Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Hand Surg Glob Online ; 5(4): 585-587, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37521541

ABSTRACT

Ulnar nerve compression associated with the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle (AE) is an uncommon cause of peripheral nerve compression at the elbow. It is often seen in young women with a hypertrophied or severely edematous muscle. Its causes are unclear. Numerous observed features, such as a hypertrophic AE, a palpable mass on the medial side of the elbow, and the dynamic nature of symptoms, have sparked controversy in the literature. Its clinical presentation is often insidious, and occasionally symptoms only occur in prolonged positions (dynamic compression). EMG tests are usually negative, and a correct diagnosis relies on imaging. We present the case of a 21-year-old student and clarinet player who presented with dynamic compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow associated with AE. Much remains to be elucidated about the incidence, pathophysiology, and contributing factors of this peripheral form of cubital compression. It may be time to revisit this condition.

2.
J Hand Surg Am ; 48(12): 1274.e1-1274.e6, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718584

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There appears to be controversy regarding differing patient and physician perceptions of adverse effects (AEs) in the treatment of Dupuytren disease with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH). The aim of this study was to compare the number, type, and severity of AEs perceived and reported by patients and by their physician METHODS: To assess AEs following CCH injection in a standardized way, patients were given a list of predefined complications and asked to rate their severity on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (serious) to 4 (insignificant). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included. Patients reported fewer AEs than their physician (mean, 1.48 vs 2.18). There was no agreement between physician- and patient-reported AEs except for skin lacerations, which showed fair agreement (κ = 0.257). CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians differ in their evaluation of AEs due to CCH treatment in Dupuytren disease. A fair level of agreement was observed for skin lacerations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater consensus is needed when defining AEs associated with CCH in the treatment of Dupuytren disease.


Subject(s)
Dupuytren Contracture , Lacerations , Humans , Dupuytren Contracture/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Lacerations/etiology , Injections, Intralesional , Clostridium histolyticum , Microbial Collagenase/adverse effects
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(10): 3774-3781, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36028430

ABSTRACT

Treatment success in Dupuytren´s disease has traditionally been assessed by clinical examination and physical measures, but based on patient orientation, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to quantify treatment impacts and health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to compare the most widely used PROMS in Dupuytren´s disease, their psychometric properties, and their association with objectively measured hand function. We show a prospective study in which two disease-specific questionnaires (URAM scale and SDSS) and two hand-specific questionnaires (briefMHQ and PEM) were administered before and a month after the treatment with collagenase. Psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, internal and external responsiveness, reliability, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID)) were calculated for all the questionnaires. Ninety-two completed both sets of questionnaires. Pre- and post-treatment scores were strongly correlated (Spearman rho >0.6) for all questionnaires. High internal consistency (Cronbach alpha >0.88) was observed for all the questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was also significant, with an ICC of >0.50 in all cases. The MCID was similar for three of the questionnaires (URAM, 11.528/45=0.256; SDSS, 5.079/20=0.254; and PEM, 21.542/77=0.215) and somewhat lower for the briefMHQ (10.617/60=0.177). No correlations were observed between treatment outcome and treated hand (r = 0.107; p = 0.31), joint (r = 0.163; p = 0.12), or finger (r = -0.151; p = 0.15). In conclusion, we did not find that any one questionnaire performed better than the other in detecting perceived changes in health status among patients with Dupuytren´s disease treated with collagenase.


Subject(s)
Dupuytren Contracture , Dupuytren Contracture/diagnosis , Dupuytren Contracture/therapy , Humans , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...