Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.

The possible role that response processes play in Inhibition of Return (IOR), traditionally associated with reduced or inhibited attentional processing of spatially cued target stimuli presented at cue-target intervals longer than 300 ms, is still under debate. Previous psychophysiological studies on response-related Electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and IOR have found divergent results. Considering that the ability to optimize our behavior not only resides in our capacity to inhibit the focus of attention from irrelevant information but also to inhibit or reduce motor activation associated with responses to that information, it is conceivable that response processes are also affected by IOR. In the present study, time-frequency (T-F) analyses were performed on EEG oscillatory activity between 2 and 40 Hz to check whether spatial IOR affects response preparation and execution during a visuospatial attention task. To avoid possible spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects and their interaction with the IOR effects, the stimuli were presented along the vertical meridian of the visual field. The results differed between lower and upper visual fields. In the lower visual field spatial IOR was related to a synchronization in the pre-movement mu band at bilateral precentral and central electrodes, and in the post-movement beta band at contralateral precentral and central electrodes, which may be associated with an attention-driven reduction of somatomotor processing prior to the execution of responses to relevant stimuli presented at previously cued locations followed by a post-movement deactivation of motor areas. In the upper visual field, spatial IOR was associated with a decrease in desynchronization around response execution in the beta band at contralateral postcentral electrodes that might indicate a late (last moment) reduction of motor activation when responding to spatially cued targets. The present results suggest that different response processes are affected by spatial IOR depending on the visual field where the target is presented.

MEG correlates of bimodal encoding of faces and persons' names.

Learning associations between people's faces and names is a universal cognitive function with important social implications. The goal of the present study was to examine brain activity patterns associated with cross-modal encoding of names and faces. Learning face-name pairs was compared to unimodal learning tasks using the same visual and auditory stimuli. Spatiotemporal brain activation profiles were obtained with magnetoencephalography using an automated source estimation method. Results showed activation foci in left (for names) and right (for faces) temporal lobe perisylvian cortices, predominantly right-hemisphere occipital and occipitotemporal regions (for faces), and right hemisphere dorsolateral prefrontal regions during the encoding phase for both types of stimuli presented in isolation. Paired (face-name) stimulus presentation elicited bilateral prefrontal and temporal lobe perisylvian activity for faces and enhanced visual cortex activation in response to names (compared to names in the unpaired condition). These findings indicate distinct patterns of brain activation during the formation of associations between meaningful visual and auditory stimuli.

Visual target processing in high- and low-performing older subjects indexed by P3 component.

AIM: To explore the possible changes in the parameters of the P3 event-related potential (ERP) component among groups of young and older healthy subjects characterized as either high- or low-performers in a visual attention task. METHODS: Both conventional and single-trial analyses of the visual P3 component were performed on each group of subjects. RESULTS: P3 component significantly increased in latency as a function of age. The high-performing older subjects showed the posterior predominance of P3, as in young subjects. However, the low-performing older subjects showed a significant P3 amplitude reduction at posterior locations and topographically more widespread activity. Furthermore, single-trial analysis showed that low-performing older subjects presented higher intertrial variability in P3 latency, few trials with P3 generation, and a reduced P3 amplitude in these trials in whom P3 was generated. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a specific decline in visual target processing in the low-performing older subjects, which would imply a reduction in these attentional brain resources that are allocated to correctly select the relevant stimuli. The implications of this finding for the actual compensation versus dedifferentiation debate in normal aging are discussed.

Functional neuroimaging with MEG: normative language profiles.

The reliability of language-specific brain activation profiles was assessed using Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in five experiments involving ninety-seven normal volunteers of both genders ranging in age from seven to eighty-four years. MEG data were analyzed with a fully automated method to eliminate subjective judgments in the process of deriving the activation profiles. Across all experiments, profiles were characterized by significant bilateral activity centered in the superior temporal gyrus, and in activity lateralized to the left middle temporal gyrus. These features were invariant across age, gender, variation in task characteristics, and mode of stimulus presentation. The absolute amount of activation, however, did decline with age in the auditory tasks. Moreover, contrary to the commonly held belief that left hemisphere dominance for language is greater in men than in women, our data revealed an opposite albeit a not consistently significant trend.

Automatic detection of motion direction changes in the human brain.

The possibility that the visual system is able to register unattended changes is still debated in the literature. However, it is difficult to understand how a sensory system becomes aware of unexpected salient changes in the environment if attention is required for detecting them. The ability to automatically detect unusual changes in the sensory environment is an adaptive function which has been confirmed in other sensory modalities (i.e. audition). This deviance detector mechanism has proven to be based on a preattentive nonrefractory memory-comparison process. To investigate whether such automatic change detection mechanism exists in the human visual system, we recorded event-related potentials to sudden changes in a biologically important feature, motion direction. Unattended sinusoidal gratings varying in motion direction in the peripheral field were presented while subjects performed a central task with two levels of difficulty. We found a larger negative displacement in the electrophysiological response elicited by less frequent stimuli (deviant) at posterior scalp locations. Within the latency range of the visual evoked component N2, this differential response was elicited independently of the direction of motion and processing load. Moreover, the results showed that the negativity elicited by deviants was not related to a differential refractory state between the electrophysiological responses to frequent and infrequent directions of motion, and that it was restricted to scalp locations related to motion processing areas. The present results suggest that a change-detection mechanism sensitive to unattended changes in motion direction may exist in the human visual system.

MMN in the visual modality: a review.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) component is an event-related potential (ERP) that can be elicited by any change in the acoustic environment, and it is related to memory-based, automatic processing mechanisms, and attentional capture processes. This component is well defined in the auditory modality. However, there is still a great controversy about its existence in the visual modality. This paper reviews the studies that are relevant with regard to memory-based, automatic deviance detection ERPs in the visual system. The paper discusses the main strengths and limitations of those studies and suggests what directions should be taken for future research.