Duration of viral infectiousness and correlation with symptoms and diagnostic testing in non-hospitalized adults during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection: A longitudinal cohort study

BackgroundGuidelines for SARS-CoV-2 have relied on limited data on duration of viral infectiousness and correlation with COVID-19 symptoms and diagnostic testing. MethodsWe enrolled ambulatory adults with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and performed serial measurements of COVID-19 symptoms, nasal swab viral RNA, nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) antigens, and replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 by culture. We determined average time from symptom onset to a first negative test result and estimated risk of infectiousness, as defined by a positive viral culture. ResultsAmong 95 adults, median [interquartile range] time from symptom onset to first negative test result was 9 [5] days, 13 [6] days, 11 [4] days, and >19 days for S antigen, N antigen, viral culture growth, and viral RNA by RT-PCR, respectively. Beyond two weeks, viral cultures and N antigen titers were rarely positive, while viral RNA remained detectable among half (26/51) of participants tested 21-30 days after symptom onset. Between 6-10 days from symptom onset, N antigen was strongly associated with viral culture positivity (relative risk=7.61, 95% CI: 3.01-19.2), whereas neither viral RNA nor symptoms were associated with culture positivity. During the 14 days following symptom onset, presence of N antigen (adjusted relative risk=7.66, 95% CI: 3.96-14.82), remained strongly associated with viral culture positivity, regardless of COVID-19 symptoms. ConclusionsMost adults have replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 for 10-14 after symptom onset, and N antigen testing is a strong predictor of viral infectiousness. Within two weeks from symptom onset, N antigen testing, rather than absence of symptoms or viral RNA, should be used to safely discontinue isolation. FundingBill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Antigen concentration, viral load, and test performance for SARS-CoV-2 in multiple specimen types

The relationship between N-antigen concentration and viral load within a specimen and across different specimens is essential for interpretation of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) clinical performance in different use cases. A prospective study was conducted in Porto Velho, Brazil, to investigate RDT performance in different specimen types as a function of the correlation between antigen concentration and viral load. The study included 214 close contacts with recent exposures to confirmed cases, aged 12 years and older and with various levels of vaccination. Antigen concentration was measured in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), anterior nares swab (ANS), and saliva specimens. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR was conducted on the NPS and saliva specimens, and two RDTs were conducted on ANS and one on saliva. Antigen concentration correlated with viral load when measured in the same specimen type but not across specimen types. Antigen levels were higher in symptomatic cases compared to asymptomatic/oligosymptomatic cases and lower in saliva compared to NPS and ANS samples. Discordant results between the RDTs conducted on ANS and the RT-PCR on NPS were resolved by antigen concentration values. The analytical limit-of-detection of RDTs can be used to predict the performance of the tests in populations for which the antigen concentration is known. The antigen dynamics across different sample types observed in SARS-CoV-2 disease progression support use of RDTs in nasal samples. Given lower antigen concentrations in saliva, tests using saliva is expected to require improved analytical sensitivity to achieve clinical sensitivity similar to testing of nasal samples.

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 VOC neutralization and novel mAb reveal protection against Omicron

To evaluate SARS-CoV-2 variants we isolated SARS-CoV-2 temporally during the pandemic starting with first appearance of virus in the Western hemisphere near Seattle, WA, USA, and isolated each known major variant class, revealing the dynamics of emergence and complete take-over of all new cases by current Omicron variants. We assessed virus neutralization in a first-ever full comparison across variants and evaluated a novel monoclonal antibody (Mab). We found that convalescence greater than 5-months provides little-to-no protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccination enhances immunity against variants with the exception of Omicron BA.1, and paired testing of vaccine sera against ancestral virus compared to Omicron BA.1 shows that 3-dose vaccine regimen provides over 50-fold enhanced protection against Omicron BA.1 compared to a 2-dose regimen. We also reveal a novel Mab that effectively neutralizes Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants over clinically-approved Mabs. Our observations underscore the need for continued vaccination efforts, with innovation for vaccine and Mab improvement, for protection against variants of SARS-CoV-2. SummaryWe isolated SARS-CoV-2 temporally starting with emergence of virus in the Western hemisphere. Neutralization analyses across all variant lineages show that vaccine-boost regimen provides protection against Omicron BA.1. We reveal a Mab that protects against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants.

Performance study of a point-of-care antigen test during the SARS-CoV-2 Delta to Omicron variant transition in the USA

IntroductionConcerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of diagnostic antigen testing for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant. We compared the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test between symptomatic participants recruited prospectively during the Delta to Omicron variant transition in the USA. MethodsTwo paired anterior nasal swabs were collected from each participant (adults and children) within 12 days of symptom onset between November 24th, 2021 and February 1st, 2022, during which time Omicron replaced Delta as the dominant variant in the sample population. Swabs were tested by the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test and compared using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reference testing. Reference samples identified as positive were sequenced to identify the SARS-CoV-2 variant. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was calculated, with results stratified by RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct). ResultsOf the 38 participants for whom LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test results were available, 36 were confirmed positive by RT-PCR. Overall, PPA of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test was 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 82.3%, 99.4%) and PPA was 100% for samples with a Ct <33. Sufficient viral load for sequencing was present in nine samples (six Delta, three Omicron), all of which returned a positive result using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test. There were no performance differences observed between participants with the Delta and Omicron variants. ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 differences between Delta and Omicron variant mutations did not affect the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test which detects the nucleocapsid protein antigen. The LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test can be a useful antigen test to diagnose emerging variants of coronavirus disease 2019.

Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Testing across SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Variants of SARS-CoV-2 have mutations in the viral genome that may alter the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests. We conducted analytical and clinical accuracy studies of two FDA-approved rapid antigen tests--SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Test (InBios International, Seattle) and BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag CARD; (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago)--using three using replication-competent variants or strains, including Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and a wild-type of SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020). Overall, we found non-significant differences in the analytical limit of detection or clinical diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen testing across SARS-CoV-2 variants. This study provides analytical and clinical performance data to demonstrate the preserved accuracy of rapid antigen testing across SARS-CoV-2 variants among symptomatic adults.

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of individuals with confirmed infection: performance and operational considerations

BackgroundPoint-of-care and decentralized testing for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform public health responses. Performance evaluations in priority use cases such as contact tracing can highlight trade-offs in test selection and testing strategies. MethodsA prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted among close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Brazil. Two anterior nares swabs (ANS), a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and saliva were collected at all visits. Vaccination history and symptoms were assessed. Household contacts were followed longitudinally. Three rapid antigen tests and one molecular method were evaluated for usability and performance against reference RT-PCR on NPS. ResultsFifty index cases and 214 contacts (64 household) were enrolled. Sixty-five contacts were RT-PCR positive during at least one visit. Vaccination did not influence viral load. Gamma variants were most prevalent; Delta emerged increasingly during implementation. Overall sensitivity of evaluated tests ranged from 33%-76%. Performance was higher among symptomatic cases and cases with Ct<34 and lower among oligo/asymptomatic cases. Assuming a 24-hour time-to-result for RT-PCR, the cumulative sensitivity of an ANS rapid antigen test was >70% and almost 90% after four days. ConclusionsThe near immediate time-to-result for antigen tests significantly offsets lower analytical sensitivity in settings where RT-PCR results are delayed or unavailable.

A rapid, high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunoassay to aid diagnosis of acute COVID-19 at the point of care

BackgroundThe LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 antigen test, which uses a high-sensitivity, microfluidic immunoassay to detect the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2, was evaluated for diagnosing acute COVID-19 in adults and children across point-of-care settings. MethodsTwo paired anterior nasal swabs or two paired nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from each participant. Swabs were tested by the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 antigen test and compared with real-time PCR (rt-PCR; Roche cobas 6800 platform). Positive- and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results stratified based on gender, age, duration of symptoms, and rt-PCR cycle threshold. ResultsOut of the 512 participants, aged 0-90 years, of this prospective validation study, 414 (81%) were symptomatic for COVID-19 and 123 (24%) swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2 based on rt-PCR testing. Compared with rt-PCR, the 12-minute swab test had 97.6% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity within 12 days of symptom onset, representing the period of infectivity. All (100%) samples detected within 33 rt-PCR cycles were also identified using the antigen test. Results were consistent across age and gender. Despite being performed by minimally trained healthcare workers, the user error rate of the test system was 1%. ConclusionThe rapid high-sensitivity assay using nasopharyngeal or anterior nasal sampling may offer significant improvements for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in clinic- and community-based settings. SummaryA 12-minute nasal swab test detects 97.6% of COVID-19 infections, compared to gold standard real-time PCR testing, up to 12 days following symptom onset using a microfluidic immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein.