Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 35(3): 185-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many critically ill patients are incapable of receiving information or expressing their own opinion on treatment decisions due to the severity of their disease, or because they are under sedation. French legislation requires that when a physician proposes further tests or treatment for a patient, this proposal should be accompanied by clear and honest information that is appropriate in view of the circumstances and the patient's state of health, and the physician must obtain the patient's consent before proceeding. However, this is often impossible in critical care. We evaluated whether provisions for surrogates are adequate in meeting information needs of patients and families in critical care. METHODS: Survey of intensive care physicians by electronic questionnaire in December 2010 and January 2011 to evaluate actual practices. The questionnaire comprised 6 domains covering various aspects relating to the information of patients' relatives as regards diagnostic testing in critical care, when the patient was unable to be appropriately informed. We recorded responders' socio-demographic data (age, how long in practice, where they practised). RESULTS: Among 1279 physicians contacted, 139 (10.8%) from 98 critical care departments (France, Belgium, Switzerland) responded. A total of 66.2% said they believed it is possible to perform diagnostic tests without informing the patient's relatives. Invasive or high-risk tests, time available to provide information, and quality of prior relations with the patient's family were factors likely to prompt the physician to inform the family, while potentially serious implications for the relatives, and degree of relation of the family member to the patient were reported to make the physician more reluctant to inform relatives. Less than 6% considered routine procedures to require provision of information to relatives. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that modalities for providing information to families and relatives, as defined by current French legislation, are not suitable to the context of critical care.


Subject(s)
Communication , Critical Care/organization & administration , Family , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Professional-Family Relations , Adult , Age Factors , Belgium , Diagnosis , Female , France , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland
2.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0127168, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25965915

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We investigated incidence, risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation (NAF), and prognostic impact during septic shock in medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: Prospective, observational study in a university hospital. Consecutive patients from 03/2011 to 05/2013 with septic shock were eligible. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, history of AF, transfer with prior septic shock. Included patients were equipped with long-duration (7 days) Holter ECG monitoring. NAF was defined as an AF episode lasting >30 seconds. Patient characteristics, infection criteria, cardiovascular parameters, severity of illness, support therapies were recorded. RESULTS: Among 66 patients, 29(44%) developed NAF; 10 (34%) would not have been diagnosed without Holter ECG monitoring. NAF patients were older, with more markers of heart failure (troponin and NT-pro-BNP), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), longer QRS duration and more nonsustained supra ventricular arrhythmias (<30s) on day 1 than patients who maintained sinus rhythm. By multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.06; p = 0.01) and LVEF<45% (OR: 13.01, p = 0.03) were associated with NAF. NAF did not predict 28 or 90 day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: NAF is common, especially in older patients, and is associated with low ejection fraction. We did not find NAF to be independently associated with higher mortality.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Shock, Septic/complications , Shock, Septic/mortality
3.
Crit Care Med ; 41(11): 2600-9, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23963127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate mortality of ICU patients over a 3-month period after an initial episode of septic shock and to identify factors associated with mortality. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. SETTING: Fourteen ICUs from 10 French nonacademic and university teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: All consecutive adult patients with septic shock admitted between October 2009 and September 2011 were eligible. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazard model and a flexible extension of the Cox model. In total, 1,495 of 10,941 patients (13.7%) had septic shock and 1,488 patients (99.5%) were included. Median age was 68 years (range, 58-78 yr). The majority of admissions (84%) were medical. Median (interquartile range) Simplified Acute Physiological Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment were, respectively, 56 (45-70) and 11 (9-14). ICU and hospital mortality were, respectively, 39.4% and 48.6%. At 3 months, 776 patients (52.2%) had died. Factors significantly associated with increased risk of death in the multivariable Cox model were older age, male sex, comorbidities (immune deficiency, cirrhosis), Knaus C/D score, and high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Flexible analyses indicated that the impact of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was greatest early after septic shock, while the onset of the effect of age, nosocomial infection, and cirrhosis was later. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most recent large-scale epidemiological study to investigate medium-term mortality in nonselected patients hospitalized in the ICU for septic shock. Advances in early management have improved survival at the initial phase, but risk of death persists in the medium term. Flexible modeling techniques yield insights into the profile of the risk of death in the first 3 months.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , APACHE , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Shock, Septic/mortality
4.
J Crit Care ; 28(5): 634-9, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683565

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Feasibility study examining whether plethysmographic variability index (PVI) can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the early phase of septic shock in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric, prospective, observational study that included 31 mechanically ventilated and sedated patients with septic shock in whom volume expansion was planned. The patients were equipped with a pulse oximeter that automatically calculated and displayed PVI. The intervention consisted in infusing 8 mL/kg of hydroxylethyl starch over a 20-minute period. Before and after intervention, we recorded PVI and measured the aortic velocity-time integral (VTIao) using transthoracic echocardiography. Responders were defined as patients who increased their VTIao by 15% or higher after fluid infusion. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were classified as responders, and 15 as nonresponders. Mean PVI values before intervention were significantly higher in responders vs nonresponders (30%±9% vs 8%±5%, P<.001). Plethysmographic variability index values before intervention were correlated with percent changes in VTIao induced by intervention (R2=0.67; P<.001). A PVI threshold value of 19% discriminates responders from nonresponders with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 87% (area under the curve, 0.97; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PVI is a feasible and interesting method to predict fluid responsiveness in early phase septic shock patients in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Fluid Therapy , Plethysmography , Respiration, Artificial , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Shock, Septic/therapy , Aged , Blood Flow Velocity , Echocardiography , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/therapeutic use , Male , Oximetry , Pilot Projects , Plasma Substitutes/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Crit Care ; 17(2): R65, 2013 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23561510

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To provide up-to-date information on the prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study in ICUs from 14 French general (non-academic) and university teaching hospitals. All consecutive patients with septic shock admitted between November 2009 and March 2011 were eligible for inclusion. We prospectively recorded data regarding patient characteristics, infection, severity of illness, life support therapy, and discharge. RESULTS: Among 10,941 patients admitted to participating ICUs between October 2009 and September 2011, 1,495 (13.7%) patients presented inclusion criteria for septic shock and were included. Invasive mechanical ventilation was needed in 83.9% (n=1248), inotropes in 27.7% (n=412), continuous renal replacement therapy in 32.5% (n=484), and hemodialysis in 19.6% (n=291). Mortality at 28 days was 42% (n=625). Variables associated with time to mortality, right-censored at day 28: age (for each additional 10 years) (hazard ratio (HR)=1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.38), immunosuppression (HR=1.63; 95%CI: 1.37-1.96), Knaus class C/D score versus class A/B score (HR=1.36; 95%CI:1.14-1.62) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (HR=1.24 for each additional point; 95%CI: 1.21-1.27). Patients with septic shock and renal/urinary tract infection had a significantly longer time to mortality (HR=0.56; 95%CI: 0.42-0.75). CONCLUSION: Our observational data of consecutive patients from real-life practice confirm that septic shock is common and carries high mortality in general ICU populations. Our results are in contrast with the clinical trial setting, and could be useful for healthcare planning and clinical study design.


Subject(s)
Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Prospective Studies , Shock, Septic/mortality
6.
Intensive Care Med ; 38(8): 1272-9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Candida spp. airway colonization could promote development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a potentially multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, and worsen the outcome of VAP regardless of pathogen. We therefore address the question of the risk of MDR bacteria isolation within the airway of patients with suspected VAP, whether Candida spp. is present or not. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected VAP were included. Respiratory tract secretions were seeded on specific medium for yeast isolation in addition to standard culture. Outcome as well as presence of MDR bacteria were assessed according to fungal colonization. RESULTS: 323 suspected VAP were analysed. Among these, 181 (56 %) cases presented with Candida spp. airway colonization. Colonized and noncolonized patients were similar regarding baseline characteristics, prior exposure to antibiotics and VAP severity. However, mortality rate was greater in patients with fungal airway colonization than in those without (44.2 versus 31.0 %, respectively; p = 0.02). In addition, MDR bacteria isolation was 31.5 % in patients with Candida spp. colonization versus 23.2 % in those without (p = 0.13). Moreover, Candida spp. airway colonization was one independent risk factor for MDR bacteria isolation [odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95 % confidence interval 1.05-3.05; p = 0.03], in addition to the time elapsed between intensive care unit (ICU) admission and VAP suspicion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected VAP, Candida spp. airway colonization is frequent and associated with increased risk for MDR bacteria isolation. This could worsen outcome and should therefore be considered when choosing an empiric antibiotic therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Mucosa/microbiology , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas Infections/mortality , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Respiratory Mucosa/metabolism , Risk Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...