Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Minerva Pediatr (Torino) ; 74(2): 195-201, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35511631

ABSTRACT

In infants and children, fever is very common in the emergency setting. The overall aim of the present publication was to overview guidance and provide an algorithm for use in the emergency setting as well as recommendations to inform parents for home care. To obtain consensus, a core steering committee drafted a management algorithm and general consensus was obtained by remote voting among experts. A number of common messages are found in current guidelines: management of fever depends on age, antipyretics are indicated only for discomfort; paracetamol or ibuprofen can be recommended; physical methods for lowering temperature are discouraged. A consensus algorithm is presented in which infants <28 days are considered separately, while those >28 days and <90 days are divided into those ill or well appearing. All infants <28 days with fever ≥37.5 °C should undergo complete work-up for sepsis, strongly considered to receive empirical antibiotics ± acyclovir, and be hospitalized. All infants (between 28 and 90 days) ill appearing should undergo diagnostic work-up for sepsis, receive empirical antibiotics, and be hospitalized. In well appearing infants, diagnostic work-up should be carried out to decide admission to hospital and administration of antibiotics. Specific recommendations are also given for home discharge that can be used to inform parents about the actions to take during home care in the attempt to reinforce existing guidelines. At present, physical examination and laboratory tests, along with best clinical judgement and postdischarge guidance following a defined algorithm, are the foundation of management of febrile children.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Sepsis , Aftercare , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/drug therapy , Humans , Infant
2.
Blood Transfus ; 18(2): 143-151, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657709

ABSTRACT

Emicizumab has been approved in several countries for regular prophylaxis in patients with congenital haemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors because it substantially reduces their bleeding risk and improves quality of life. However, although significantly less frequent, some breakthrough bleeds may still occur while on emicizumab, requiring treatment with bypassing or other haemostatic agents. Thrombotic complications have been reported with the associated use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. In addition, when surgery/invasive procedures are needed while on emicizumab, their management requires multidisciplinary competences and direct supervision by experts in the use of this agent. Given this, and in order to expand the current knowledge on the use of emicizumab and concomitant haemostatic agents, and reduce the risk of complications in this setting, the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) here provides guidance on the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery in emergency situations in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. This paper has been shared with other National Scientific Societies involved in the field.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/prevention & control , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Factor VIII/antagonists & inhibitors , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Humans , Italy , Quality of Life
3.
Pediatrics ; 126(6): e1445-52, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21078735

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) relieves symptoms in children with recurrent abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 141 children with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional pain were enrolled in 9 primary care sites and a referral center. Children entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and received LGG or placebo for 8 weeks and entered follow-up for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was overall pain at the end of the intervention period. At entry and at the end of the trial, children underwent a double-sugar intestinal permeability test. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, LGG, but not placebo, caused a significant reduction of both frequency (P < .01) and severity (P < .01) of abdominal pain. These differences still were significant at the end of follow-up (P < .02 and P < .001, respectively). At week 12, treatment success was achieved in 48 children in the LGG group compared with 37 children in the placebo group (P < .03); this difference still was present at the end of follow-up (P < .03). At entry, 59% of the children had abnormal results from the intestinal permeability test; LGG, but not placebo, determined a significant decrease in the number of patients with abnormal results from the intestinal permeability testing (P < .03). These effects mainly were in children with IBS. CONCLUSIONS: LGG significantly reduces the frequency and severity of abdominal pain in children with IBS; this effect is sustained and may be secondary to improvement of the gut barrier.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...