Group independent components underpin responses to items from a depression scale.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to investigate the brain circuits or networks that underpin diagnostically specific tasks by means of group independent component analysis for FMRI toolbox (GIFT). We hypothesised that there will be neural network patterns of activation and deactivation, which correspond to real-time performance on clinical self-evaluation scales. METHODS: In total, 20 healthy controls (HC) and 22 patients with major depressive episode have been included. All subjects were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with paradigm composed of diagnostic clinical self-assessment depression scale contrasted to neutral scale. The data were processed with group independent component analysis for functional MRI toolbox and statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: The results have demonstrated that there exist positively or negatively modulated brain networks during processing of diagnostic specific task questions for depressive disorder. There have also been confirmed differences in the networks processing diagnostic versus off blocks between patients and controls in anterior cingulate cortex and middle frontal gyrus. Diagnostic conditions (depression scale) when contrasted to neutral conditions demonstrate differential activity of right superior frontal gyrus and right middle cingulate cortex in the comparison of patients with HC. CONCLUSION: Potential neuroimaging of state-dependent biomarkers has been directly linked with clinical assessment self-evaluation scale, administered as stimuli simultaneously with the fMRI acquisition. It may be regarded as further evidence in support of the convergent capacity of both methods to distinguish groups by means of incremental translational cross-validation.

Topology switching during window thresholding fMRI-based functional networks of patients with major depressive disorder: Consensus network approach.

We present a novel method for analyzing brain functional networks using functional magnetic resonance imaging data, which involves utilizing consensus networks. In this study, we compare our approach to a standard group-based method for patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a healthy control group, taking into account different levels of connectivity. Our findings demonstrate that the consensus network approach uncovers distinct characteristics in network measures and degree distributions when considering connection strengths. In the healthy control group, as connection strengths increase, we observe a transition in the network topology from a combination of scale-free and random topologies to a small-world topology. Conversely, the MDD group exhibits uncertainty in weak connections, while strong connections display small-world properties. In contrast, the group-based approach does not exhibit significant differences in behavior between the two groups. However, it does indicate a transition in topology from a scale-free-like structure to a combination of small-world and scale-free topologies. The use of the consensus network approach also holds immense potential for the classification of MDD patients, as it unveils substantial distinctions between the two groups.

Toward interpretability of machine learning methods for the classification of patients with major depressive disorder based on functional network measures.

We address the interpretability of the machine learning algorithm in the context of the relevant problem of discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls using functional networks derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We applied linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to the data from 35 MDD patients and 50 healthy controls to discriminate between the two groups utilizing functional networks' global measures as the features. We proposed the combined approach for feature selection based on statistical methods and the wrapper-type algorithm. This approach revealed that the groups are indistinguishable in the univariate feature space but become distinguishable in a three-dimensional feature space formed by the identified most important features: mean node strength, clustering coefficient, and the number of edges. LDA achieves the highest accuracy when considering the network with all connections or only the strongest ones. Our approach allowed us to analyze the separability of classes in the multidimensional feature space, which is critical for interpreting the results of machine learning models. We demonstrated that the parametric planes of the control and MDD groups rotate in the feature space with increasing the thresholding parameter and that their intersection increases with approaching the threshold of 0.45, for which classification accuracy is minimal. Overall, the combined approach for feature selection provides an effective and interpretable scenario for discriminating between MDD patients and healthy controls using measures of functional connectivity networks. This approach can be applied to other machine learning tasks to achieve high accuracy while ensuring the interpretability of the results.

Effective Connectivity Between the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Precuneus Differentiates Major Psychiatric Disorders: Results from a Transdiagnostic Spectral DCM Study.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: We have previously identified aberrant connectivity of the left precuneus, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior insula in patients with either a paranoid (schizophrenia), or a depressive syndrome (both unipolar and bipolar). In the current study, we attempted to replicate and expand these findings by including a healthy control sample and separating the patients in a depressive episode into two groups: unipolar and bipolar depression. We hypothesized that the connections between those major nodes of the resting state networks would demonstrate different patterns in the three patient groups compared to the healthy subjects. METHODS: Resting-state functional MRI was performed on a sample of 101 participants, of which 26 patients with schizophrenia (current psychotic episodes), 24 subjects with Bipolar Disorder (BD), 33 with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (both BD and MDD patients were in a current depressive episode), and 21 healthy controls. Spectral Dynamic Causal Modeling was used to calculate the coupling values between eight regions of interest, including the anterior precuneus (PRC), anterior hippocampus, anterior insula, angular gyrus, lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC), middle frontal gyrus, planum temporale, and anterior thalamus. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: We identified disturbed effective connectivity from the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex to the left anterior precuneus that differed significantly between unipolar depression, where the influence was inhibitory, and bipolar depression, where the effect was excitatory. A logistic regression analysis correctly classified 75% of patients with unipolar and bipolar depression based solely on the coupling values of this connection. In addition, patients with schizophrenia demonstrated negative effective connectivity from the anterior PRC to the lateral OFC, which distinguished them from healthy controls and patients with major depression. Future studies with unmedicated patients will be needed to establish the replicability of our findings.

Cross-Validation of Paranoid-Depressive Scale and Functional MRI: New Paradigm for Neuroscience Informed Clinical Psychopathology.

There is reported a study performed with a novel paradigm aiming at investigation of the translational validity of von Zerssen's paranoid-depression scale and its fMRI correlates in terms of focus on exploration of the results on the contrast between the Paranoid Specific (DP) blocks and the Depression Specific (DS) blocks. Patients with schizophrenia demonstrated significant activations in a number of regions (right angular gyrus, left posterior cingulate and precuneus, right transverse temporal gyrus) during responses to paranoia versus depression items which differ topologically from those found in patients with major depression (left middle cingulate and right superior temporal gyrus). The direct comparison between the groups, however, did not yield any residual activations after correction.