Risk of Thyroid Cancer Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Solid organ transplant recipients have an elevated incidence of thyroid cancer. We evaluated a wide range of potential risk factors in a cohort of 229 300 U.S. solid organ transplant recipients linked with 15 stage/regional cancer registries (1987-2012). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, year of transplantation, and time since transplantation. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death and/or graft failure were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, and year of transplantation. After transplantation, 356 thyroid cancers were diagnosed. Thyroid cancer incidence was 2.50-fold higher in transplant recipients than the general population (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-2.77). Among recipients of different organs, kidney recipients had the highest incidence of thyroid cancer (IRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.53). Elevated thyroid cancer incidence was associated with cholestatic liver disease/cirrhosis as an indication for liver transplantation (IRR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.09-2.63), hypertensive nephrosclerosis as an indication for kidney transplantation (IRR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94), and longer prior dialysis among kidney recipients (5+ vs. <1 year, IRR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.32-2.80; p-trend <0.01). Posttransplantation diagnosis of thyroid cancer was associated with modestly increased risk of death (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.73). Overall, our results suggest that end-stage organ disease and longer duration of dialysis may contribute to higher thyroid cancer incidence in transplant recipients.

Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma Among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy following kidney transplantation. We describe RCC risk and examine RCC risk factors among US kidney recipients (1987-2010). The Transplant Cancer Match Study links the US transplant registry with 15 cancer registries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to compare RCC risk (overall and for clear cell [ccRCC] and papillary subtypes) to the general population. Associations with risk factors were assessed using Cox models. We identified 683 RCCs among 116 208 kidney recipients. RCC risk was substantially elevated compared with the general population (SIR 5.68, 95% confidence interval 5.27-6.13), especially for papillary RCC (SIR 13.3 versus 3.98 for ccRCC). Among kidney recipients, RCC risk was significantly elevated for blacks compared to whites (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50) and lower in females than males (HR 0.56). RCC risk increased with prolonged dialysis preceding transplantation (p-trend < 0.0001). Risk was variably associated for RCC subtypes with some medical conditions that were indications for transplantation: ccRCC risk was reduced with polycystic kidney disease (HR 0.54), and papillary RCC was increased with hypertensive nephrosclerosis (HR 2.02) and vascular diseases (HR 1.86). In conclusion, kidney recipients experience substantially elevated risk of RCC, especially for papillary RCC, and multiple factors contribute to these cancers.

Comparison of Cancer Diagnoses Between the US Solid Organ Transplant Registry and Linked Central Cancer Registries.

US transplant centers are required to report cancers in transplant recipients to the transplant network. The accuracy and completeness of these data, collected in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), are unknown. We compared diagnoses in the SRTR and 15 linked cancer registries for colorectal, liver, lung, breast, prostate and kidney cancers; melanoma; and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Among 187 384 transplants, 9323 cancers were documented in the SRTR or cancer registries. Only 36.8% of cancers were in both, with 47.5% and 15.7% of cases additionally documented solely in cancer registries or the SRTR, respectively. Agreement between the SRTR and cancer registries varied (kappa = 0.28 for liver cancer and kappa = 0.52-0.66 for lung, prostate, kidney, colorectum, and breast cancers). Upon evaluation, some NHLs documented only in cancer registries were identified in the SRTR as another type of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Some SRTR-only cases were explained by miscoding (colorectal cancer instead of anal cancer, metastases as lung or liver cancers) or missed matches with cancer registries, partly due to recipients' outmigration from catchment areas. Estimated sensitivity for identifying cancer was 52.5% for the SRTR and 84.3% for cancer registries. In conclusion, SRTR cancer data are substantially incomplete, limiting their usefulness for surveillance and research.

Cancers among US organ donors: a comparison of transplant and cancer registry diagnoses.

Transmission of cancer is a life-threatening complication of transplantation. Monitoring transplantation practice requires complete recording of donor cancers. The US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) captures cancers in deceased donors (beginning in 1994) and living donors (2004). We linked the SRTR (52,599 donors, 110,762 transplants) with state cancer registries. Cancer registries identified cancers in 519 donors: 373 deceased donors (0.9%) and 146 living donors (1.2%). Among deceased donors, 50.7% of cancers were brain tumors. Among living donors, 54.0% were diagnosed after donation; most were cancers common in the general population (e.g. breast, prostate). There were 1063 deceased donors with cancer diagnosed in the SRTR or cancer registry, and the SRTR lacked a cancer diagnosis for 107 (10.1%) of these. There were 103 living donors with cancer before or at donation, diagnosed in the SRTR or cancer registry, and the SRTR did not have a cancer diagnosis for 43 (41.7%) of these. The SRTR does not record cancers after donation in living donors and so missed 81 cancers documented in cancer registries. In conclusion, donor cancers are uncommon, but lack of documentation of some cases highlights a need for improved ascertainment and reporting by organ procurement organizations and transplant programs.

Does alcohol increase breast cancer risk in African-American women? Findings from a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol is an important risk factor for breast cancer in Caucasian women, but the evidence in African-American (AA) women is limited and results are inconclusive. METHODS: Associations between recent and lifetime drinking and breast cancer risk were evaluated in a large sample of AA women from a case-control study in New York and New Jersey. Multivariable logistic regression models provided odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was no association between recent drinking and breast cancer risk, even when stratified by menopausal status or by hormone receptor status. A borderline decreased risk with increased lifetime consumption was found (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.58-1.03), which was stronger among women who drank when under 20 years of age (OR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89), regardless of menopausal or hormone receptor status. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer risk associated with recent alcohol consumption was not apparent in AA women, while early age drinking seemed to decrease risk. This is the first investigation on recent and lifetime drinking in subgroups and drinking during different age periods in AA women. If findings are replicated, racial differences in biological pathways involving alcohol and its metabolites should be explored.

Axillary lymph node metastases associated with small invasive breast carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years the proportion of invasive breast carcinomas measuring < or = 1 cm has increased progressively. Information regarding the effect of clinical and histologic characteristics on the frequency of lymph node metastases associated with small invasive breast carcinomas is limited. METHODS: A review of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data was performed using cases diagnosed between January 1988 through December 1993. A total of 12,950 patients with invasive breast carcinomas measuring < or = 1 cm undergoing a resection of the primary tumor and an axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The effect of clinical and histologic characteristics on the frequency of lymph node metastases was reviewed. RESULTS: The frequency of lymph node metastases associated with T1a tumors was less than that observed from T1b tumors (9.6% vs. 14.3%; P < 0.001). Tumors with favorable histology (mucinous, papillary, and tubular carcinomas) had a lower frequency of lymph node metastases compared with all other histologic types (3.9% vs. 13.9%; P < 0.001). Increasing histologic grade was associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastases ranging from 7.8% in Grade 1 tumors to 21.0% in Grade 4 tumors (P < 0.001). Increasing patient age was associated with a progressively decreasing frequency of associated axillary lymph node metastases ranging from 22.6% in women age < 40 years to 10.2% in women age > or = 70 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cases in which an axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided are those with an associated frequency of lymph node metastases < or = 5%, including T1a and T1b mucinous and tubular carcinomas, T1a papillary carcinomas, and T1a Grade 1 carcinomas.

The risk of subsequent primary carcinoma of the pancreas in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the pancreas is the fifth leading cancer in the U.S. and has the poorest survival rate of the major malignancies. Recent studies have reported an increased risk of carcinoma of the pancreas in malignant melanoma-prone kindreds and have suggested a link between malignant melanoma and pancreas carcinoma and mutations in the p16INK4 gene. This study evaluates the risk of carcinoma of the pancreas in a population-based cohort of patients with malignant melanoma. METHODS: The malignant melanoma patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The cohort was followed within the SEER system to ascertain the occurrence of subsequent microscopically confirmed primary carcinoma of the pancreas from January 1973 through December 1993. The time of follow-up was expressed as person-years of observation. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 43,781 malignant melanoma patients providing 263,528 person-years of follow-up. A nearly 2-fold increased risk of subsequent carcinoma of the pancreas in patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma before age 50 years was observed (SIR = 1.76; 95% CI = 0.80-3.34) and the greatest estimated risk occurred in young white females (SIR = 2.27; 95% CI = 0.73-5.30). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide some evidence in support of observations in recent studies that not only a family history of malignant melanoma but also malignant melanoma diagnosed at an early age may be associated with the subsequent development of carcinoma of the pancreas. Further research with larger numbers of melanoma patients is necessary to explore these potential associations.

Lung cancer in young patients: analysis of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

PURPOSE: A large community-based cancer registry was analyzed to determine if the clinicopathologic characteristics and/or survival rates of lung cancer patients under 50 years of age at diagnosis differ from those of patients 50 years of age or greater at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data regarding demographics, stage, histology, initial therapy, and survival were obtained on all patients with primary bronchogenic carcinoma registered in the metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry from 1973 to 1992. RESULTS: Of 31,266 patients, 9.0% were under 50 years of age at diagnosis. Females (40.1% v 31.2%; P < .001) and blacks (28.7% v 21.9%, P < .001) were overrepresented in the younger group compared with the older group. Younger patients had a significantly higher incidence of adenocarcinoma and were less likely to present with local-stage disease (18.6% v 25.2%; P < .001). Younger patients were significantly more likely to undergo surgery and/or combined-modality therapy. Relative survival at 5 years was significantly better in the younger group (16.1% v 13.4%; P < .001), mainly because of better survival in patients with local-stage disease (48.7% v 35.4%; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, advanced-stage, nonsurgical initial therapy, age 50 years or greater at diagnosis, and male gender were independent negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The overrepresentation of females and blacks in the group of younger patients with lung cancer suggests an increased susceptibility to lung carcinogens in these populations. Overall, this study suggests that lung cancer is not a more aggressive disease in younger patients and that all patients with lung cancer should be managed along the same therapeutic guidelines.

Risk of multiple primary cancers in prostate cancer patients in the Detroit metropolitan area: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of excess risk for second primary cancers (SPC) in prostate cancer patients have been observed for urinary bladder, other sites in the urinary tract, and hematolymphopoietic tissues in several, but not all, previously reported cohort studies. METHODS: The risk of SPC was evaluated in 9,794 Detroit metropolitan-area men originally diagnosed with carcinoma of the prostate during 1973-1982. The cohort was assembled using Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry data and followed until December 31, 1993. RESULTS: The observed number of SPC of all sites was similar to the expected number in the cohort. A significant excess of invasive SPC of the urinary bladder [Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34-1.83] was observed in this cohort, but after excluding the first 2 months after prostate cancer diagnosis, the excess (SIR = 1.06) was no longer statistically significant. The cumulative proportion of patients with prostate cancer who developed bladder cancer during a follow-up interval of 20 years was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.1-6.9%). The patients who received first-course radiation treatment were observed to be at increased risk for bladder SPC (all stages; SIR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02) when compared to the Detroit-area male population. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the importance of continuing medical surveillance for urinary bladder second primary cancers in patients with prostate cancer, but are reassuring in that the magnitude of relative and absolute risks does not suggest deterring adverse effects of radiation treatment or intrinsic risks for neoplasms in other organs or tissues.