An evaluation of levalbuterol HFA in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) affects up to 90% of all patients with asthma. Objective. This study evaluated the ability of levalbuterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 90 mug (two actuations of 45 microg) administered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) to protect against EIB in mild-to-moderate asthmatics. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way cross-over study. Patients with asthma (n = 15) were > or =18 years, had a > or =6-month history of EIB, > or = 70% baseline predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and a 20% to 50% decrease in FEV(1) after treadmill exercise challenge using single-blind placebo MDI. Levalbuterol or placebo was self-administered 30 minutes before exercise. Treatment sequences were separated by a 3-to 7-day washout period. Spirometry was performed predose, 20 minutes postdose/pre-exercise, and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise. The primary endpoint was the maximum percent decrease in FEV1 from baseline (postdose/pre-exercise). The percentage of protected (< or = 20% decrease in post-exercise FEV1) patients was also assessed. RESULTS: Levalbuterol had significantly smaller maximum percent post-exercise decrease in FEV1 compared with placebo (LS mean +/- SE; -4.8% +/- 2.8% versus -22.5% +/- 2.8%, respectively). For levalbuterol, 14/15 (93.3%) patients had < 20% decrease in post-exercise FEV1 compared with 8/15 (53.3%) for placebo (p = 0.0143). Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Levalbuterol HFA MDI (90 microg) administered 30 minutes before exercise was significantly more effective than placebo in protecting against EIB after a single exercise challenge and was well tolerated. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Levalbuterol HFA MDI when administered before exercise was effective in protecting adults with asthma from EIB.

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.

Effectiveness and tolerability of zafirlukast for the treatment of asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the dose-response relationship of zafirlukast (5 to 40 mg BID) and to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the 10-mg BID dose in school-aged children with mild to moderate asthma. BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of zafirlukast, an oral leukotriene-receptor antagonist, has been demonstrated in adolescents and adults aged > or = 12 years. METHODS: Data from 2 placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trials (trial 1, 4-week double-blind; trial 2, 6-week double-blind) were integrated. Children aged 5 to 11 years were randomly assigned to receive zafirlukast 5 mg BID (n = 99), 10 mg BID (n = 205), 20 mg BID (n = 105), 40 mg BID (n = 99), or placebo (n = 206). The primary outcome was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) expressed as percent of predicted normal. Secondary outcomes were FEV1 (L), morning and evening peak expiratory flow, peak flow variability, short-acting beta2-agonist use, asthma episode score, and nights awakened by asthma. RESULTS: Mean baseline FEV1 was 76.5% of predicted. The greatest improvements were generally seen with zafirlukast 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID, with no additional clinically significant benefits seen at higher doses. The pooled data analysis showed that 10 mg BID compared with placebo significantly improved (P < 0.045) all efficacy outcomes except asthma-episode score and nights awakened with asthma. However, in the subset of children who had > or = 1 night awakened per week at baseline (zafirlukast 10 mg BID = 78; placebo = 86), 10 mg BID significantly reduced nights awakened (P = 0.009) (mean difference from placebo at end point = -0.81 night/wk). All zafirlukast doses were well tolerated and had tolerability profiles that were clinically indistinguishable from placebo. CONCLUSION: These results support the effectiveness and tolerability of the 10-mg BID dose of zafirlukast for the prophylaxis and chronic treatment of mild to moderate asthma in children.

Absence of growth retardation in children with perennial allergic rhinitis after one year of treatment with mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray.

OBJECTIVE: Intranasal corticosteroids are used widely for the treatment of allergic rhinitis because they are effective and well tolerated. However, their potential to suppress growth of pediatric subjects with allergic rhinitis continues to be a concern, particularly in light of reports of growth suppression after treatment with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate or intranasal budesonide (see the article by Skoner et al in this month's issue). A 1-year study of prepubertal patients between 3 and 9 years of age with perennial allergic rhinitis was conducted to assess the effects on growth of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (MFNS), a new once-daily (QD) intranasal corticosteroid with negligible bioavailability. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study. Ninety-eight subjects were randomized to treatment with either MFNS 100 microg QD or placebo for 1 year. Each subject's height was required to be between the 5th and 95th percentile at baseline, and skeletal age at screening was required to be within 2 years of chronological age, as determined by left wrist x-rays. Washout periods for medications that affect either childhood growth or allergic rhinitis symptoms were established based on estimated period of effect, and these medications were prohibited during the study. However, short courses of either oral prednisone lasting no longer than 7 days or low-potency topical dermatologic corticosteroids lasting no longer than 10 days were permitted if necessary. Height was measured with a calibrated stadiometer at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, 39, and 52 weeks, and the primary safety variable was the change in standing height. The rate of growth was also calculated for each subject as the slope (linear regression) of the change in height from baseline using data from all visits of subjects who had at least 2 visits. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical- (HPA)-axis function was assessed via cosyntropin stimulation testing at baseline and at 26 and 52 weeks. All analyses were based on all randomized subjects (intent-to-treat principle). The change from baseline in standing height was analyzed by a 2-way analysis of variance that extracted sources of variation attributable to treatment, center, and treatment-by-center interaction. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar at baseline. Eighty-two subjects completed the study (42 in the MFNS group and 40 in the placebo group), and 93% of subjects achieved at least 80% compliance with therapy. After 1 year of treatment, no suppression of growth was seen in subjects treated with MFNS, and mean standing heights were similar for both treatment groups at all time points. For the primary safety variable (change in height from baseline), both treatment groups were similar at all time points except for weeks 8 and 52. Subjects treated with MFNS had a slightly greater mean increase in height than subjects treated with placebo at these time points: the change in height was 6.95 cm versus 6.35 cm at the 1-year time point. However, the rate of growth (.018 cm/day) averaged for all time points over the course of the study was similar for both treatment groups. Additional analyses found that MFNS did not retard growth in any sex or age subgroup of subjects. The use of exogenous corticosteroids other than the study drug was also similar among the 2 treatment groups. Results from cosyntropin stimulation testing confirmed the absence of systemic effects of MFNS. The change from baseline in the difference between prestimulation and poststimulation levels was similar for both treatment groups after 1 year of treatment, with no evidence of HPA-axis suppression in MFNS-treated subjects at any time point. Incidences of treatment-related adverse events were similar for both treatment groups, with 16% of MFNS-treated subjects reporting adverse events, compared with 22% of placebo-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, an oral, once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of therapy with salmeterol aerosol or montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma. DESIGN: 8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: 17 asthma treatment centers in the United States. PATIENTS: 191 adults with asthma who had documented exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. INTERVENTION: Qualified patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with montelukast (10 mg once in the evening) or salmeterol (50 microg [2 puffs] twice daily). MEASUREMENTS: Changes in pre-exercise and postexercise challenge values; percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1; the area above the FEV1-time curve; and time to recovery of FEV1 at days 1 to 3, week 4, and week 8 of treatment. RESULTS: By day 3, similar and statistically significant reductions in maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 were seen with both therapies. Sustained improvement occurred in the montelukast group at weeks 4 and 8; at these time points, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased significantly. At week 8, the percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 57.2% in the montelukast group and 33.0% in the salmeterol group (P = 0.002). By week 8, 67% of patients receiving montelukast and 46% of patients receiving salmeterol had a maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of less than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The bronchoprotective effect of montelukast was maintained throughout 8 weeks of study. In contrast, significant loss of bronchoprotection at weeks 4 and 8 was seen with salmeterol. Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance.

A 1-year study of salmeterol powder on pulmonary function and hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting beta(2)-sympathomimetic agonists such as salmeterol have been proved safe and effective for the treatment of asthma. However, controversy still exists as to the appropriateness of scheduled long-term therapy with these agents. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the degree of bronchodilation provided by treatment with salmeterol for a period of 52 weeks and evaluated bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine during and after the treatment period. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-two patients with mild to moderate asthma were assessed by 12-hour serial spirometry and serial methacholine challenge tests. RESULTS: The mean area under the FEV(1) curve above baseline over 12 hours after drug at day 1 was significantly greater with salmeterol powder compared with placebo (5.06 liter hours vs 0.77 L/h) and did not change significantly over 1 year. The mean increase in the log(2) of the provocative cumulative methacholine dose producing a 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD(20)FEV(1)) during treatment was significantly higher in the salmeterol-treated patients than in the placebo group (1.02 doubling doses vs 0.43 doubling doses at week 4, 1.06 doubling doses vs 0.41 doubling doses at week 24). At week 52 the increase from baseline in log(2)PD(20)FEV(1) was not significantly different between salmeterol and placebo (1.08 vs 0.69 doubling doses). Seven days after treatment the log(2)PD(20)FEV(1) was -0.60 doubling doses lower than baseline for salmeterol compared with 0.10 doubling doses for placebo (P =.031). Long-term salmeterol use was not associated with a deleterious effect on asthma control during and after treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the bronchodilator properties of salmeterol are sustained over 52 weeks and that bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine is decreased to a modest degree during treatment. Clinically significant increases in hyperresponsiveness did not develop after discontinuation of salmeterol treatment.

Pathophysiology of the inflammatory response.

Airway allergic reactions enlist diverse cells and a multitude of chemical mediators that are responsible for the clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Experiments in vitro and in animal models, as well as increasingly numerous studies in atopic human subjects, are revealing that an orchestrated continuum of cellular activities leading to airway allergic inflammation is set in motion in genetically predisposed individuals at the first exposure to a novel antigen. This sensitization step likely depends on differentiation of and cytokine release by T(H)2 lymphocytes. Among T(H)2-derived cytokines, IL-4 potently enhances B-lymphocyte generation of immunoglobulin E antibodies. The attachment of these antibodies to specific receptors on airway mast cells sets the stage for an acute inflammatory response on subsequent antigen exposure because IgE cross-linking by a bound antigen activates mast cells to release numerous inflammatory mediators. These mast cell-derived mediators collectively produce acute-phase clinical symptoms by enhancing vascular leak, bronchospasm, and activation of nociceptive neurons linked to parasympathetic reflexes. Simultaneously, some mast cell mediators up-regulate expression on endothelial cells of adhesion molecules for leukocytes (eosinophils, but also basophils and lymphocytes), which are key elements in the late-phase allergic response. Chemoattractant molecules released during the acute phase draw these leukocytes to airways during a relatively symptom-free recruitment phase, where they later release a plethora of cytokines and tissue-damaging proteases that herald a second wave of airway inflammatory trauma (late-phase response). The repetition of these processes, with the possible establishment in airway mucosa of memory T lymphocytes and eosinophils that are maintained by paracrine and autocrine cytokine stimulation, may account for airway hypersensitivity and chronic airway symptoms.

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in pediatric asthma patients: A comparison of two salmeterol powder delivery devices.

BACKGROUND: A powder formulation of salmeterol has been shown to prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) in asthmatic children and adults; however, the delivery device (Diskhaler; Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) must be reloaded after 4 doses. A new multidose powder inhaler (Diskus) provides 60 doses of salmeterol in a blister pack presentation with a dose counter. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 50-microg salmeterol powder via two different delivery systems (Diskhaler and Diskus) in preventing EIB in asthmatic children. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study was conducted in 24 children 4 to 11 years of age demonstrating EIB and mild to moderate asthma. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was measured before and after treadmill exercise challenges conducted at 1, 6, and 12 hours after study drug administration. Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: During all exercise challenges, EIB-mediated reductions in FEV(1) were minimized or prevented in patients receiving single doses of salmeterol powder compared with placebo. Single doses of salmeterol powder delivered via either system were equally effective in preventing EIB. There were no drug-related adverse events, cardiovascular, or other clinically relevant safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of salmeterol powder delivered by either delivery system are safe and effective in preventing EIB for >/=12 hours in asthmatic children.

Time to onset of effect of fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of inhaled glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma is well documented; however, times to onset and maximal treatment effects of these agents have been poorly described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the time to onset of effect and the time to the best observed effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: Data from 8 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of at least 8 weeks' duration were analyzed. Corticosteroid-naive patients (n = 1461) were treated with either FP (25 micrograms to 500 micrograms) or placebo twice daily. Efficacy evaluations included morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, supplemental albuterol use, and FEV1. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in PEF, asthma symptom scores, and supplemental albuterol use were observed beginning on day 1 of treatment in the FP group versus the placebo group (P <.001); significant increases in FEV1 were observed at the first measurement at week 1 (P <.001). The best observed effect occurred within 3 weeks of the start of FP treatment for PEF (+36 L/min) and FEV1 (+0.52 L) and within 2 weeks for reduction in supplemental albuterol use and asthma symptom scores. Patients with the most severe airflow obstruction had the greatest change in PEF (+56 L/min) and fastest time to 50% of best observed effect (3 days) compared with patients with mild or moderate airflow obstruction; however, time to best observed effect was similar in the 3 groups (20 to 27 days). CONCLUSION: In patients with asthma, the onset of significant benefit of FP on PEF, symptoms, and rescue albuterol use occurred within 1 day of the start of therapy. FEV1 improved within 1 week of the start of therapy (the first measurement after randomization). There was no effect of sex, age, or dose of FP on the time to response. The best observed response in PEF varies with the degree of baseline airflow obstruction; however, the degree of airflow obstruction has no effect on the time to best observed response.

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

BACKGROUND: The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION: Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in pediatric asthma patients: a comparison of salmeterol powder with albuterol.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a common problem in children with asthma. Pretreatment with the beta2 (beta 2)-adrenoreceptor agonist albuterol is effective for preventing EIB, but is recognized as providing only short-term (2 to 3 hour) protection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 12-hour efficacy and safety of single doses of 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of salmeterol powder administered via Diskus inhaler versus albuterol aerosol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and placebo in preventing EIB in asthmatic children. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, single-dose, four-way crossover study was conducted in pediatric patients (4 to 11 years of age) demonstrating EIB and mild-to-moderate asthma. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured before and after standard treadmill exercise at hour 1, hour 6, and hour 12 after administration of 25 micrograms or 50 micrograms salmeterol powder, 180 micrograms albuterol aerosol, or placebo. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After completion of the hour 1 exercise challenge, mean minimum % predicted FEV1 was significantly higher following albuterol (91.3%) than for placebo (75.3%) and for both dosages of salmeterol (86.9% and 85.8% for salmeterol 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms, respectively; P < or = .026). After completion of both the hour 6 and hour 12 exercise challenges, the 50-microgram salmeterol treatment produced a significantly higher mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 (90.6% and 87.3% predicted, respectively) than the mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 for placebo or albuterol (73.8% to 78.4% of predicted; P < or = .041). At hour 6, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment was not significantly different from albuterol or placebo. At hour 12, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment mean minimum percent of predicted was significantly higher than albuterol (87.9% versus 73.8% of predicted; P = .006) and there was also a trend toward significance over placebo (76.9% predicted; P = .056). At all exercise periods, no statistically significant differences in spirometry values were observed between the two salmeterol treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar among treatments, including placebo. No drug-related adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events occurred. Changes in laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and physical examinations were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: A single 50-microgram dose of salmeterol powder provided effective and safe protection against EIB for at least 12 hours in asthmatic children and provided a significantly more prolonged effect than albuterol aerosol (180 micrograms).

The leukotriene D4-receptor antagonist zafirlukast attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of zafirlukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children. STUDY DESIGN: Exercise challenges were done 4 hours after single oral doses of zafirlukast or placebo were administered in asthmatic children (6 to 14 years) treated with beta 2-agonists alone. Subjects randomized to treatment had a >/=20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) after a screening challenge. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way, crossover design, group 1 (n = 20) received placebo and 5 and 20 mg zafirlukast, and group 2 (n = 19) received placebo and 10 and 40 mg zafirlukast. Maximal percentage fall in FEV1, area under the curve, and time to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of baseline after the challenge were compared with analysis of variance. RESULTS: Mean values for maximal fall in FEV1 ranged from -8.7% +/- 1.7% to -11.1% +/- 1.9% after zafirlukast compared with -17.1% +/- 1.8% and -16.3% +/- 1.9% after placebo. Differences from placebo for fall in FEV1 and area under the curve were significant (P

Algorithm for the diagnosis and management of asthma: a practice parameter update: Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

This algorithm on the diagnosis and treatment of asthma is intended to complement and update the previously published Practice Parameters for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma. Both documents were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the AAAAI, ACAAI, and the JCAAI. The authors of this asthma algorithm have attempted to include all the elements essential for the diagnosis and care of patients with asthma. Every effort was made to keep the algorithm clear and concise, yet thorough and complete (Fig 1). Each component of the algorithm is elaborated further in a brief annotation. For further discussion, the reader is referred to the more extensive Practice Parameters for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma.

Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate powder in children with chronic persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder have not previously been evaluated in children with asthma in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder versus placebo were compared in children between the ages of 4 and 11 years with chronic persistent asthma. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial was performed at 11 clinical centers. Two hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 microg salmeterol powder or placebo (and albuterol as needed) twice daily via a breath-actuated device for 12 weeks. Twelve-hour serial pulmonary function assessments were conducted on day 1 and at week 12. Daily recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptoms, and nocturnal awakenings were assessed. RESULTS: On day 1 and at week 12, weighted mean percent of predicted PEF (P < .001, day 1 and P=.008, week 12) and weighted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (P < .001, day 1 and week 12) were significantly higher at all timepoints evaluated over the 12-hour postdosing period in patients treated with salmeterol powder compared with placebo. Overall reductions in supplemental albuterol use and mean asthma symptom scores were also significantly greater in children administered salmeterol compared with placebo (P=.004 and P=.006, respectively). The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol powder (50 microg twice daily) is effective and safe in producing bronchodilation and relieving symptoms in children with chronic persistent asthma during 12 weeks of treatment.

Dose ranging study of mometasone furoate (Nasonex) in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Topical nasal corticosteroids are rapidly gaining acceptance as first-line therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis, but there is a desire for effective corticosteroids with an improved safety profile over existing products. OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, double-blind dose ranging study was conducted to compare the activity and tolerance of four doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray (tradename Nasonex) and placebo in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Four hundred eighty patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled and randomized to receive mometasone furoate nasal spray 50 micrograms (n = 96), 100 micrograms (n = 95), 200 micrograms (n = 98) or 800 micrograms (n = 95), or placebo vehicle (n = 95) once daily for 28 days. RESULTS: All of the doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray showed activity in reducing the severity of rhinitis. The 200-microgram dose reduced total nasal symptom scores and total symptom scores throughout the study (P < .05 versus placebo vehicle). The 50-microgram dose and the 100-microgram dose showed less consistent activity at early timepoints (days 3 and 7), while the 800 microgram dose did not provide significant additional benefits over the 200-microgram dose. All dose levels were well tolerated CONCLUSION: The results of this trial indicate that 200 micrograms once daily is the optimum dose of mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid with negligible systemic bioavailability via the oral route, is efficacious in the treatment of asthma when administered via metered-dose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate powder in patients with moderate asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 342 adolescent and adult patients with moderate asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 50% and 80% of predicted] treated previously by beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide. Patients received fluticasone propionate powder 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, 250 micrograms, or placebo via a breath-actuated inhalation device, the Diskhaler, twice daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Patients in the fluticasone propionate groups experienced a mean increase from baseline to endpoint in FEV1 ranging from 0.43 L to 0.47 L. Patients in the placebo group experienced a mean decrease from baseline of 0.22 L (P < .001). The probability of patients remaining in the study over time without developing signs of exacerbating asthma was significantly greater in the fluticasone propionate groups than in the placebo group (P = .001). Asthma symptom scores, supplemental rescue albuterol use, and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma requiring treatment also improved significantly with all fluticasone propionate treatment regimens compared with placebo (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences at endpoint among the three fluticasone propionate groups. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate powder (50, 100, and 250 micrograms) was well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function in patients with moderate asthma.

Once-daily cetirizine effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in children aged 6 to 11 years: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Cetirizine (once daily), a highly selective H1-antagonist, is efficacious for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis, and chronic idiopathic urticaria. A 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the safety and efficacy of cetirizine syrup (5 or 10 mg daily) in 209 children ages 6 to 11 years with SAR. Parents assisted patients in recording symptom severity (sneezing, nasal discharge, itchy eyes, itchy nose or mouth, conjunctivitis, nasal congestion) daily. A total symptom severity (TSS) score was derived from all symptoms, excluding nasal congestion. At baseline, TSS was comparable for all groups (range 6.8-7.0). Cetirizine 10 mg produced a significantly greater mean TSS reduction (3.2) than placebo (P < 0.05) over the treatment period. Cetirizine 5 mg once daily produced mean reductions in weekly symptom scores of 2.4; this did not differ statistically from placebo. Furthermore, cetirizine 10 mg significantly improved symptoms of itchy eyes, nose, or mouth. The most commonly reported adverse reactions to both cetirizine and placebo were headache, pharyngitis, and abdominal pain, which did not occur with an incidence statistically different from that of placebo. Once-daily cetirizine is safe for treating SAR in children ages 6-11 years. Once-daily cetirizine 10 mg provides effective improvement in symptoms and is well tolerated.

Extended-release albuterol in the treatment of 6- to 12-year-old asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: Albuterol sulfate, in the syrup and tablet form for oral administration, has been an effective treatment for adults and children with bronchial asthma. Extended-release albuterol sulfate tablets (Proventil Repetabs, Schering Corp.) provide a convenient, twice-daily dosing regimen, but are indicated only for patients > or = 12 years of age. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether patients 6 to 12 years of age could be effectively and safely treated with extended-release albuterol tablets. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of 157 patients in five centers. Patients were randomized to 4 weeks' treatment with extended-release albuterol tablets, 4 mg twice daily (q 12h), increasing up to 12 mg q 12h, or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs), physician and patient evaluations, and data collected from patients' diaries on PEFR, asthma symptoms, number of nighttime awakenings, and number of tablets taken. The primary efficacy parameter was area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1, evaluated for 8 to 12 hours post-dosing. Safety was evaluated based on vital signs, electrocardiograms, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean AUCs for FEV1 were significantly greater in the albuterol group at days 1 and 8 (P < or = .03). The albuterol group showed consistently lower severity scores for asthma symptoms. Physicians' and patients' global evaluations favored the albuterol group over the placebo group. No serious, treatment-related adverse events were reported. There were no clinically meaningful changes from baseline in either treatment group for vital signs or electrocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release albuterol tablets (4 mg), administered to children 6 to 12 years old in divided doses of up to 24 mg/day, improved pulmonary function and asthmatic symptoms and were well tolerated.