Seven-Year Revision Rates for Cochlear Implants in Pediatric and Adult Populations of an Integrated Healthcare System.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts. PATIENTS: Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25). CONCLUSION: We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.

Optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Individualizing the decision-making process using data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry: 2018 OREF award paper.

Despite years of study, controversy remains regarding the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), suggesting that a single graft type is not ideal for all patients. A large community based ACLR Registry that collects prospective data is a powerful tool that captures information and can be analyzed to optimize surgery for individual patients. The studies highlighted in this paper were designed to optimize and individualize ACLR surgery and have led to changes in surgeon behavior and improvements in patient outcomes. Kaiser Permanente (KP) is an integrated health care system with 10.6 million members and more than 50 hospitals. Every KP member who undergoes an ACLR is entered into the Registry, and prospectively monitored. The Registry uses a variety of feedback mechanisms to disseminate Registry findings to the ACLRR surgeons and appropriately influence clinical practices and enhance quality of care. Allografts were found to have a 3.0 times higher risk of revision than bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. Allograft irradiation >1.8 Mrad, chemical graft processing, younger patients, BPTB allograft, and male patients were all associated with a higher risk of revision surgery. By providing feedback to surgeons, overall allograft use has decreased by 27% and allograft use in high-risk patients ≤21 years of age decreased 68%. We have identified factors that influence the outcomes of ACLR. Statement of Clinical Significance: We found that information derived from an ACLR Registry and shared with the participating surgeons directly decreased the use of specific procedures and implants associated with poor outcomes.

Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries.

OBJECTIVE: Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. METHODS: Five European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions, medians and IQRs. Revision incidence rates following primary ACLR were computed. RESULTS: 101 125 ACLR were included: 21 820 in Denmark, 300 in Luxembourg, 17 556 in Norway, 30 422 in Sweden, 2972 in the UK and 28 055 in the US. In all six cohorts, males (range: 56.8%-72.4%) and soccer injuries (range: 14.1%-42.3%) were most common. European countries mostly used autografts (range: 93.7%-99.7%); allograft was most common in the US (39.9%). Interference screw was the most frequent femoral fixation in Luxembourg and the US (84.8% and 42.9%), and suspensory fixation was more frequent in the other countries (range: 43.9%-75.5%). Interference was the most frequent tibial fixation type in all six cohorts (range: 64.8%-98.2%). Three-year cumulative revision probabilities ranged from 2.8% to 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities in patient demographics and injury activity were observed between all cohorts of ACLR. However, graft and fixation choices differed. Revision rates were low. This work, including >100 000 ACLR, is the most comprehensive international description of contemporary practice to date.

Reoperation Rates for Symptomatic Nonunions in Anterior Cervical Fusions From a National Spine Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs) from a national spine registry. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is very little data reported in the literature on reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions after ACDFs. The reported nonunion rates are primarily based on radiographical evidence, although some of these may be asymptomatic. Similarly, there may be symptomatic patients with nonunions who elect not to have a reoperation. We think, however, data from a national spine registry provide a realistic and unbiased assessment of routine cervical spine fusion care and represent a heterogeneous population with varied indications and surgical techniques and are best suited to determine reoperations for symptomatic nonunions. METHODS: Using data from a Spine Implant Registry developed at a large integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente), patients with ACDFs between January 2009 and December 2012 with 2-year follow-up were identified. Patient characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and number of levels fused were extracted from the registry. Reoperations for symptomatic nonunions from the index spinal procedure were identified by chart review. RESULTS: A cohort of 1054 patients with more than 2 years of follow-up were found to have reoperations for nonunions of 0.2%, 2.9%, and 6.5% for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs, respectively. CONCLUSION: A large cohort of ACDF patients with more than 2 years of follow-up had reoperations for nonunion rates significantly lower than reported in the literature for radiographical nonunions. We think our data add to the literature an important parameter (reoperations for nonunion rates) and provide useful information for patients, spine surgeons, and health care payers.

Rate of infection after carpal tunnel release surgery and effect of antibiotic prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: To determine the rate of postoperative wound infection and the association with prophylactic antibiotic use in uncomplicated carpal tunnel release surgery. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective review of all the carpal tunnel release procedures performed between January 1, 2005, and August 30, 2007. Data reviewed included the use of prophylactic antibiotics, diabetic status, and the occurrence of postoperative wound infection. We determined the overall antibiotic usage rate and analyzed the correlation between antibiotic use and the development of postoperative wound infection. RESULTS: The rate of surgical site infections in the 3003 patients who underwent carpal tunnel release surgery (group A) was 11. Antibiotic usage data were available for 2336 patients (group B). Six patients without prophylactic antibiotics had infection, as did 5 patients with prophylactic antibiotics. This difference was not statistically significant. Of the 11 surgical site infections, 4 were deep (organ/space) and 7 superficial (incisional). The number of patients with diabetes in the overall study population was 546, 3 of whom had infections. This was not statistically different from the nondiabetic population infection rate (8 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The overall infection rate after carpal tunnel release surgery is low. In addition, the deep (organ/space) infection rate is much lower than previously reported. Antibiotic use did not decrease the risk of infection in this study population, including patients with diabetes. The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in carpal tunnel release surgery is not indicated. Surgeons should carefully consider the risks and benefits of routinely using prophylactic antibiotics in carpal tunnel release surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Does discharge disposition after primary total joint arthroplasty affect readmission rates?

We reviewed 90-day readmission rates for 9150 patients with a primary total hip or knee arthroplasty performed between April 2001 and December 2004. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater or with perioperative complications were excluded. We correlated the readmission rate with discharge disposition to either skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or Home. Of the 9150 patients identified, 1447 were discharged to an SNF. After statistically adjusting for sex, age and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients discharged to SNFs had higher odds of hospital readmission within 90 days of surgery than those discharged home (total hip arthroplasty: odds ratio = 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.2; P = .008; total knee arthroplasty: odds ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.4; P = .01). Healthy patients discharged to SNFs after primary total joint arthroplasty need to be followed closely for complications.

Reliability of the international knee documentation committee radiographic grading system.

BACKGROUND: The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms are commonly used to measure outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The knee examination portion of the IKDC forms includes a radiographic grading system to grade degenerative changes. The interrater and intrarater reliability of this radiographic grading system remain unknown. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the IKDC radiographic grading system will have acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Radiographs of 205 ACL-reconstructed knees were obtained at 5-year follow-up. Specifically, weightbearing posteroanterior radiographs of the operative knee in 35 degrees to 45 degrees of flexion and a lateral radiograph in 30 degrees of flexion were used. The radiographs were independently graded by 2 sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons using the IKDC 2000 standard instructions. One surgeon graded the same radiographs 6 months apart, blinded to patient and prior IKDC grades. The percentage agreement was calculated for each of the 5 knee compartments as defined by the IKDC. Interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 2-way mixed effect model with absolute agreement. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (r(s)) was applied to evaluate intrarater reliability. RESULTS: The interrater agreement between the 2 surgeons was 59% for the medial joint space (ICC = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.56), 54% for the lateral joint space (ICC = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.27-0.58), 49% for the patellofemoral joint (ICC = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.26-0.52), 63% for the anterior joint space (ICC = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.05-0.34), and 44% for the posterior joint space (ICC = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.15-0.40). The intrarater agreement was 83% for the medial joint space (r(s) = .77, P < .001), 86% for the lateral joint space (r(s) = .76, P < .001), 81% for the patellofemoral joint (r(s) = .79, P < .001), 91% for the anterior joint space (r(s) = .48, P < .001), and 69% for the posterior joint space (r(s) = .64, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: While intrarater reliability was acceptable, interrater reliability was poor. These findings suggest that multiple raters may score the same radiographs differently using the IKDC radiographic grading system. The use of a single rater to grade all radiographs when using the IKDC radiographic grading system maximizes reliability.

Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Most patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries do well with activities of daily living even after follow-up in the range of 5 to 15 years. Most can participate in some sports activity if they are inclined to do so, but most will have some limitations in vigorous sports, and only a few will be entirely asymptomatic. The challenge to the clinician is to understand and predict how ACL deficiency in a given patient will affect that patients's life and activities. In counseling patients about treatment after an ACL injury, the clinician can use knee ligament arthrometry measurements and pre-injury sports activity to estimate the risk of injury over the next 5 to 10 years. Meniscus, chondral, and sub-chondral injuries are not uncommon, but rarely require surgical intervention in the early phase of ACL deficiency. The prevalence of clinically significant meniscal damage increases with time, and is associated with increasing disability, surgery, and arthrosis in high-risk patients. Ligament reconstruction has not been shown to prevent arthrosis, but in prospective studies it appears to reduce the risk of subsequent meniscal injury, improve passive anteroposterior knee motion limits, and facilitate return to high-level sporting activities.