Xenogeneic collagen matrix for periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several clinical trials describe the effectiveness of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) as an alternative option to surgical mucogingival procedures for the treatment of marginal tissue recession and augmentation of insufficient zones of keratinized tissue (KT). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical and patient-centred outcomes of XCM compared to other mucogingival procedures. Applying guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analyses statement, randomized controlled trials were searched for in electronic databases and complemented by hand searching. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and data were analysed using statistical software. A total of 645 studies were identified, of which, six trials were included with 487 mucogingival defects in 170 participants. Overall meta-analysis showed that connective tissue graft (CTG) in conjunction with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) had a significantly higher percentage of complete/mean root coverage and mean recession reduction than XCM. Insufficient evidence was found to determine any significant differences in width of KT between XCM and CTG. The XCM had a significantly higher mean root coverage, recession reduction and gain in KT compared to CAF alone. No significant differences in patient's aesthetic satisfaction were found between XCM and CTG, except for postoperative morbidity in favour of XCM. Operating time was significantly reduced with the use of XCM compared with CTG but not with CAF alone. There is no evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of XCM in achieving greater root coverage, recession reduction and gain in KT compared to CTG plus CAF. Superior short-term results in treating root coverage compared with CAF alone are possible. There is limited evidence that XCM may improve aesthetic satisfaction, reduce postoperative morbidity and shorten the operating time. Further long-term randomized controlled trials are required to endorse the supposed advantages of XCM.

Removable prosthodontic services, including implant-supported overdentures, provided by dentists and denturists.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the provision of removable prosthodontic services, including implant-supported overdentures, by dentists and denturists. A structured questionnaire was mailed to 474 randomly chosen dentists and 156 denturists registered to practise in New Zealand. Information was sought on the range of removable prosthodontic services provided (including implant-supported overdentures) and the professional fees charged for them. From 410 respondents, there was an overall response rate of 67.43%; 290 came from the dentists (males 78.6%, n = 228; females 21.48%, n = 62) and 120 from denturists (males 91.7%, n = 110; females 8.3%, n = 10). Most respondents were over 40 years of age, with one in three denturists (but only one in seven dentists) over 60 years of age. The extent of removable prosthodontic services varied. One-third of dentists referred complete denture patients and denturists referred a similar number of immediate denture cases. Denturists' complete denture, immediate denture and single reline prices were generally lower than those from dentists. Removable partial denture prices were similar. Implant-supported overdentures were recommended for edentulous patients by one-third of the dentists and three out of four denturists. Forty per cent of denturists (but only 10% of dentists) charged

Relative effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushes in elderly patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of a powered toothbrush (Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover 3-D) and a manual soft toothbrush (Oral-B Squish-grip brush) for the control of supragingival plaque and soft tissue inflammation around implants supporting mandibular overdentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample involved 40 edentulous subjects, aged 55-80 years, having 2 unsplinted mandibular implants supporting a complete removable overdenture opposed by a maxillary complete denture. In this single-blinded, randomised, cross-over clinical trial, two 6-week experimental phases were separated by a 2-week wash-out period. 2 weeks prior to each experimental phase (pre-entry visits), implant abutments were polished to remove all plaque and a standardised instruction in the use of the toothbrush was given. Modified plaque and bleeding indices were recorded at the start and end of each experimental period. Mean index scores at each phase were analysed using paired t-test, and the mean number of sites showing a change in plaque or mucositis were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Combined data from 2 different implant systems were considered after controlling for implant type. RESULTS: Only minor changes in plaque and bleeding scores were observed following the two test periods. There were no statistically significant differences between the manual and powered toothbrushes. CONCLUSION: Manual and powered brushes were found to be of comparable efficacy with regard to improvement in peri-implant bleeding and plaque indices.