Evaluation of a novel device to assess obstructive sleep apnea and body position.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea is a prevalent disease with well-known complications when left untreated. Advances in sleep-disordered breathing diagnosis may increase detection and appropriate treatment. The Wesper device is a recently developed portable system with specialized wearable patches that can measure respiratory effort, derived airflow, estimated air pressure, and body position. This study sought to compare the diagnostic ability of the novel Wesper device with the gold standard of polysomnography. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study underwent simultaneous polysomnography and Wesper device testing in a sleep laboratory setting. Data were collected and scored by readers blinded to all patient information, and the primary reader was blinded to testing method. The accuracy of the Wesper device was determined by calculation of the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman limits of agreement of apnea-hypopnea indices between testing methods. Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study and 45 patients were included in the final analysis. Pearson correlation between polysomnography and Wesper device apnea-hypopnea index determinations was 0.951, which met the primary endpoint goal (P = .0003). The Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were -8.05 and 6.38, which also met the endpoint goal (P < .001). There were no adverse events or serious adverse events noted. CONCLUSIONS: The Wesper device compares favorably with gold-standard polysomnography. Given the lack of safety concerns, we advocate for further study regarding its utility in diagnosis and management of sleep apnea in the future. CITATION: Raphelson JR, Ahmed IM, Ancoli-Israel S, et al. Evaluation of a novel device to assess obstructive sleep apnea and body position. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(9):1643-1649.

Long-acting reversible contraceptives: New evidence to support clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: General practice plays a key role in providing access to contraceptive options to reduce unintended pregnancies. The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) is increasing in Australia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to provide an update on new evidence and guidance relating to clinical practice for LARCs. DISCUSSION: A new Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme-listed hormonal intrauterine device (IUD), as well as updated guidelines for LARC provision and use, are reviewed. The 19.5 mg levonorgestrel IUD provides a smaller, lower-dose hormonal IUD. This article compares IUDs now available in Australia to support informed patient choice. Updated guidance for IUD users in perimenopause, as well as those using menstrual cups, is outlined. The contraceptive hormonal implant has updated product information, which includes new insertion site and arm positioning for procedures.

Implanon NXT: Expert tips for best-practice insertion and removal.

BACKGROUND: The single rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant is available in Australia as Implanon NXT. It is a highly effective, long-acting reversible contraceptive method, which is suitable for most women across the reproductive lifespan. OBJECTIVE: This article provides practical advice for clinicians who already insert and remove the contraceptive implant, as well as advice for those who have not yet acquired this procedural skill. DISCUSSION: Contraceptive implant procedures are usually performed in the general practice setting. Clinicians can support women in making an informed choice to have an implant by providing information about their benefits, side effects and risks, and timely access to insertion. Training in the procedures and compliance with procedural instructions are essential to minimise risks, including deep insertion and damage to neurovascular structures.

Interpreting the Australian dietary guideline to "limit" into practical and personalised advice.

Food-based dietary guidelines shift the focus from single nutrients to whole diet. Guideline 3 of the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) recommends "limiting" discretionary foods and beverages (DF)-Those high in saturated fat, added sugars, salt, and/or alcohol. In Australia, DF contribute 35% of total energy intake. Using the ADG supporting documents, the aim of this study was to develop a food­based educational toolkit to help translate guideline 3 and interpret portion size. The methodology used to produce the toolkit is presented here. "Additional energy allowance" is specific to gender, age, height and physical activity level, and can be met from core foods, unsaturated fats/oils/spreads and/or DF. To develop the toolkit, additional energy allowance was converted to serves equaling 600 kJ. Common DF were selected and serves were determined based on nutrient profile. Portion sizes were used to calculate number of DF serves. A consumer brochure consisting of DF, portion sizes and equivalent number of DF serves was developed. A healthcare professional guide outlines the methodology used. The toolkit was designed to assist dietitians and consumers to translate guideline 3 of the ADF and develop a personalized approach to include DF as part of the diet.

An intragastric balloon in the treatment of obese individuals with metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: There are limited controlled data for intragastric balloons (IGB) in obesity treatment. This randomized, controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an IGB in obese individuals with metabolic syndrome (MS). DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-six adults (BMI: 30-40 kg/m(2)) were randomized to IGB for 6 months, with a 12 month behavioral modification (IGB Group; "IGBG"), or 12 month behavioral modification alone (Control Group; "CG"). The primary outcome was percentage change in body weight. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects (female: 68%; mean age: 43; mean BMI: 36.0) were randomized to IGBG and 35 (66%; 48; 36.7) to CG. At 6 months, there was a significantly greater weight loss in the IGBG: -14.2 vs. -4.8; P < 0.0001. This was associated with a significantly greater reduction in waist circumference, and an improvement in quality of life, with a trend for a larger %MS remission (50% vs. 30%; n.s.). At month 12, the differences in weight loss were enduring: -9.2 vs. -5.2; P = 0.007. Gastrointestinal-related adverse events were common in the IGBG, resolving predominantly within two weeks. The IGB was removed prematurely in three subjects (one for refractory gastrointestinal symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in weight loss and health outcomes were observed with the IGBG at 6 months versus behavioral modification alone. The differential weight loss was still evident 6 months after IGB removal.

Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity needs effective approaches for weight loss in primary care and community settings. We compared weight loss with standard treatment in primary care with that achieved after referral by the primary care team to a commercial provider in the community. METHODS: In this parallel group, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial, 772 overweight and obese adults were recruited by primary care practices in Australia, Germany, and the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with a computer-generated simple randomisation sequence to receive either 12 months of standard care as defined by national treatment guidelines, or 12 months of free membership to a commercial programme (Weight Watchers), and followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome was weight change over 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat (last observation carried forward [LOCF] and baseline observation carried forward [BOCF]) and in the population who completed the 12-month assessment. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN85485463. FINDINGS: 377 participants were assigned to the commercial programme, of whom 230 (61%) completed the 12-month assessment; and 395 were assigned to standard care, of whom 214 (54%) completed the 12-month assessment. In all analyses, participants in the commercial programme group lost twice as much weight as did those in the standard care group. Mean weight change at 12 months was -5·06 kg (SE 0·31) for those in the commercial programme versus -2·25 kg (0·21) for those receiving standard care (adjusted difference -2·77 kg, 95% CI -3·50 to -2·03) with LOCF; -4·06 kg (0·31) versus -1·77 kg (0·19; adjusted difference -2·29 kg, -2·99 to -1·58) with BOCF; and -6·65 kg (0·43) versus -3·26 kg (0·33; adjusted difference -3·16 kg, -4·23 to -2·11) for those who completed the 12-month assessment. Participants reported no adverse events related to trial participation. INTERPRETATION: Referral by a primary health-care professional to a commercial weight loss programme that provides regular weighing, advice about diet and physical activity, motivation, and group support can offer a clinically useful early intervention for weight management in overweight and obese people that can be delivered at large scale. FUNDING: Weight Watchers International, through a grant to the UK Medical Research Council.

Individualising weight loss prescription--a management tool for clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global epidemic and a growing cause of comorbidities seen by clinicians. Yet apart from recent guidelines developed by the National Health and Medical Research Council there are few clinical tools available to tackle this problem. OBJECTIVE: This article describes a tool for detecting aspects of both diet and lifestyle likely to adversely affect the body weight of an individual. DISCUSSION: The Diet, Activity and Behaviour Questionnaire (DAB-Q) is designed to identify the nutrition, physical activity and eating behaviours likely to lead to energy imbalance and increased body weight in an individual. This tool can be used in clinical practice to help individualise appropriate behavioural prescriptions for successful weight management.