ABSTRACT
The intravenous therapy team at Massachusetts General Hospital studied the potential infectious risks of maintaining percutaneous inserted central catheters (PICC) for prolonged periods. Cultures of 100 PICC sites and catheters were performed on removal of the catheters, which had remained in place for 2 to 43 days. The insertion sites and/or proximal or distal segments of the catheters were found to be colonized in 11% of the patients, with distal catheter tips significantly colonized in only four patients. Nine of the patients were colonized at the insertion site. Bacteremia did not occur as a result of the extended dwell time of the catheters.
Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Bacteriological Techniques , HumansABSTRACT
The I.V. nurse's monitoring specific drug therapy includes familiarity with a drug's action, with its performance in different clinical situations, with proper dosage and observations for adverse effects. This article presents three drugs in different classifications, indications for use and additional useful information.
Subject(s)
Acyclovir/analogs & derivatives , Aztreonam/therapeutic use , Propanolamines/therapeutic use , Acyclovir/therapeutic use , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Ganciclovir , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
The feasibility of implementing a multiple-dose, multiple-flow-rate syringe pump system in a large teaching institution and a community hospital is described. The new syringe pump system was evaluated on medical and surgical wards in each hospital for a period of time sufficient to evaluate 40 courses of therapy in each hospital. At the time the new syringe pump system was implemented, the teaching hospital was using a gravity-dependent bottle and burette system and the community hospital was using a single-dose syringe pump system. At the end of the study period, the material costs of the existing i.v. infusion systems were compared with the material costs of the new syringe pump system, and the nurses involved in the study were questioned about their attitudes toward the new system. Use of the multiple-dose syringe pump system resulted in a savings of $934.81 in material costs compared with the bottle and burette system and $9.70 in material costs compared with the single-dose syringe pump system (based on 40 doses). When the cost of wasted drug was considered, the cost per day of the multiple-dose syringe pump system was substantially less (70%) than the cost per day of the bottle and burette system and approximately the same as the cost per day for the single-dose syringe pump system. The majority of nurses indicated that the new system was easier or no more difficult to use than the existing i.v. infusion system and were in favor of switching to the new system. Implementation of a multiple-dose, multiple-flow-rate syringe pump system may result in cost savings over a traditional bottle and burette system and could complement an existing single-dose syringe infusion system.
