ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the 20th century, major technological developments have been made in blood transfusion. Although numerous sociological studies have been conducted on donors, few have highlighted transfused patients, and in this case, the attention has almost exclusively been focused on transfusion risks in patients. Conversely, blood representations associated with the chronically transfused patients have not really been explored in the literature. Based on interviews conducted among chronically transfused patients (patients with hemoglobinopathy, malignant hemopathy or cancer), this present study enables to understand their needs and their expectations through their symbolic representations and their interpretations of blood transfusion, raising tensions as well ethical perspectives.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/psychology , Blood , Hematologic Diseases/psychology , Neoplasms/psychology , Patients/psychology , Symbolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Health , Blood Transfusion/ethics , Blood Transfusion/history , Chronic Disease , Culture , Ethnicity/psychology , Fear , Female , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Physician-Patient Relations , Religion and Medicine , Terminal Care/psychology , Transfusion Reaction , Truth Disclosure , Young AdultABSTRACT
Varicose vein repair often necessitates a distal approach to the great saphenous vein (GSV). The classic method involves a medial pre-malleolar approach. We propose a more distal approach via the medial surface of the foot where there is a cutaneous landmark, which can be used to locate the GSV in a simple, reliable and reproducible fashion. In 20 cadaveric feet, we dissected out the GSV exploiting the above-mentioned cutaneous landmark. We then extended the dissection up as far as the medial pre-malleolar region (from where the GSV is classically approached) in order to be able to compare the diameter of the vein at the two different points (in the foot and in the pre-malleolar region). We also compared the cutaneous landmark with ultrasonographic location of the GSV in 22 feet of healthy subjects. Both dissections and ultrasound examinations demonstrated the reliability of the cutaneous landmark. Moreover, no significant difference was detected in the diameter of the GSV at the two different approach points. This original distal approach to the GSV requires only minor modifications of current practice for varicose veins surgical treatment.
