Nuts and bolts of 4D-MRI for radiotherapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in the radiotherapy workflow because of its superior soft tissue contrast and high flexibility in contrast. In addition to anatomical and functional imaging, MRI can also be used to characterize the physiologically induced motion of both the tumor and organs-at-risk. Respiratory-correlated 4D-MRI has gained large interest as an alternative to 4D-CT for the characterization of respiratory motion throughout the thorax and abdomen. These 4D-MRI data sets consist of three spatial dimensions and the respiratory phase or amplitude over the fourth dimension (opposed to time-resolved 4D-MRI that represents time in the fourth dimension). Over the last 15 years numerous methods have been presented in literature. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the various 4D-MRI techniques, and describes the differences in MRI data acquisition and 4D data set generation from a methodological point of view. The current status and future perspective of these techniques are highlighted, and the requirements for safe introduction into the clinic (e.g. method validation) are discussed.

Recommendations for MRI-based contouring of gross tumor volume and organs at risk for radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence is a common and morbid event in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A more conformal and targeted radiation dose to the macroscopic tumor in nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer is likely to reduce acute toxicity and improve local control. Optimal soft tissue contrast is required to facilitate delineation of a target and creation of a planning target volume with margin reduction and motion management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers considerable advantages in optimizing soft tissue delineation and is an ideal modality for imaging and delineating a gross tumor volume (GTV) within the pancreas, particularly as it relates to conformal radiation planning. Currently, no guidelines have been defined for the delineation of pancreatic tumors for radiation therapy treatment planning. Moreover, abdominal MRI sequences are complex and the anatomy relevant to the radiation oncologist can be challenging. The purpose of this study is to provide recommendations for delineation of GTV and organs at risk (OARs) using MRI and incorporating multiple MRI sequences. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with pancreatic cancer and 1 healthy subject were imaged with MRI scans either on 1.5T or on 3T magnets in 2 separate institutes. The GTV and OARs were contoured for all patients in a consensus meeting. RESULTS: An overview of MRI-based anatomy of the GTV and OARs is provided. Practical contouring instructions for the GTV and the OARs with the aid of MRI were developed and included in these recommendations. In addition, practical suggestions for implementation of MRI in pancreatic radiation treatment planning are provided. CONCLUSIONS: With this report, we attempt to provide recommendations for MRI-based contouring of pancreatic tumors and OARs. This could lead to better uniformity in defining the GTV and OARs for clinical trials and in radiation therapy treatment planning, with the ultimate goal of improving local control while minimizing morbidity.

Repeatability of Standardized and Normalized Relative CBV in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For more widespread clinical use advanced imaging methods such as relative cerebral blood volume must be both accurate and repeatable. The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of relative CBV measurements in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme by using several of the most commonly published estimation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relative CBV estimates were calculated from dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging in double-baseline examinations for 33 patients with treatment-naïve and pathologically proved glioblastoma multiforme (men = 20; mean age = 55 years). Normalized and standardized relative CBV were calculated by using 6 common postprocessing methods. The repeatability of both normalized and standardized relative CBV, in both tumor and contralateral brain, was examined for each method with metrics of repeatability, including the repeatability coefficient and within-subject coefficient of variation. The minimum sample size required to detect a parameter change of 10% or 20% was also determined for both normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV for each estimation method. RESULTS: When ordered by the repeatability coefficient, methods using postprocessing leakage correction and ΔR2*(t) techniques offered superior repeatability. Across processing techniques, the standardized relative CBV repeatability in normal-appearing brain was comparable with that in tumor (P = .31), yet inferior in tumor for normalized relative CBV (P = .03). On the basis of the within-subject coefficient of variation, tumor standardized relative CBV estimates were less variable (13%-20%) than normalized relative CBV estimates (24%-67%). The minimum number of participants needed to detect a change of 10% or 20% is 118-643 or 30-161 for normalized relative CBV and 109-215 or 28-54 for standardized relative CBV. CONCLUSIONS: The ΔR2* estimation methods that incorporate leakage correction offer the best repeatability for relative CBV, with standardized relative CBV being less variable and requiring fewer participants to detect a change compared with normalized relative CBV.

The effect of pulse sequence parameters and contrast agent dose on percentage signal recovery in DSC-MRI: implications for clinical applications.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both technical and pathophysiologic factors affect PSR in DSC-MR imaging. We aimed to determine how TE, flip angle (α), and contrast dose impact PSR in high-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively computed PSR maps for 22 patients with high-grade gliomas, comparing 3 DSC-MR imaging methods by using single-dose gadodiamide without preload administration: A (n = 7), α = 35°, TE = 54 ms; B (n = 5), α = 72°, TE = 30 ms; C (n = 10), α = 90°, TE = 30 ms. Methods A-C served as preload for subsequent dynamic imaging using method D (method C parameters but with double-dose contrast). We compared first- and second-injection tumor PSR for methods C and D (paired t test) and tumor PSR for both injections grouped by the first-injection acquisition method (3-group nonparametric 1-way ANOVA). We compared PSR in tumor and normal brain for each first- and second-injection method group (paired t test). RESULTS: First-injection PSR in tumor and normal brain differed significantly for methods B (P = .01) and C (P = .05), but not A (P = .71). First-injection tumor PSR increased with T1 weighting with a significant main effect of method groupings (P = .0012), but there was no significant main effect for first-injection normal brain (P = .93), or second-injection tumor (P = .95) or normal brain (P = .13). In patients scanned with methods C and D, first-injection PSR significantly exceeded second-injection PSR for tumor (P = .037) and normal brain (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: PSR strongly depends on the T1 weighting of DSC-MR imaging, including pulse sequence (TE, α) and contrast agent (dose, preload) parameters, with implications for protocol design and the interpretation and comparison of PSR values across tumor types and imaging centers.

The Role of preload and leakage correction in gadolinium-based cerebral blood volume estimation determined by comparison with MION as a criterion standard.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast extravasation in DSC-MRI potentiates inaccurate and imprecise estimates of glioma rCBV. We tested assertions that preload and postprocessing algorithms minimize this error by comparing Gd-rCBV using permutations of these 2 techniques with criterion standard rCBV using MION, an intravascular agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We imaged 7 Fisher rats with 9L gliosarcomas, by using 3T gradient-echo DSC-MRI with MION (2.0 mg Fe/kg) and staged injection of Gd-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid: a 0.1-mmol/kg bolus provided no preload (P-) data and served as preload (P+) for a subsequent 0.2-mmol/kg bolus. We computed MION-rCBV (steady-state ΔR2*, tumor versus normal brain) and Gd-rCBV ΔR2* [t] integration) without (C-) and with (C+) postprocessing correction, thereby testing 4 correction permutations: P-C-, P-C+, P+C-, and P+C+. We tested whether each permutation reduced bias and variance of the Gd/MION rCBV differences by using generalized estimating equations and Fmax statistics (P < .05 significant). RESULTS: Gd-rCBV progressively better approximated MION-rCBV with increasing leakage correction. There was no statistically significant bias for the mean percentage deviation of Gd-rCBV from MION-rCBV for any correction permutation, but there was significantly reduced variance by using P+C- (22-fold), P-C+ (32-fold), and P+C+ (267-fold) compared with P-C-. P+C+ provided significant additional variance reduction compared with P+C- (12-fold) and P-C+ (8-fold). Linear regression of Gd-rCBV versus MION-rCBV revealed P+C+ to have the closest slope and intercept compared with the ideal, substantially better than P+C-. CONCLUSIONS: Preload and postprocessing correction significantly reduced the variance of Gd-rCBV estimates, and bias reduction approached significance. Postprocessing correction provide significant benefit beyond preload alone.