Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Res Microbiol ; 156(2): 278-88, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15748995

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei, closely related Gram-negative bacteria, are the causative agents of such serious infectious diseases of humans and animals as glanders and melioidosis, respectively. Despite numerous studies of these pathogens, the detailed mechanisms of their pathogenesis is still poorly understood. One of the serious obstacles to revealing factors responsible for pathogenicity lies in the considerable natural variability of B. pseudomallei and B. mallei, which is also a challenge to development of rapid and efficient diagnostic tools facilitating unambiguous identification of the infectious agents. To gain a deeper insight into B. mallei and B. pseudomallei interspecies divergence and intraspecies polymorphism, we compared the genomes of B. mallei C-5 and B. pseudomallei C-141 strains using a subtractive hybridization technique. A library of DNA fragments specific for B. mallei C-5 and absent from B. pseudomallei C-141 was obtained and analyzed. Some of the differential sequences detected were also not found in the recently sequenced genome of B. pseudomallei K96243. However, a multitude of B. mallei C-5 sequences absent from the B. pseudomallei C-141 genome were detected in the genome of B. pseudomallei K96243. On the other hand, some sequences identified as constituents of the B. mallei C-5 genome were not found in the genome of B. mallei ATCC 23344. Some of the differential DNA fragments displayed similarity to different mobile elements that have not yet been described for B. mallei, whereas the others matched fragments of various prophages, or, when translated into protein sequences, components of active transport systems and different enzymes. A substantial proportion of the differential clones had no database matches either at the nucleotide or amino acid sequence level. The results suggest great genome-wide intra- and interspecies variability of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei. The differences identified may be useful as molecular signatures for identification of B. mallei strains.


Subject(s)
Burkholderia mallei/classification , Burkholderia pseudomallei/classification , Chromosome Mapping/methods , Genetic Markers , Genetic Variation , Genome, Bacterial , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Base Sequence , Burkholderia mallei/genetics , Burkholderia pseudomallei/genetics , Gene Library , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Sequence Analysis, DNA
2.
Res Microbiol ; 155(9): 781-93, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15501656

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei, closely related Gram-negative bacteria, are causative agents of serious infectious diseases of humans and animals: glanders and melioidosis, respectively. Despite numerous studies of these pathogens, the detailed mechanism of their pathogenesis is still unknown. The problem is even more complicated due to natural variability of B. pseudomallei and B. mallei strains, the understanding of which is a prerequisite for rational design of tools for diagnostics, prophylaxis and therapy of the diseases. Using a subtractive hybridization technique, we compared the genomes of B. pseudomallei C-141 and B. mallei C-5 strains. A subtracted library of DNA fragments specific for B. pseudomallei C-141 and absent from B. mallei C-5 was obtained and analyzed. A variety of differences have been detected and mapped on the recently sequenced genome of B. pseudomallei K96243. A comparative sequence analysis also revealed considerable genomic differences between B. pseudomallei C-141 and B. mallei ATCC 23344 strains sequenced at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR). We also observed significant genomic differences between B. pseudomallei C-141 and B. pseudomallei K96243. Some of the differential DNA fragments displayed similarity to different mobile elements which have not yet been described for B. pseudomallei, whereas the others matched various prophage components, components of active transport systems, different enzymes and transcription regulators. A substantial proportion of the differential clones had no database matches either at the nucleotide or protein level. The results provide evidence for great genome-wide variability of B. pseudomallei, further confirmed by Southern blot analysis of various B. pseudomallei strains. The data obtained can be useful for future development of efficient diagnostic tools allowing rapid identification of species, strains and isolates of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei.


Subject(s)
Burkholderia mallei/classification , Burkholderia/classification , Genetic Variation , Genome, Bacterial , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Burkholderia/genetics , Burkholderia mallei/genetics , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleic Acid Hybridization/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...