Analyzing Seismocardiogram Cycles to Identify the Respiratory Phases.

GOAL: the objective of this study was to develop a method to identify respiratory phases (i.e., inhale or exhale) of seismocardiogram (SCG) cycles. An SCG signal is obtained by placing an accelerometer on the sternum to capture cardiac vibrations. METHODS: SCGs from 19 healthy subjects were collected, preprocessed, segmented, and labeled. To extract the most important features, each SCG cycle was divided to equal-sized bins in time and frequency domains, and the average value of each bin was defined as a feature. Support vector machines was employed for feature selection and identification. The features were selected based on the total accuracy. The identification was performed in two scenarios: leave-one-subject-out (LOSO), and subject-specific (SS). RESULTS: time-domain features resulted in better performance. The time-domain features that had higher accuracies included the characteristic points correlated with aortic-valve opening, aortic-valve closure, and the length of cardiac cycle. The average total identification accuracies were 88.1% and 95.4% for LOSO and SS scenarios, respectively. CONCLUSION: the proposed method was an efficient, reliable, and accurate approach to identify the respiratory phases of SCG cycles. SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained from this study can be employed to enhance the extraction of clinically valuable information such as systolic time intervals.

Beat-by-Beat Quantification of Cardiac Cycle Events Detected From Three-Dimensional Precordial Acceleration Signals.

The vibrations produced by the cardiovascular system that are coupled to the precordium can be noninvasively detected using accelerometers. This technique is called seismocardiography. Although clinical applications have been proposed for seismocardiography, the physiology underlying the signal is still not clear. The relationship of seismocardiograms of on the back-to-front axis and cardiac events is fairly well known. However, the 3-D seismocardiograms detectable with modern accelerometers have not been quantified in terms of cardiac cycle events. A major reason for this might be the degree of intersubject variability observed in 3-D seismocardiograms. We present a method to quantify 3-D seismocardiography in terms of cardiac cycle events. First, cardiac cycle events are identified from the seismocardiograms, and then, assigned a number based on the location in which the corresponding event was found. 396 cardiac cycle events from 9 healthy subjects and 120 cardiac cycle events from patients suffering from atrial flutter were analyzed. Despite the weak intersubject correlation of the waveforms (0.05, 0.27, and 0.15 for the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively), the present method managed to find latent similarities in the seismocardiograms of healthy subjects. We observed that in healthy subjects the distribution of cardiac cycle event coordinates was centered on specific locations. These locations were different in patients with atrial flutter. The results suggest that spatial distribution of seismocardiographic cardiac cycle events might be used to discriminate healthy individuals and those with a failing heart.

Unified frame of reference improves inter-subject variability of seismocardiograms.

BACKGROUND: Seismocardiography is the noninvasive measurement of cardiac vibrations transmitted to the chest wall by the heart during its movement. While most applications for seismocardiography are based on unidirectional acceleration measurement, several studies have highlighted the importance of three-dimensional measurements in cardiac vibration studies. One of the main challenges in using three-dimensional measurements in seismocardiography is the significant inter-subject variability of waveforms. This study investigates the feasibility of using a unified frame of reference to improve the inter-subject variability of seismocardiographic waveforms. METHODS: Three-dimensional seismocardiography signals were acquired from ten healthy subjects to test the feasibility of the present method for improving inter-subject variability of three-dimensional seismocardiograms. The first frame of reference candidate was the orientation of the line connecting the points representing mitral valve closure and aortic valve opening in seismocardiograms. The second candidate was the orientation of the line connecting the two most distant points in the three dimensional seismocardiogram. The unification of the frame of reference was performed by rotating each subject's three-dimensional seismocardiograms so that the lines connecting the desired features were parallel between subjects. RESULTS: The morphology of the three-dimensional seismocardiograms varied strongly from subject to subject. Fixing the frame of reference to the line connecting the MC and AO peaks enhanced the correlation between the subjects in the y axis from 0.42 ± 0.30 to 0.83 ± 0.14. The mean correlation calculated from all axes increased from 0.56 ± 0.26 to 0.71 ± 0.24 using the line connecting the mitral valve closure and aortic valve opening as the frame of reference. When the line connecting the two most distant points was used as a frame of reference, the correlation improved to 0.60 ± 0.22. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that using a unified frame of reference is a promising method for improving the inter-subject variability of three-dimensional seismocardiograms. Also, it is observed that three-dimensional seismocardiograms seem to have latent inter-subject similarities, which are feasible to be revealed. Because the projections of the cardiac vibrations on the measurement axes differ significantly, it seems obligatory to use three-dimensional measurements when seismocardiogram analysis is based on waveform morphology.