Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 181(2): 391-401, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32323103

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: AE37 and GP2 are HER2 derived peptide vaccines. AE37 primarily elicits a CD4+ response while GP2 elicits a CD8+ response against the HER2 antigen. These peptides were tested in a large randomized trial to assess their ability to prevent recurrence in HER2 expressing breast cancer patients. The primary analyses found no difference in 5-year overall disease-free survival (DFS) but possible benefit in subgroups. Here, we present the final landmark analysis. METHODS: In this 4-arm, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center phase II trial, disease-free node positive and high-risk node negative breast cancer patients enrolled after standard of care therapy. Six monthly inoculations of vaccine (VG) vs. control (CG) were given as the primary vaccine series with 4 boosters at 6-month intervals. Demographic, safety, immunologic, and DFS data were evaluated. RESULTS: 456 patients were enrolled; 154 patients in the VG and 147 in CG for AE37, 89 patients in the VG and 91 in CG for GP2. The AE37 arm had no difference in DFS as compared to CG, but pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed a trend towards benefit in advanced stage (p = 0.132, HR 0.573 CI 0.275-1.193), HER2 under-expression (p = 0.181, HR 0.756 CI 0.499-1.145), and triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.266, HR 0.443 CI 0.114-1.717). In patients with both HER2 under-expression and advanced stage, there was significant benefit in the VG (p = 0.039, HR 0.375 CI 0.142-0.988) as compared to CG. The GP2 arm had no significant difference in DFS as compared to CG, but on subgroup analysis, HER2 positive patients had no recurrences with a trend toward improved DFS (p = 0.052) in VG as compared to CG. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II trial reveals that AE37 and GP2 are safe and possibly associated with improved clinical outcomes of DFS in certain subgroups of breast cancer patients. With these findings, further evaluations are warranted of AE37 and GP2 vaccines given in combination and/or separately for specific subsets of breast cancer patients based on their disease biology.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/immunology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/immunology , Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Peptide Fragments , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Single-Blind Method , Survival Rate , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology
2.
J Surg Educ ; 77(4): 729-732, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique challenge to surgical residency programs. Due to the restrictions recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other organizations, the educational landscape for surgical residents is rapidly changing. In addition, the time course of these changes is undefined. METHODS: We attempt to define the scope of the problem of maintaining surgical resident education while maintaining the safety of residents, educators, and patients. Within the basic framework of limiting in-person gatherings, postponing or canceling elective operations in hospitals, and limiting rotations between sites, we propose innovative solutions to maintain rigorous education. RESULTS: We propose several innovative solutions including the flipped classroom model, online practice questions, teleconferencing in place of in-person lectures, involving residents in telemedicine clinics, procedural simulation, and the facilitated use of surgical videos. Although there is no substitute for hands-on learning through operative experience and direct patient care, these may be ways to mitigate the loss of learning exposure during this time. CONCLUSIONS: These innovative solutions utilizing technology may help to bridge the educational gap for surgical residents during this unprecedented circumstance. The support of national organizations may be beneficial in maintaining rigorous surgical education.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , General Surgery/education , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Telecommunications/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Curriculum , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , United States , Virtual Reality
3.
Clin Immunol ; 201: 48-54, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817999

ABSTRACT

The development of HER2-targeted therapy has decreased recurrence rates and improved survival, transforming the natural history of HER2-positive breast cancer. However only a minority of breast cancer patients benefit as these agents are not used in patients with tumors expressing low levels of HER2. Preclinical data suggests a synergistic action of HER2-targeted vaccination with trastuzumab. We report the initial safety interim analysis of a phase II trial that enrolled patients with HER2 low-expressing (IHC 1+/2+) breast cancer who were clinically disease-free after standard therapy. Patients were randomized to receive the HER2-peptide vaccine nelipepimut-S + GM-CSF with trastuzumab (vaccine arm) or trastuzumab + GM-CSF (control arm) and were followed for recurrence. A planned analysis that occurred after enrollment of 150 patients showed no significant differences in toxicity between the two arms, including cardiac toxicity. The clinical efficacy of this combination will be reported 6 months after the final patient was enrolled.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Trastuzumab/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stroke Volume/drug effects , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects
4.
Clin Immunol ; 195: 28-35, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30025819

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy, using peptide-based cancer vaccines is being studied to assess its potential in breast cancer. Trials of HLA-restricted peptide vaccines have been difficult to enroll given HLA subtype restrictions. It is necessary to determine the prognostic significance of HLA-status in breast cancer if patients who are ineligible to receive a vaccine due to their HLA-status are used as controls. The impact of targeted tumor associated antigen expression, when it effects eligibility is also important. We examined control patients from two randomized phase II trials that tested HER2-peptide vaccines to determine the effect of HLA-A2 status and HER2 expression on disease-free survival. The analysis showed that HLA-A2-status does not affect disease-free survival, regardless of HER2 expression suggesting that HLA-A2 negative patients can be used as control patients. Additionally, HER2 over-expression was associated with a better disease-free survival in this population, underscoring the need for additional therapies in HER2 low-expressing breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00524277.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , HLA-A2 Antigen/genetics , Immunotherapy/methods , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/immunology , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology , Research Design , Risk , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination , Vaccines, Subunit
5.
Clin Immunol ; 192: 6-13, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29574039

ABSTRACT

In this randomized phase Ib trial, we tested combining the E39 peptide vaccine with a vaccine created from E39', an attenuated version of E39. Patients with breast or ovarian cancer, who were disease-free after standard of care therapy, were enrolled and randomized to one of three arms. Arm EE received six E39 inoculations; arm EE' received three E39 inoculations followed by three E39'; and arm E'E received three E39' inoculations, followed by three E39. Within each arm, the first five patients received 500 µg of peptide and the remainder received 1000 µg. Patients were followed for toxicity, and immune responses were measured. This initial analysis after completion of the primary vaccination series has confirmed the safety of both vaccines. Immune analyses suggest incorporating the attenuated version of the peptide improves immune responses and that sequencing of E39 followed by E39' might produce the optimal immune response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02019524.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Folate Receptors, GPI-Anchored/immunology , Ovarian Neoplasms/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/immunology , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects
6.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 31(1): 17-23, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29379403

ABSTRACT

The management of rectal trauma has often been lumped in with colon trauma when, in fact, it is a unique entity. The anatomic nature of the rectum (with its intra- and extraperitoneal segments) lends itself to unique circumstances when it comes to management and treatment. From the four Ds (debridement, drainage, diversion, and distal irrigation), the management of rectal trauma has made some strides in light of the experiences coming out of the recent conflicts overseas as well as some rethinking of dogma. This article will serve to review the anatomy and types of injuries associated with rectal trauma. A treatment algorithm will also be presented based on our current literature review. We will also address controversial points and attempt to give our opinion in an effort to provide an update on an age-old problem.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...