Conjunctival conveyance of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic and non-severe symptomatic COVID-19 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of ocular conveyance of SARS-CoV-2 has been well described for severe/hospitalized cases, but scarcely reported in asymptomatic and non-severe patients, who are unaware that they are carriers. MATERIAL & METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study quantitatively evaluated SARS-CoV-2 shedding on the ocular surface (OS). Conjunctival testing was suggested to all hospital personnel being screened by nasopharyngeal (NP) SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Disease symptoms were evaluated using a standardized questionnaire and telephone follow-up 6±3 months later for disease evolution (recovery with/without severe disease). RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty seven patients were included. From 46 NP SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects (cycle threshold [CT]=24.2±7.1), 13% tested positive at the OS (CT=36.4±2.8). Most SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects were symptomatic (n=40, 87%), while 6 were asymptomatic (being tested as contact cases). Systemic symptoms were not significantly different in OS-positive vs OS-negative subjects, although headache tended to be more frequent in OS-positives (83% vs 54%, P=0.06). None of the OS-positive subjects reported ocular symptoms and none developed severe disease requiring hospitalization or oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 shedding at the OS may occur in asymptomatic and non-severe COVID-19 individuals (including those absent of ocular symptoms). However, the high RT-PCR CT values attained may indicate a low risk of transmissibility via this route.

Treatment for tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in 34 HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) frequently follows the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in patients with tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. Treatment recommendations are nearly exclusively based on expert opinion. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes of patients treated using various strategies for TB-IRIS. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of patients treated in Paris hospitals from 1996 to 2008, we describe TB-IRIS outcome, frequency of relapses and CD4 cell count changes after 12 months of ART for the following strategies: no treatment, interrupted ART and use of steroids. RESULT: Among 34 patients, TB-IRIS outcome was favourable in 10/10 with no treatment, 11/13 with ART interruption, 3/3 with ART interruption and simultaneous use of steroids and 8/8 with steroids alone. Relapses were observed in both the ART interruption (6/13, 46%) and steroids (4/8, 50%) groups, but were less frequent in the no-treatment group (1/10, 10%). Steroids were prescribed in 61% of the patients and had no significant side effects; steroid use was associated with a trend towards a lower median CD4 cell count at 12 months of ART compared to the others (230 vs. 322 cells/mm(3)), despite no baseline differences. CONCLUSION: TB-IRIS outcome was favourable regardless of the therapeutic strategies employed. Although steroids were widely used and well-tolerated, an initial wait-and-see attitude in the case of non-severe IRIS remains an interesting strategy to be evaluated.

Effects of corticosteroids and immunosuppressors on idiopathic inflammatory myopathy related myocarditis evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy has been recognised as an important prognostic factor, but treatment remains empirical. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of corticosteroids and immunosuppressors on myocarditis in patients with inflammatory myopathies. METHODS: Patients with inflammatory myositis of recent onset who had not received treatment were evaluated for associated myocarditis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and reinvestigated after treatment with high dose corticosteroids and immunosuppressors. RESULTS: Four patients with histologically proven myositis were included. Two patients with polymyositis had cardiac clinical symptoms. Two other patients with dermatomyositis and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis-polymyositis overlap syndrome were asymptomatic. In three cases the usual conventional screening tests were normal. For all patients an area of contrast enhancement and hypokinesia detected by cardiac MRI was markedly reduced after treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressors for 6 months. CONCLUSION: Treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone followed by prednisone and immunosuppressive therapy seems to be effective for treating myocardial involvement in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, either alone or presenting as overlap syndromes. Cardiovascular MRI is a non-invasive technique that may be a powerful tool for diagnosis and monitoring of myocardial inflammation in this setting.

[Spondylarthropathies and anti-TNFalpha drugs]. / Spondylarthropathies et médicaments anti-TNFalpha.

PURPOSE: Spondylarthropathies are a heterogeneous group of disorders including ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, and undifferentiated spondylarthropathies. These diseases are characterised by inflammation in the spine, sacroiliac joints, entheses, peripheral joints, and a strong association with HLA-B27; they may cause severe destruction and/or ankylosis in a minority of patients. Conventional treatment includes non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injections, and DMARDs such as sulfasalazine in patients with peripheral arthritis. TNFalpha appears as an important actor in the pathogenesis of spondylarthropathies. METHOD AND RESULTS: Among the anti-TNFalpha drugs, etanercept and infliximab have proved to be effective in the symptomatic treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. A clinical relapse was observed within a few weeks after treatment discontinuation in a majority of patients. Potential beneficial effects on the destructive and/or ankylosing evolution remains to be confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with active, severe and refractory spondylarthropathies are potential candidates for treatment with anti-TNFalpha drugs. Taking into account not only the efficacy but also the side effects, with rare but potentially severe complications such as tuberculosis or other opportunistic infections, and the relatively high cost of these drugs, preliminary criteria for the initiation, monitoring and discontinuation of these drugs in the treatment of spondylarthropathies were proposed. Long-term follow-up in large populations of patients with spondylarthropathies is necessary to better define the benefit/risk/cost ratio of anti-TNFalpha drugs.

Inflammatory eye, skin, and bowel disease in spondyloarthritis: genetic, phenotypic, and environmental factors.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the nature of the interrelationship between inflammatory disease of the spine/joints, skin, eye, and bowel [i.e., ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriasis, iritis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)]. METHODS: The study used 4 approaches: (1) analysis of the prevalence of secondary disorders within the AS individual (chi-square and matched pair analysis); (2) study of the temporal relationship between the onset of the different conditions; (3) evaluation of the prevalence of disease among first degree relatives; and (4) influence of secondary disorders on outcome of AS. RESULTS: 1. Among 3287 patients with AS, more than expected had either spondylitis associated with multiple co-disorders or pure AS (with no co-diseases); fewer than expected had AS plus a single co-disease (chi-square = 32.2, p < 0.001). In a matched pair analysis, patients with AS and a secondary disorder were more likely to have an additional concomitant disease, e.g., IBD-AS (n = 335) patients had a higher prevalence of iritis [45.4% vs 36.7%; OR 1.4 (1.1-2.0)] or psoriasis [23.9% vs 14.3%; OR 1.9 (1.3-2.8)] than controls. 2. Among our database subjects, the symptomatic onset of the spinal disease precedes or is contemporaneous with gut, skin, and eye involvement (matched pair t test, p < 0.001). 3. Patients with multiple disorders predict the highest prevalence of co-diseases (i.e., psoriasis, IBD, iritis, or AS) within family members, followed by those AS patients with only IBD, psoriasis, or iritis in descending order. 4. Both psoriasis and IBD increase severity in terrms of function and disease activity of AS in the patient. Radiological change is greatest for those AS subjects with iritis. CONCLUSION: There is a striking overlap within patients and family members of rheumatological, dermatological, and gastroenterological diseases. The susceptibility genes of these co-disorders appear to overlap with each other and with AS: 1. A patient with 2 inflammatory conditions is at an increased risk of developing an additional related inflammatory disorder. 2. Those with enteropathic spondylarthritis would appear to carry the greatest genetic load in terms of first degree relatives developing inflammatory conditions (including psoriasis and iritis that are not seen in the index IBD-AS patient). 3. The secondary disorders do not precede AS (arguing against psoriasis and IBD allowing for an environmental conduit to pathogenic triggers in AS). The susceptibility factors for these inflammatory conditions may be additive or have a synergistic effect on each other. There is evidence for a shared gene hypothesis.