Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Thromb Res ; 130(3): e158-62, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22682443

ABSTRACT

INR values may be either calculated with the ISI values supplied by thromboplastin manufacturers or are directly extrapolated from certified INR calibrator plasmas. We tested the principle of local INR calibration using INR calibrator plasmas (PT-Multi Calibrator, Siemens), two thromboplastin reagents (Neoplastin Plus, rabbit brain, Stago, coagulometer-specific ISI 1.31, and Innovin, recombinant human tissue factor, Siemens) and the same coagulometer (STA-R, Stago) in 100 patients on warfarin. Using a ISI value of 0.77 with Tomenson correction for Innovin (correction factor=1.09), INR values of patients were similar with the two reagents, with a bias of 0.03 INR units and no significant regression of the difference over the average INR by method comparison analysis. With the INR calibrator plasmas, INR values with Neoplastin Plus were lower than Innovin values with an average bias of 0.39 INR units and a significant regression of the difference over the average INR (r=-0.91). Significant bias (0.16 INR units, p<0.00001) and regression (r=-0.77) was also observed by comparison of Neoplastin Plus INRs with Innovin calibrated INRs. Based on a therapeutic INR interval of 2.0 to 3.5, discordance in warfarin dosing was approximately 3 times higher with INR calibration (27% vs 11%). Because of non commutability with fresh plasma samples, local INR calibration with lyophilized calibrator plasmas may not be valid for some reagent-instrument combinations.


Subject(s)
Indicators and Reagents/standards , International Normalized Ratio/instrumentation , International Normalized Ratio/standards , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Plasma/chemistry , Animals , Calibration/standards , Humans , Internationality , Rabbits
2.
Haematologica ; 87(10): 1074-80, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12368163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In vitro studies have shown that the rate of prothrombin activation is linearly related to the concentration of factor II (FII) in the assay system, suggesting a key role of prothrombin levels in the expression of the antithrombotic activity of oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). We investigated the in vivo relationship between prothrombin activation and vitamin K-dependent clotting factor levels during the early and steady phases of OAT in patients and in healthy volunteers. DESIGN AND METHODS: The changes in international normalizezd ratio (INR) and in the plasma levels of FVII, FX, FII, protein C (PC) and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1+2) induced by OAT were monitored over 9 days in 10 patients not on heparin starting warfarin after heart valve replacement (HVR) and in 9 healthy volunteers submitted to an 8-day course of warfarin treatment. FII and F1+2 plasma levels were also measured in 100 patients on stable oral anticoagulant treatment with INRs ranging from 1.2 to 6.84. RESULTS: Because HVR patients had subnormal FVII, FX and FII levels after surgery, INR values > 2.0 were attained already 24 hours after the first warfarin dose. In healthy volunteers, INR values greater than 2.0 were first observed after 72 hours. Nadir levels of FVII, PC, FX and FII were reached between 40 and 88 hours in HVR patients and between 72 and 192 hours in healthy volunteers. The FII apparent half-disappearance time (t/2) was 99 hours in HVR patients and 115 hours in healthy volunteers (p = ns). In HVR patients there was no normalization of initially elevated F1+2 levels until day 7 with an apparent t/2 of 132 hours. In healthy volunteers, a decrease to subnormal F1+2 levels was observed by day 8 of treatment (apparent t/2 = 107 hours). In both HVR patients and healthy volunteers, FII and PC levels were independent predictors of the changes in F1+2 levels (p = 0.0001). In patients on stable OAT, only FII levels were independent predictors of the variation in F1+2 levels (p = 0.0001). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: During the early phase of oral anticoagulant treatment in vivo prothrombin activation is a function of the balance between FII and PC levels and is not significantly prevented until nadir levels of FII are obtained. This provides an explanation for the requirement of overlapping heparin and oral anticoagulant treatment for at least 48 hours after the achievement of therapeutic INR values in patients with thromboembolic diseases. In addition, in vivo prothrombin activation is a function of FII levels rather than INR values also in patients on stable oral anticoagulant treatment.


Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Prothrombin/biosynthesis , Acenocoumarol/administration & dosage , Acenocoumarol/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Factor VII/biosynthesis , Factor X/biosynthesis , Female , Humans , Kinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/biosynthesis , Protein C/biosynthesis , Prothrombin/metabolism , Time Factors , Vitamin K/pharmacology , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...