Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 20(3): e1011942, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498530

ABSTRACT

Reducing contributions from non-neuronal sources is a crucial step in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity analyses. Many viable strategies for denoising fMRI are used in the literature, and practitioners rely on denoising benchmarks for guidance in the selection of an appropriate choice for their study. However, fMRI denoising software is an ever-evolving field, and the benchmarks can quickly become obsolete as the techniques or implementations change. In this work, we present a denoising benchmark featuring a range of denoising strategies, datasets and evaluation metrics for connectivity analyses, based on the popular fMRIprep software. The benchmark prototypes an implementation of a reproducible framework, where the provided Jupyter Book enables readers to reproduce or modify the figures on the Neurolibre reproducible preprint server (https://neurolibre.org/). We demonstrate how such a reproducible benchmark can be used for continuous evaluation of research software, by comparing two versions of the fMRIprep. Most of the benchmark results were consistent with prior literature. Scrubbing, a technique which excludes time points with excessive motion, combined with global signal regression, is generally effective at noise removal. Scrubbing was generally effective, but is incompatible with statistical analyses requiring the continuous sampling of brain signal, for which a simpler strategy, using motion parameters, average activity in select brain compartments, and global signal regression, is preferred. Importantly, we found that certain denoising strategies behave inconsistently across datasets and/or versions of fMRIPrep, or had a different behavior than in previously published benchmarks. This work will hopefully provide useful guidelines for the fMRIprep users community, and highlight the importance of continuous evaluation of research methods.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Artifacts , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiology , Brain Mapping/methods
2.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 64: 21-27, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004711

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an open-source pipeline to train neural networks to segment structures of interest from MRI data. The pipeline is tailored towards homogeneous datasets and requires relatively low amounts of manual segmentations (few dozen, or less depending on the homogeneity of the dataset). Two use-case scenarios for segmenting the spinal cord white and grey matter are presented: one in marmosets with variable numbers of lesions, and the other in the publicly available human grey matter segmentation challenge [1]. The pipeline is freely available at: https://github.com/neuropoly/multiclass-segmentation.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spinal Cord/diagnostic imaging , Animals , Callithrix , Gray Matter/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Models, Animal , Neural Networks, Computer , White Matter/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...