ABSTRACT
The current literature clearly supports the use of subtalar and triple arthrodeses for the treatment of end-stage PTTD. There is debate, however, regarding whether or not an isolated fusion is preferable to the triple arthrodesis. Complete evaluation of the patient's deformity and symptoms is imperative before choosing to perform a rearfoot fusion. If the deformity can be isolated to the STJ, then perhaps a limited fusion is appropriate. With the close interrelationship of the subtalar and midtarsal joints, however, it is the authors' opinion that chronic dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon infrequently causes isolated STJ pathology. Perhaps earlier intervention in the process of tendon degeneration, before multiple joint adaptations, would warrant an isolated fusion. We anticipate further research into the advantages of STJ and double arthrodeses over the triple arthrodesis. Clearer identification of the patients in whom these limited fusions are warranted is necessary, especially with respect to adult flatfoot secondary to PTTD. Currently, isolated and combined hindfoot fusions continue to be valuable salvage procedures in the treatment of end-stage arthritic deformities.
Subject(s)
Ankle , Arthrodesis/methods , Foot , Muscular Diseases/surgery , Subtalar Joint/surgery , Tarsal Joints/surgery , Tendons/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthrodesis/adverse effects , Flatfoot/etiology , Flatfoot/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Muscular Diseases/classification , Muscular Diseases/complications , Muscular Diseases/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Qualitative analyses of midfoot stabilization in triple arthrodeses utilizing bone staple versus 4.5-mm cannulated cancellous screw fixation, with and without washers, were performed in fresh cadaveric specimens. Twenty-two trials (11 matched-pair feet) were used for direct comparison. Stiffness, defined as force/displacement, was determined at each talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joint. Ultimate load failure points of each specimen were also calculated. Trial results showed no statistically significant difference in stiffness or ultimate failure between these two forms of midfoot fixation for triple arthrodeses.
