Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust J Prim Health ; 17(2): 131-4, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21645467

ABSTRACT

Multidisciplinary approaches to primary health care improve outcomes for individuals living with chronic conditions. However, emerging evidence suggests access to allied health professionals in Australia is problematic. This paper reports findings of a telephone survey of allied health professionals' billing practices in one urban area. The survey was undertaken as a quality improvement project in response to the affordability queries raised by patients and carers in the clinical setting. The aim was to determine financial cost of access to allied health professionals in one urban primary health care setting. Participant practices included: physiotherapy (n=21), podiatry (n=8) and dietitians (n=3). Fees were variable, with cost of the initial (assessment) appointment higher than subsequent (follow-up) appointments in 92% of practices. The average out of pocket expenses for assessment and three follow-up appointments ranged from $258 to $302. When available, the Medicare rebate reduced this to $58-106. Bulk billing was not offered. Variable costs, minimal concessions and absence of bulk billing in this confined geographical area creates a cost barrier to access for patients from lower socioeconomic groups and has implications for access to multidisciplinary care in Australian primary health care.


Subject(s)
Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Australia , Humans , Interviews as Topic , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health Services/economics , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data
2.
Aust Health Rev ; 34(4): 414-22, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21108901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Serious and Continuing Illness Policy and Practice Study (SCIPPS) aims to improve the care and support for patients with chronic illness and their family carers. Here we describe the carers' contribution to the self-management partnership and discuss the policy and practice implications that are relevant to improving the support available for informal care in Australia. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of SCIPPS data. Fourteen carers of patients between 45 and 85 years with chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes were conveniently sampled from western Sydney and the Australian Capital Territory. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Key roles that carers perform in the self-management partnership included: home helper; lifestyle coach; advocate; technical care manager; and health information interpreter. Two negative consequences of juggling these roles included: self-neglect and conflict. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid eligibility criteria limit carers' access to essential support programs which underestimates and undervalues their contributions to the self-management partnership. Support services should focus on the development of practical skills to perform the caregiving roles. In addition, health professionals require support to work more effectively with carers to minimise the conflict that can overshadow the care and self-management partnership.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Health Policy , Self Care , Social Support , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australian Capital Territory , Caregivers/psychology , Chronic Disease/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , New South Wales
3.
Med J Aust ; 189(S10): S14-6, 2008 11 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19143579

ABSTRACT

We examined research and implementation activities presented at the Centre for Rheumatic Diseases 2007 Conference and other selected literature to identify common themes and posit some "next steps" required to develop self-management programs in the Australian context. Self-management and self-management support are key aspects of optimal chronic disease care, and are effective if implemented appropriately. Health literacy is the foundation for self-management programs and should be fostered within the whole population. We should invest in research and evaluation of self-management because the evidence base is under-developed and inherently difficult to expand. Because patient, carer, clinician and organisational engagement with self-management and self-management support programs are uneven, we need to prioritise activities designed to engage known hard-to-reach groups. We should strive to improve integration of self-management into clinical, educational and workplace contexts. Education and psychological theories can help guide self-management support.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking/organization & administration , Chronic Disease/therapy , Health Education/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Self Care/methods , Social Support , Australia/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Total Quality Management/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...