Radical Resection in Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recurrence-Free Survival Rate and Definition of a Risk Score for Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Surgery with radical intent is the only potentially curative option for entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs) but many patients develop recurrence even after many years. The subset of patients at high risk of disease recurrence has not been clearly defined to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to define, in a series of completely resected EP-NETs, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and a risk score for disease recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of sporadic pancreatic NETs (PanNETs) or small intestine NETs (SiNETs) [G1/G2] that underwent R0/R1 surgery (years 2000-2016) with at least a 24-month follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factor analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 441 patients (224 PanNETs and 217 SiNETs) were included, with a median Ki67 of 2% in tumor tissue and 8.2% stage IV disease. Median RFS was 101 months (5-year rate 67.9%). The derived prognostic score defined by multivariable analysis included prognostic parameters, such as TNM stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The score distinguished three risk categories with a significantly different RFS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of patients with EP-NETs recurred within 5 years after radical surgery. Risk factors for recurrence were disease stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The definition of risk categories may help in selecting patients who might benefit from adjuvant treatments and more intensive follow-up programs.

Efficacy of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome: final overall survival from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 RADIANT-2 study.

Background: In the phase 3 RADIANT-2 study, everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) showed improvement of 5.1 months in median progression-free survival versus placebo plus octreotide LAR among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors associated with carcinoid syndrome. The progression-free survival P-value was marginally above the prespecified threshold for statistical significance. Here, we report final overall survival (OS) and key safety update from RADIANT-2. Patients and methods: The RADIANT-2 trial compared everolimus (10 mg/day, orally; n = 216) versus placebo (n = 213), both in conjunction with octreotide LAR (30 mg, intramuscularly, every 28 days). Patients, unblinded at the time of progression or after end of double-blind core phase following primary analysis, were offered open-label everolimus with octreotide LAR (open-label phase). In the open-label phase, patients had similar safety and efficacy assessments as those in the core phase. For OS, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using unadjusted Cox model and a Cox model adjusted for prespecified baseline covariates were calculated. Results: A total of 170 patients received open-label everolimus (143 crossed over from the placebo arm; 27 in the everolimus arm continued to receive the same treatment after unblinding). The median OS (95% CI) after 271 events was 29.2 months (23.8-35.9) for the everolimus arm and 35.2 months (30.0-44.7) for the placebo arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.49). HR adjusted for baseline covariates was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84-1.38). The most frequent drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs reported during the open-label phase were diarrhea (5.3%), fatigue (4.7%), and stomatitis (4.1%). Deaths related to pulmonary or cardiac failure were observed more frequently in the everolimus arm. Conclusion: No significant difference in OS was observed for the everolimus plus octreotide LAR and placebo plus octreotide LAR arms of the RADIANT-2 study, even after adjusting for imbalances in the baseline covariates. Clinical Trial Number: NCT00412061, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Effect of everolimus on the pharmacokinetics of octreotide long-acting repeatable in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the randomized phase III RADIANT-2 trial.

In the RADIANT-2 trial, addition of everolimus to octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) exhibited a clinically meaningful 5.1-month improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced functional neuroendocrine tumors. In this study, we characterized the effects of everolimus co-administration on octreotide LAR pharmacokinetics and its relationship with efficacy and safety. At least one evaluable blood everolimus and plasma octreotide predose minimum concentration (Cmin ) was available for 182 patients and 294 patients, respectively. Concomitant everolimus administration increased octreotide Cmin with a geometric mean ratio (everolimus/placebo) of 1.47 (90% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-1.64). Risk for progression was consistently reduced when everolimus Cmin was increased twofold, regardless of octreotide exposure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.46-1.18; HR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.32-0.92 for 6 ng/mL and 4 ng/mL octreotide, respectively). Risk for pulmonary or metabolic events was associated with increased everolimus Cmin . Co-administration of everolimus plus octreotide LAR increased octreotide Cmin , which did not impact efficacy.

The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) is a molecularly targeted radiation therapy involving the systemic administration of a radiolabelled peptide designed to target with high affinity and specificity receptors overexpressed on tumours. PRRNT employing the radiotagged somatostatin receptor agonists (90)Y-DOTATOC ([(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotide) or (177)Lu-DOTATATE ([(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3),Thr(8)]-octreotide or [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate) have been successfully used for the past 15 years to target metastatic or inoperable neuroendocrine tumours expressing the somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Accumulated evidence from clinical experience indicates that these tumours can be subjected to a high absorbed dose which leads to partial or complete objective responses in up to 30 % of treated patients. Survival analyses indicate that patients presenting with high tumour receptor expression at study entry and receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE or (90)Y-DOTATOC treatment show significantly higher objective responses, leading to longer survival and improved quality of life. Side effects of PRRNT are typically seen in the kidneys and bone marrow. These, however, are usually mild provided adequate protective measures are undertaken. Despite the large body of evidence regarding efficacy and clinical safety, PRRNT is still considered an investigational treatment and its implementation must comply with national legislation, and ethical guidelines concerning human therapeutic investigations. This guidance was formulated based on recent literature and leading experts' opinions. It covers the rationale, indications and contraindications for PRRNT, assessment of treatment response and patient follow-up. This document is aimed at guiding nuclear medicine specialists in selecting likely candidates to receive PRRNT and to deliver the treatment in a safe and effective manner. This document is largely based on the book published through a joint international effort under the auspices of the Nuclear Medicine Section of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are frequently diagnosed late and not amenable to curative surgery due to metastatic disease to the liver and lymph nodes. The disease is complex and heterogeneous given the various functionalities, distinct tumor growth patterns, and tumor spread upon diagnosis. Established therapies include somatostatin analogues, alpha-interferon, systemic chemotherapy, and loco-regional therapies of the liver. The availability of novel agents and expression of targets, such as growth factor receptors, different subtypes of somatostatin receptors, and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have led to the exploration of different classes of drugs and offer new treatment opportunities in neuroendocrine tumors. This review provides an overview on novel drugs, focus on the impact of recently approved drugs on the management of NET disease, and outline future perspectives.

Adrenomedullin is a novel marker of tumor progression in neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Adrenomedullin is a multi-functional polypeptide hormone. Its involvement in angiogenesis and vasodilator action support the hypothesis that adrenomedullin may be a secretory product of neuroendocrine tumors and contribute to tumor progression. Plasma levels of adrenomedullin were measured by radioimmunoassay in 46 patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial system. Tissue expression of adrenomedullin was studied using monoclonal antibodies on pretreated paraffin embedded tissues in a group of 31 patients. Adrenomedullin plasma levels were significantly elevated in patients compared to healthy age-matched controls (p < 0.001). The highest plasma levels were found in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of bronchial, midgut and unknown origin. Patients with progressive disease had higher plasma levels than patients with stable disease (p < 0.001). Of the examined tumor samples, 55 % showed cytoplasmic staining for adrenomedullin > 5 % of the total tumor area. Plasma levels and tissue expression of adrenomedullin did not correlate with functional activity of the tumors or presence of the carcinoid syndrome, but did with tumor progression (p < 0.001 and p < 0.014). In conclusion, plasma and tissue expression of the angiogenic peptide adrenomedullin are predictive of tumor progression in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Adrenomedullin might represent a useful prognostic marker in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Impact of growth hormone on central nervous activity, vigilance, and tiredness after short-term therapy in growth hormone-deficient adults.

Impairment of well-being and cognitive function has been reported in growth hormone-deficient adults, as well as an improvement of these parameters after GH substitution, albeit inconsistently. The effect of growth hormone on central nervous activity, vigilance and sleepiness was studied prospectively in 16 growth hormone-deficient adults (7 females, 9 males, mean age: 36.8 yrs) with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies before and 3 months after the start of growth hormone substitution using two objective methods of measurement, pupillographic sleepiness test and a choice reaction time test. Significant differences were found for neither pupillary unrest index nor for reaction time, false or missing reactions in 12 evaluable patients (7 females, 5 males, mean age 37.8 years). Because of the known interrelationships between growth hormone, sleep and mood, the visual analogue scale for tiredness and standardized retrospective questionnaires regarding sleep and mood (Pittsburgh sleep quality index, Epworth sleepiness scale, Depression scale) were used as additional methods. After GH substitution, there was no difference in sleep efficiency and daytime sleepiness, but some of the subjective sleep parameters (sleep quality and sleep latency) improved significantly. There was a tendency for mood improvement, too. Although results must be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size, we conclude that the improved sleep and mood parameters might be caused by other indices of general well-being in our study.