Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 261(11): 1673-1682, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37406994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether an infiltrative block with liposomal bupivacaine was associated with less rescue analgesia administration and lower pain scores than a bupivacaine splash block after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. ANIMALS: Eligible dogs included those that were spayed as part of a veterinary teaching laboratory. Dogs were up to 7 years old and otherwise healthy. A total of 136 dogs were analyzed. METHODS: All dogs underwent ovariohysterectomy performed by veterinary students. Dogs received hydromorphone and acepromazine premedication, propofol induction, isoflurane maintenance, and an NSAID. Dogs were randomly allocated to receive either a splash block with standard bupivacaine or an infiltrative block with liposomal bupivacaine for incisional analgesia. Postoperatively, all dogs were assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Colorado State University-Canine Acute Pain Scale (CSU-CAPS) and Glasgow Composite Measures Pain Scale-Short Form (GCPS-SF). Dogs received rescue analgesia with buprenorphine if they scored ≥ 2 on the CSU-CAPS scale. RESULTS: Dogs that received liposomal bupivacaine had a significantly lower incidence of (P = .04) and longer time to (P = .03) administration of rescue analgesia. There was an overall time-averaged significant difference between groups for CSU-CAPS (P = .049) and GCPS-SF scores (P = .015), with dogs in the bupivacaine group being more likely to have an elevated pain score at some point for both scales. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of liposomal bupivacaine in an infiltrative block may decrease the need for rescue analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy compared to a bupivacaine splash block.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Dog Diseases , Pain, Postoperative , Animals , Dogs , Female , Analgesia/veterinary , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Hysterectomy/veterinary , Ovariectomy/veterinary , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/veterinary , Random Allocation
3.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 250(12): 1413-1418, 2017 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569640

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of dogs hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) with serum antibody titers against canine distemper virus (CDV) and canine parvovirus (CPV). DESIGN Prospective observational study. ANIMALS 80 dogs. PROCEDURES Dogs hospitalized in an ICU for > 12 hours between February 1 and June 1, 2015, that had at least 0.25 mL of serum left over from diagnostic testing were eligible for study inclusion. Dogs with serum antibody titers > 1:32 (as determined by serum neutralization) and > 1:80 (as determined by hemagglutination inhibition) were considered seropositive for CDV and CPV, respectively. The date of last vaccination was obtained from the medical record of each dog. RESULTS Of the 80 dogs, 40 (50%) and 65 (81%) dogs were seropositive for CDV and CPV, respectively. Of the 40 dogs that were seronegative for CDV, 27 had been vaccinated against CDV within 3 years prior to testing. Of the 15 dogs that were seronegative for CPV, 3 had been vaccinated against CPV within 3 years prior to testing. Ten dogs were seronegative for both CDV and CPV. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated the prevalence of dogs hospitalized in an ICU that were seropositive for CDV and CPV was lower than expected given the high vaccination rate reported for dogs. Although the antibody titer necessary to prevent disease caused by CDV or CPV in critically ill dogs is unknown, adherence to infectious disease control guidelines is warranted when CDV- or CPV-infected dogs are treated in an ICU.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Distemper Virus, Canine/immunology , Distemper/prevention & control , Parvoviridae Infections/veterinary , Parvovirus/immunology , Animals , Distemper/blood , Distemper/epidemiology , Distemper/virology , Dogs , Female , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Parvoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Parvoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Texas/epidemiology , Vaccination/veterinary
4.
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc ; 44(1): 25-31, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18175796

ABSTRACT

A medication error resulted in two kittens being treated with azathioprine (12 and 12.5 mg/kg) instead of azithromycin for 2 weeks. On clinical examination, the kittens were febrile, weak, and had oronasal hemorrhage. Complete blood cell counts indicated severe bone marrow suppression. Treatment consisted of multiple transfusions, antibiotics, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. One of the kittens responded to therapy and had a complete recovery. The other kitten was treated for 40 days with no clinical response before dying. Both kittens also contracted Mycoplasma hemofelis infection from a contaminated blood transfusion.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/veterinary , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Cat Diseases/chemically induced , Medication Errors , Anemia, Aplastic/chemically induced , Anemia, Aplastic/therapy , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Cat Diseases/therapy , Cats , Erythrocyte Transfusion/veterinary , Female , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...