ABSTRACT
Background: Despite a growth in interest in recent years in the benefits of working co-creatively with the Arts for people living with dementia, little attention has been given to understanding the role of the professional artists within this context. Our main question here is 'How do professional artists apply their skills and knowledge in co-creative arts groups with people with dementia?' This paper has been informed by the insights gained from a series of conversations, observations and journals that were kept by four UK based artists (two musicians and two dancers) who reflexively interrogated what they were doing during the course of an 8-week co-creative arts project with people living with dementia. Methods: The research used an empirical case study methodology, with the authors adopting a thematic approach to the analysis of the data. Results: Thematic analysis resulted in three main themes: Authenticity, Enabling Risk and Togetherness. These themes characterise the skills, techniques and specialised knowledge used by the artists during the co-creative sessions. Conclusions: Following this analysis, the article argues that the beneficial effects for people living with dementia of co-creative art-based work come about through the conscious application by the artists of their shared skills and knowledge, acquired through training and ongoing artistic practice. Rather than an assumption that 'The Arts' are in themselves beneficial for people living with dementia, we must consider the active role played by the artists who are so integral to the process.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The optimal timing of umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants has been contested for years. Previously, it was common practice to clamp the cord immediately after birth. There is now high-quality evidence that delayed cord clamping (DCC) (>60 seconds) reduces mortality in preterm infants by allowing placental transfusion. However, it is unclear how well DCC has been implemented into practice. This study aims to assess current practice of timing of cord clamping for both stable and unstable preterm infants in LMICs, where rates of preterm birth and neonatal mortality are high and where there is the potential to see the greatest benefit from implementation of DCC. METHODS: An online survey was created and, following user-testing, circulated to maternity workers in LMICs via The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), social media and other existing collaborators. Analyses were conducted using SPSS. RESULTS: 70 responses were received across 10 LMICs. 42/70 (60%) participants reported practising DCC for stable preterm infants, compared to only 4/70 (6%) for unstable infants. For stable infants, 22/42 (52%) of those who practised DCC gave their main reason as being "recommended by guidelines". 13/70 (19%) participants said they didn't follow any guidelines for the timing of cord clamping. Only 25/70 (36%) were aware of guidelines for cord clamping in their hospitals, and 9/70 (13%) were aware of related quality improvement projects (QIPs). DISCUSSION: Despite evidence to support the use of DCC, timing of cord clamping in LMICs is variable. Unstable infants requiring stabilisation could benefit most from placental transfusion, yet few respondents practised DCC and few hospitals had QIPs in place. Higher-quality guidelines and training could increase implementation of DCC, and development of affordable equipment to allow bedside resuscitation with the cord intact could aid in reducing neonatal mortality.
