Point-of-care ultrasound for non-vascular invasive procedures in critically ill neonates and children: current status and future perspectives.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been established as an essential bedside tool for real-time image guidance of invasive procedures in critically ill neonates and children. While procedural guidance using POCUS has become the standard of care across many adult medicine subspecialties, its use has more recently gained popularity in neonatal and pediatric medicine due in part to improvement in technology and integration of POCUS into physician training programs. With increasing use, emerging data have supported its adoption and shown improvement in pediatric outcomes. Procedures that have traditionally relied on physical landmarks, such as thoracentesis and lumbar puncture, can now be performed under direct visualization using POCUS, increasing success, and reducing complications in our most vulnerable patients. In this review, we describe a global and comprehensive use of POCUS to assist all steps of different non-vascular invasive procedures and the evidence base to support such approach. CONCLUSION: There has been a recent growth of supportive evidence for using point-of-care ultrasound to guide neonatal and pediatric percutaneous procedural interventions. A global and comprehensive approach for the use of point-of-care ultrasound allows to assist all steps of different, non-vascular, invasive procedures. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Point-of-care ultrasound has been established as a powerful tool providing for real-time image guidance of invasive procedures in critically ill neonates and children and allowing to increase both safety and success. WHAT IS NEW: • A global and comprehensive use of point-of-care ultrasound allows to assist all steps of different, non-vascular, invasive procedures: from diagnosis to semi-quantitative assessment, and from real-time puncture to follow-up.

Point-of-care ultrasound for the evaluation of venous cannula position in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify venous cannula position in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and compare with conventional imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 37 infants on ECMO with 51 POCUS studies between January 2017 and October 2019. Studies were reviewed for identification of venous cannula location and compared with plain radiography and echocardiography. Kappa statistic and predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: Venous cannula tip position was identified in 90% of POCUS studies. Fifty percent of the cannula tips were malpositioned. Plain radiography, the most commonly used method for evaluating tip position, showed poor agreement (57%) with POCUS (kappa 0.13). There was substantial agreement (89%) between echocardiography and POCUS (kappa 0.78). CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that POCUS is more accurate than plain radiography for the evaluation of ECMO venous cannula position. Adoption of this practice may prevent potentially catastrophic ECMO complications.

Abnormalities in serum biomarkers correlate with lower cardiac index in the Fontan population.

BACKGROUND: Fontan survivors have depressed cardiac index that worsens over time. Serum biomarker measurement is minimally invasive, rapid, widely available, and may be useful for serial monitoring. The purpose of this study was to identify biomarkers that correlate with lower cardiac index in Fontan patients. Methods and results This study was a multi-centre case series assessing the correlations between biomarkers and cardiac magnetic resonance-derived cardiac index in Fontan patients ⩾6 years of age with biochemical and haematopoietic biomarkers obtained ±12 months from cardiac magnetic resonance. Medical history and biomarker values were obtained by chart review. Spearman's Rank correlation assessed associations between biomarker z-scores and cardiac index. Biomarkers with significant correlations had receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve estimated. In total, 97 cardiac magnetic resonances in 87 patients met inclusion criteria: median age at cardiac magnetic resonance was 15 (6-33) years. Significant correlations were found between cardiac index and total alkaline phosphatase (-0.26, p=0.04), estimated creatinine clearance (0.26, p=0.02), and mean corpuscular volume (-0.32, p<0.01). Area under the curve for the three individual biomarkers was 0.63-0.69. Area under the curve for the three-biomarker panel was 0.75. Comparison of cardiac index above and below the receiver operating characteristic curve-identified cut-off points revealed significant differences for each biomarker (p<0.01) and for the composite panel [median cardiac index for higher-risk group=2.17 L/minute/m2 versus lower-risk group=2.96 L/minute/m2, (p<0.01)]. CONCLUSIONS: Higher total alkaline phosphatase and mean corpuscular volume as well as lower estimated creatinine clearance identify Fontan patients with lower cardiac index. Using biomarkers to monitor haemodynamics and organ-specific effects warrants prospective investigation.

Cardiac magnetic resonance and the need for routine cardiac catheterization in single ventricle patients prior to Fontan: a comparison of 3 groups: pre-Fontan CMR versus cath evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) can replace catheterization (cath) for routine evaluation prior to Fontan and under what circumstances CMR and cath are used together. BACKGROUND: Routine cath prior to Fontan has been utilized for years; noninvasive methods, however, may be sufficient. METHODS: This study reviews clinical data in 119 consecutive patients investigating 3 groups: those who underwent CMR alone (MR; n = 41), cath alone (C; n = 41), or both cath and CMR (C+M; n = 37) prior to Fontan. RESULTS: No clinically significant differences were noted in patient characteristics, hemodynamics, or clinical status prior to or after surgery between the C and MR groups. CMR added information in 82%. There were no discrepant findings between CMR and cath data in the C+M group. Diagnostic success was ≥95% in all groups. Of those undergoing Fontan completion, the C+M group had similar outcomes to C and MR; C and CMR were utilized in combination to assess aortopulmonary collaterals or the need for an intervention or evaluate its success. Echo could not delineate pulmonary arterial anatomy in 46% to 53% of patients. The C+M and C groups were exposed to 6.8 ± 4.1 mSv of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Single ventricle patients not requiring an intervention can undergo successful Fontan completion with CMR and echo alone with similar short-term outcomes to C, which was used as a control, preventing an invasive test and exposure to radiation. CMR can add information in a significant number of patients. Cath and CMR are utilized together for interventions and assessment of aortopulmonary collaterals.

Comparison and usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance versus computed tomography in infants six months of age or younger with aortic arch anomalies without deep sedation or anesthesia.

The present project investigated whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of aortic arch anomalies can be performed successfully in infants <6 months of age without the use of cardiac anesthesia or deep sedation. We performed a retrospective review of infants ≤6 months old from 2005 to 2009 who underwent either CMR or computed tomography angiography to investigate aortic arch abnormalities. The CMR procedure used a "feed and swaddle" protocol without deep sedation or cardiac anesthesia. Of the 52 infants referred for CMR, 24 underwent the feed and swaddle protocol (aged 2.6 ± 1.4 months). One patient awoke during the study, and examination of the remaining 23 yielded a definitive diagnosis (success rate 96%). The scanning time was 6.2 ± 3.1 minutes, with the large airways evaluation accounting for 1/2 the time. Single-shot axial steady-state free precession, in which the definitive diagnosis was made, accounted for 0.59 ± 0.3 minutes. Fifteen infants were diagnosed with a vascular ring. Of the 8 infants who underwent surgery, the diagnostic accuracy was 100%. During the same period, 19 patients, who had undergone computed tomography angiography (aged 1.67 ± 1.20 months), were referred for aortic arch evaluation. Of these 19 patients, 6 (32%) underwent sedation or anesthesia. The imaging time was 0.08 ± 0.06 minutes, significantly different from the CMR times (p <0.01). However, the overall room times (31.3 ± 22.3 and 35.8 ± 3.86 minutes, respectively) were not different between the CMR and angiographic groups. The radiation dose was 1.41 ± 1.03 mSv. In conclusion, CMR evaluation of aortic arch anomalies in children <6 months old can be successfully completed quickly using a feed and swaddle approach with high diagnostic accuracy. This protocol avoids the risks of sedation, as well as the radiation associated with computed tomography angiography.