Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Water Health ; 18(6): 968-982, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33328368

ABSTRACT

Microbial contamination of drinking water post-municipal treatment is difficult to predict as a risk factor for human health. One method to reduce morbidity or mortality from unpredictable exposures is through point-of-use (POU) treatment devices. The goal of this project was to assess the cost-benefit of POU water treatment at the tap in terms of protection from microbes in drinking water. This project estimated: (1) incidence of acute illness (AI), sequela, and mortality associated with waterborne pathogens; (2) illness reduction rates from using POU devices; and (3) healthcare cost reductions associated with POU devices. Infection rates and costs associated with 10 of the most common waterborne pathogens were identified and used to calculate national annual costs. We estimated 9M AI, 0.6M sequela, and 1,400 mortality cases that occur annually in the USA from these pathogens. The greatest cost-benefit was seen when considering the totality of disease burden reduction (AI, sequela, and mortality) including all pathogens at a national level and applying a 35% infection reduction, resulting in a total cost per averted disease case of $1,815. This study suggests that it is cost-beneficial to prevent water-related illness using POU devices.


Subject(s)
Drinking Water , Water Purification , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Water Microbiology , Water Supply
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 81(6): 506-513, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether exposure to UV germicidal irradiation (UVGI) reduces concentrations of viable aerosolized microorganisms (attenuated strains of common veterinary pathogens) in a simulated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. SAMPLE: 42 air samples seeded with bacteriophage MS2 or attenuated strains of Bordetella bronchiseptica, feline calicivirus, feline herpesvirus-1, canine parvovirus, or canine distemper virus (6/microorganism) or with no microorganisms added (6). PROCEDURES: A simulated HVAC unit was built that included a nebulizer to aerosolize microorganisms suspended in phosphate-buffered water, a fan to produce airflow, 2 UVGI bulb systems, and an impinger for air sampling. Ten-minute trials (3 with UVGI, 3 without UVGI, and 1 negative control) were conducted for each microorganism. Impingers collected microorganisms into phosphate-buffered water for subsequent quantification with culture-based assays. Results for samples yielding no target microorganisms were recorded as the assay's lower limit of detection. Statistical analysis was not performed. RESULTS: The UVGI treatment resulted in subjectively lower concentrations of viable MS2, B bronchiseptica, and canine distemper virus (arithmetic mean ± SD log10 microorganism reduction, 2.57 ± 0.47, ≥ 3.45 ± 0.24, and ≥ 1.50 ± 0.25, respectively) collected from air. Feline herpesvirus-1 was detected in only 1 sample without and no samples with UVGI treatment. Feline calicivirus and canine parvovirus were not detectable in any collected samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results for some surrogates of veterinary pathogens suggested a potential benefit to supplementing manual disinfection practices with UVGI-based air cleaning systems in animal care environments. Further research is needed to investigate the utility of UVGI in operating HVAC systems.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Ultraviolet Rays , Animals , Cats , Disinfection , Ventilation
3.
Trop Med Int Health ; 24(7): 899-921, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop an exposure and risk assessment model to estimate listeriosis infection risks for Peruvian women. METHODS: A simulation model was developed utilising Listeria monocytogenes concentrations on kitchen and latrine surfaces in Peruvian homes, hand trace data from Peruvian women and behavioural data from literature. Scenarios involving varying proportions of uncontaminated, or 'clean', surfaces and non-porous surfaces were simulated. Infection risks were estimated for 4, 6 and 8 h of behaviours and interactions with surfaces. RESULTS: Although infection risks were estimated across scenarios for various time points (e.g. 4, 6, 8 h), overall mean estimated infection risks for all scenarios were ≥ 0.31. Infection risks increased as the proportions of clean surfaces decreased. Hand-to-general surface contacts accounted for the most cumulative change in L. monocytogenes concentration on hands. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to gaining insights on how human behaviours affect exposure and infection risk, this model addressed uncertainties regarding the influence of household surface contamination levels. Understanding the influence of surface contamination in preventing pathogen transmission in households could help to develop intervention strategies to reduce L. monocytogenes infection and associated health risks.


OBJECTIFS: Développer un modèle d'exposition et d'évaluation des risques pour estimer les risques d'infection par la listériose chez les femmes péruviennes. MÉTHODES: Un modèle de simulation a été développé en utilisant des concentrations de Listeria monocytogenes sur la surface des cuisines et des latrines dans des foyers péruviens, des données de traces de mains de femmes péruviennes et des données comportementales de la littérature. Des scénarios impliquant différentes proportions de surfaces non contaminées ou «propres¼ et de surfaces non poreuses ont été simulés. Les risques d'infection ont été estimés pour 4, 6 et 8 heures de comportements et d'interactions avec les surfaces. RÉSULTATS: Bien que les risques d'infection aient été estimés pour tous les scénarios à différents moments (par ex. à 4, 6 ou 8 heures), les risques d'infection globaux moyens estimés pour tous les scénarios étaient ≥ 0,31. Les risques d'infection augmentaient à mesure que les proportions de surfaces propres diminuaient. Les contacts entre la main et les surfaces générales contribuent pour le plus de changement cumulatif de la concentration de L. monocytogenes sur les mains. CONCLUSIONS: En plus de comprendre comment les comportements humains affectent l'exposition et le risque d'infection, ce modèle a traité des incertitudes quant à l'influence des niveaux de contamination des surfaces ménagers. Comprendre l'influence de la contamination de surface dans la prévention de la transmission d'agents pathogènes dans les ménages pourrait aider à développer des stratégies d'intervention pour réduire l'infection à L. monocytogenes et les risques associés pour la santé.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Colony Count, Microbial/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Peru/epidemiology , Risk Assessment
4.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 84(20)2018 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30120116

ABSTRACT

Data below detection limits, left-censored data, are common in environmental microbiology, and decisions in handling censored data may have implications for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this paper, we utilize simulated data sets informed by real-world enterovirus water data to evaluate methods for handling left-censored data. Data sets were simulated with four censoring degrees (low [10%], medium [35%], high [65%], and severe [90%]) and one real-life censoring example (97%) and were informed by enterovirus data assuming a lognormal distribution with a limit of detection (LOD) of 2.3 genome copies/liter. For each data set, five methods for handling left-censored data were applied: (i) substitution with LOD/[Formula: see text], (ii) lognormal maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate mean and standard deviation, (iii) Kaplan-Meier estimation (KM), (iv) imputation method using MLE to estimate distribution parameters (MI method 1), and (v) imputation from a uniform distribution (MI method 2). Each data set mean was used to estimate enterovirus dose and infection risk. Root mean square error (RMSE) and bias were used to compare estimated and known doses and infection risks. MI method 1 resulted in the lowest dose and infection risk RMSE and bias ranges for most censoring degrees, predicting infection risks at most 1.17 × 10-2 from known values under 97% censoring. MI method 2 was the next overall best method. For medium to severe censoring, MI method 1 may result in the least error. If unsure of the distribution, MI method 2 may be a preferred method to avoid distribution misspecification.IMPORTANCE This study evaluates methods for handling data with low (10%) to severe (90%) left-censoring within an environmental microbiology context and demonstrates that some of these methods may be appropriate when using data containing concentrations below a limit of detection to estimate infection risks. Additionally, this study uses a skewed data set, which is an issue typically faced by environmental microbiologists.


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Environmental Microbiology , Limit of Detection , Risk Assessment/methods , Computer Simulation , Drinking Water/virology , Enterovirus/genetics , Enterovirus/isolation & purification , Genome, Viral , Humans , Models, Statistical , Water Microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...