Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(7)2021 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34202064

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to characterize dental anomalies. The pretreatment records (photographs and radiographs) of 2897 patients (41.4% males and 58.6% females) were utilized to detect dental anomalies. The dental anomalies studied were related to number, size and shape, position, and eruption. A Chi-square test was carried out to detect associations between dental anomalies, jaw, and sex. A total of 1041 (36%) of the subjects manifested at least one dental anomaly. The prevalence of all dental anomalies was jaw-dependent and greater in the maxilla, except for submerged and transmigrated teeth. The most frequently missing teeth were the maxillary lateral incisor (62.3%) and the mandibular second premolars (60.6%). The most frequent supernumerary teeth were the incisors in the maxilla (97%) and the first premolars in the mandible (43%). Dental anomalies are more frequent in the maxilla and mainly involve the anterior teeth; in the mandible, however, it is the posterior teeth. These differences can be attributed to the evolutionary history of the jaws and their diverse development patterns.

2.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 44(4): 268-273, 2020 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33167020

ABSTRACT

Tooth transposition is a relatively rare dental anomaly of interchange in position of two adjacent teeth. AIM: To determine the prevalence and distribution of canine transposition in a sample of orthodontic patients and present treatment alternatives and outcome. STUDY DESIGN: The records of 3000 consecutively treated orthodontic patients from a university clinic were surveyed to detect canine transposition in both dental arches. The data was recorded according to gender, age, number and location. RESULTS: Canine transpositions were detected in 15 subjects, 3 (20%) males and 12 (80%) females presenting a prevalence of 0.5%. Of them, 6 were between the maxillary canine and first premolar, 7 between the maxillary canine and lateral incisor, 2 transpositions were between the mandibular canine and the lateral incisor. A female to male ratio of 4:1 with left side predominance was found. Treatment options include extracting the transposed teeth, maintaining them in their transposed position, or repositioning them in their normal place within the dental arch. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of canine transposition in the present sample was found to be 0.5% with a greater frequency in the maxilla. Treatment options include extraction of one of the transposed teeth, alignment of the teeth in their transposed position or correction of the anomaly. The latter gives the best esthetic outcome.


Subject(s)
Tooth Eruption, Ectopic , Cuspid , Esthetics, Dental , Female , Humans , Incisor , Male , Maxilla , Prevalence , Tooth Eruption, Ectopic/epidemiology , Tooth Eruption, Ectopic/therapy
3.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 43(4): 244-251, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094630

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Supernumerary teeth are one of the most common anomalies in the human dentition, found most frequently in the maxillary anterior region causing impaction or displacement of the adjacent permanent teeth. AIM: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in orthodontically treated patients. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-treatment facial and intraoral photographs, study models, panoramic and periapical radiographs of 3,000 consecutively treated orthodontic patients (mean age 12.2 years) from the Department of Orthodontics Tel Aviv University, were examined to detect supernumerary teeth in both arches. They were recorded according to gender, age, number, location, position and morphology. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 22 (61%) males and 14 (39%) females with 50 supernumerary teeth, of which 42 (84%) were found in the maxillary anterior region, and 8 (16%) in the mandible, presenting a prevalence of 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: A prevalence of 1.2% was found in our study. The most common supernumerary tooth is mesiodens located at the maxillary anterior region. The characteristics of supernumeraries were based on their morphology, location and position. The most frequent complications caused were rotations, displacement and arrested eruption of maxillary incisors.


Subject(s)
Tooth, Impacted , Tooth, Supernumerary , Child , Female , Humans , Incisor , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Tooth, Supernumerary/epidemiology
4.
J Dent Child (Chic) ; 85(3): 133-138, 2018 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30869590

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Tooth agenesis is one of the most common anomalies of the human dentition, found most often in the maxillary anterior region and in the mandibular and maxillary premolar regions. Little information is available on the prevalence and distribution of permanent canine agenesis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of permanent canine agenesis in orthodontic patients and describe treatment options and outcomes. Methods: The records of 3,000 consecutively treated patients in the Department of Orthodontics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel were reviewed. The pre-treatment facial and intraoral clinical photographs as well as panoramic and periapical radiographs were used to detect permanent canine agenesis in both dental arches. The data were recorded according to sex, age, number of missing canines, and their location. Results: Twenty-three patients (0.76 percent), nine males (39 percent) and 14 females (61 percent) had 38 congenitally missing canines. Of these, 22 (58 percent) were missing in the maxilla and 16 (42 percent) were missing in the mandible. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of missing permanent canines in our population was 0.76 percent. The female-to-male prevalence ratio was approximately three to two and more canines were missing in the maxilla than in the mandible.


Subject(s)
Anodontia/epidemiology , Anodontia/pathology , Anodontia/therapy , Cuspid/abnormalities , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cuspid/diagnostic imaging , Dental Arch/diagnostic imaging , Dental Arch/pathology , Female , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Malocclusion/pathology , Malocclusion/therapy , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/pathology , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/pathology , Orthodontics , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Prevalence , Radiography, Panoramic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...