his affected uncle proved to be compound heterozygotes for the same 2 frameshift mutations in the XPA DNA repair gene (c.288delT and c.349_353del). After the diagnosis of XP in the infant, genealogic investigation identified a common Dutch ancestor for both of his grandfathers 5 generations back. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling families at risk for a rare inherited disease is not always straightforward. The sociocultural and demographic backgrounds of the families must be considered for evaluation of risk assessment.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Diseases/genetics , Pedigree , Skin Diseases/genetics , Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein/genetics , Xeroderma Pigmentosum/genetics , Adolescent , Facial Dermatoses/diagnosis , Facial Dermatoses/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Incidental Findings , Infant , Male , Mutation , Skin Diseases/pathology , Sunburn/diagnosis , Sunburn/genetics , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Xeroderma Pigmentosum/pathologyABSTRACT
CONTEXT: We recently showed that pre- and postcontrast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady-state (SPGR) was superior to conventional pre- and postcontrast T-1 weighted spin echo (SE) acquisition magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnostic evaluation of pituitary tumors in adult patients. OBJECTIVE: The present investigation assessed the use of SPGR vs. SE-MRI in the diagnostic evaluation of ACTH-secreting tumors in children and adolescents with Cushing disease. DESIGN: Data were analyzed retrospectively from a series of patients seen over 7 yr (1997-2004). SETTING: The setting for this study was a tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty children with Cushing disease (13 females and 17 males with a mean age of 12 +/- 3 yr) were studied. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Imaging results were compared with surgical and pathological findings and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients had microadenomas, and two had macroadenomas; the latter were identified by both MRI techniques. Precontrast SE and SPGR-MRI identified four and six of the microadenomas, respectively. Postcontrast SPGR-MRI identified the location of the tumor in 18 of 28 patients, whereas postcontrast SE-MRI identified the location and accurately estimated the size of the tumor in only five patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that conventional MRI, even with contrast enhancement, mostly failed to identify ACTH-secreting microadenomas in children and adolescents with Cushing disease. Postcontrast SPGR-MRI was superior to SE-MRI and should be used in addition to conventional SE-MRI in the pituitary evaluation of children and adolescents with suspected Cushing disease.
