Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Rev E ; 99(2-1): 022606, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30934288

ABSTRACT

Natural and artificial self-propelled systems must manage environmental interactions during movement. In complex environments, these interactions include active collisions, in which propulsive forces create persistent contacts with heterogeneities. Due to the driven and dissipative nature of these systems, such collisions are fundamentally different from those typically studied in classical physics. Here we experimentally and numerically study the effects of active collisions on a laterally undulating sensory-deprived robophysical model, whose dynamics are relevant to self-propelled systems across length scales and environments. Interactions with a single rigid post scatter the robot, and this deflection is dominated by head-post contact. These results motivate a model which reduces the snake to a circular particle with two key features: The collision dynamics are set by internal driving subject to the geometric constraints of the post, and the particle has an effective length equal to the wavelength of the snake. Interactions with a single row of evenly spaced posts (with interpost spacing d) produce distributions reminiscent of far-field diffraction patterns: As d decreases, distinct secondary peaks emerge as large deflections become more likely. Surprisingly, we find that the presence of multiple posts does not change the nature of individual collisions; instead, multimodal scattering patterns arise from multiple posts altering the likelihood of individual collisions to occur. As d decreases, collisions near the leading edges of the posts become more probable, and we find that these interactions are associated with larger deflections. Our results, which highlight the surprising dynamics that can occur during active collisions of self-propelled systems, can inform control principles for locomotors in complex terrain and facilitate design of task-capable active matter.

2.
Phys Rev E ; 96(4-1): 042905, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29347540

ABSTRACT

We summarize and numerically compare two approaches for modeling and simulating the dynamics of dry granular matter. The first one, the discrete-element method via penalty (DEM-P), is commonly used in the soft matter physics and geomechanics communities; it can be traced back to the work of Cundall and Strack [P. Cundall, Proc. Symp. ISRM, Nancy, France 1, 129 (1971); P. Cundall and O. Strack, Geotechnique 29, 47 (1979)GTNQA80016-850510.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47]. The second approach, the discrete-element method via complementarity (DEM-C), considers the grains perfectly rigid and enforces nonpenetration via complementarity conditions; it is commonly used in robotics and computer graphics applications and had two strong promoters in Moreau and Jean [J. J. Moreau, in Nonsmooth Mechanics and Applications, edited by J. J. Moreau and P. D. Panagiotopoulos (Springer, Berlin, 1988), pp. 1-82; J. J. Moreau and M. Jean, Proceedings of the Third Biennial Joint Conference on Engineering Systems and Analysis, Montpellier, France, 1996, pp. 201-208]. The DEM-P and DEM-C are manifestly unlike each other: They use different (i) approaches to model the frictional contact problem, (ii) sets of model parameters to capture the physics of interest, and (iii) classes of numerical methods to solve the differential equations that govern the dynamics of the granular material. Herein, we report numerical results for five experiments: shock wave propagation, cone penetration, direct shear, triaxial loading, and hopper flow, which we use to compare the DEM-P and DEM-C solutions. This exercise helps us reach two conclusions. First, both the DEM-P and DEM-C are predictive, i.e., they predict well the macroscale emergent behavior by capturing the dynamics at the microscale. Second, there are classes of problems for which one of the methods has an advantage. Unlike the DEM-P, the DEM-C cannot capture shock-wave propagation through granular media. However, the DEM-C is proficient at handling arbitrary grain geometries and solves, at large integration step sizes, smaller problems, i.e., containing thousands of elements, very effectively. The DEM-P vs DEM-C comparison is carried out using a public-domain, open-source software package; the models used are available online.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...