Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr ; 25(3): 3-18, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16120553

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine a convenient communication tool to help educate parents about varying the positions of their new babies. Eighty-eight percent of babies whose parents had received a brochure explaining the importance of early and regularly scheduled "tummy time" were placed in the prone position more than one time a day. Seventeen of 34 babies were started prone before the second week of life. The average Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 locomotion score of the babies regularly placed in prone was significantly higher than that of the babies not regularly placed in prone when tested at 6 months and again at 18 months of age.


Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Infant Care/methods , Parents/education , Posture , Child Development , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Models, Theoretical , Pamphlets , Prone Position , Video Recording
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 92(5): 549-57, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15191024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enzymes have been safely used in laundry products for many years. The risk of developing adverse responses to enzymes in laundry detergents among consumers in countries where hand laundry predominates is expected to be low. OBJECTIVES: To understand how consumers in hand laundry markets used detergent products; to show that use of enzyme-containing detergents did not lead to sensitization in an atopic population with compromised skin; and to show that enzyme detergents did not have an adverse effect on skin condition. METHODS: Women in the rural Philippines were chosen since they do hand laundry for several hours a day, every day. The skin prick test (SPT) tested for the presence of IgE antibody to common aeroallergens and to enzymes in detergent product. Atopic women used enzyme-containing laundry bars for hand laundry and personal cleansing. They also used enzyme-containing laundry granules for hand laundry. All subjects were evaluated by SPT with enzymes over 2 years. Hand and body skin conditions were also evaluated. RESULTS: None of the 1,980 subjects screened for eligibility into the 2-year study were SPT positive to enzymes, including 655 women who used enzyme-containing detergent for up to 1 year. None of the subjects in the study developed IgE to the enzymes. Enzymes had no adverse effect on skin condition or on the development of erosions on the hands. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year study confirms that enzymes are safe for use in laundry products at or below levels tested in the study even when used by atopic consumers under extremely harsh conditions.


Subject(s)
Amylases/immunology , Detergents/adverse effects , Endopeptidases/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Adult , Amylases/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Detergents/chemistry , Endopeptidases/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Middle Aged , Philippines , Prospective Studies , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...