Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(12): 601-607, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31356446

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of postoperative surgical site infections after plate fixation of the anterior pelvic ring subsequent to preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Level I academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult trauma patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries requiring surgical fixation of the anterior pelvic ring. INTERVENTION: Pelvic plate fixation was performed as a staged procedure after external fixation and PPP/depacking (PPP group; n = 25) or as a single-stage primary internal fixation (control group; n = 87). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of postoperative surgical site infections of the pelvic space. RESULTS: Anterior pelvic plate fixation was performed in 112 patients during a 5-year study period. The PPP group had higher injury severity scores and transfused packed red blood cells than the control group (injury severity score: 46 ± 12.2 vs. 29 ± 1.5; packed red blood cells: 13 ± 10 vs. 5 ± 2; P < 0.05). The mean time until pelvic depacking was 1.7 ± 0.6 days (range: 1-3 days) and 3.4 ± 3.7 days (range: 0-15 days) from depacking until pelvic fracture fixation. Two patients in the PPP group and 8 patients in the control group developed a postoperative infection requiring a surgical revision (8.0% vs. 9.2%; n.s.). Both PPP patients with a pelvic space infection had undergone anterior plate fixation for associated acetabular fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the safety of the PPP protocol for bleeding pelvic ring injuries due to the lack of increased infection rates after fracture fixation. Caution should be applied when considering PPP in patients with associated acetabular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Bone Plates , Female , Fracture Healing , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
JSES Open Access ; 3(1): 54-58, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30984893

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An adequate characterization of 90-day readmissions after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) on a national level remains to be undertaken. As bundled payment models become more prevalent, an improved understanding of readmission data will help to predict resource utilization and expenses. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent elective primary RTSA in 2014 in the National Readmission Database were included in the analysis. Two cohorts were created based on 90-day readmission status. Multivariate analysis was then performed to determine predictors of 90-day readmissions. Reasons for 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions were identified. Total hospital resource utilization was calculated. RESULTS: An estimated 25,196 patients were identified. The 30-, 60-, and 90-day rates of readmissions were 0.6%, 1.2%, and 1.7%, respectively. Diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.78), hypertension (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.28-2.08), paralysis (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.63-7.97), and solid tumor without metastasis (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.21-6.12) were identified as independent predictors of 90-day readmission. Ninety-day readmissions were associated with a significant increase in cost (P = .02). The most common related reason for 90-day readmission was hardware-related complications at all time points. CONCLUSION: Although uncommon, 90-day readmissions after primary RTSA are associated with significant patient morbidity and consequently substantial hospital costs.

3.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 7(1): 2325967118820046, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spine injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes have not been well studied. PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of lumbar spine injuries in NCAA athletes during the 2009/2010 through 2014/2015 academic years utilizing the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program (ISP). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: A voluntary convenience sample of NCAA varsity teams from 25 sports was examined. Mechanism of injury, injury recurrence, and time lost from sport were recorded. Injury rates were calculated as the number of injuries divided by the total number of athlete-exposures (AEs). AEs were defined as any student participation in 1 NCAA-sanctioned practice or competition. Injury rate ratios and injury proportion ratios were calculated to compare the rates within and between sports by event type, season, patient sex, mechanism, injury recurrence, and time lost from sport. Comparisons between sexes were made utilizing data that had both male and female samples. RESULTS: An estimated 37,435 lumbar spine injuries were identified. The overall rate of injuries was 6.01 per 1000 AEs. The rate of injuries was 4.94 per 1000 AEs in men compared with 3.94 per 1000 AEs in women for sex-comparable sports. Men were 1.25 times more likely than women to suffer a lumbar spine injury. Men's football (24.62 injuries/1000 AEs) and women's gymnastics (11.46 injuries/1000 AEs) had the highest rates of lumbar spine injuries. Athletes were 1.83 and 3.71 times more likely to sustain a lumbar spine injury during the preseason than the regular season or postseason, respectively. Noncontact was the most common mechanism of injury (38%). Injury recurrence was most common in men's outdoor track (58%). Most injuries resulted in less than 24 hours of time loss from event participation (61%). CONCLUSION: The rate of lumbar spine injuries was high in NCAA athletes, and injuries commonly recurred (20%). In general, men were more likely to sustain a lumbar spine injury compared with women. Higher injury rates occurred during competition and via a noncontact mechanism of injury. In addition to prevention programs, reconditioning programs should be considered to prevent these injuries.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...