Plasma and follicular fluid concentrations of LHRH antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) in controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Cetrorelix was administered in differing daily dosages for controlled ovarian stimulation. The dosage levels were 3 mg (9 cycles), 1 mg (19 cycles), 0.5 mg (43 cycles), 0.25 mg (46 cycles) and 0.1 mg (7 cycles). In the 3 mg, 1 mg and 0.5 mg group the respective median plasma concentrations of cetrorelix on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) were 2.10 ng/ml, 1.42 ng/ml and 0.88 ng/ml and 1.03 ng/ml, 0.46 ng/ml and 0.49 ng/ml on the day of embryo transfer (ET). In the 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg groups plasma cetrorelix levels were below the limit of quantification. The cetrorelix concentrations in follicular fluid (FF) in the 0.25 mg group were detectable in only 14 out of 44 samples, while in the 0.1 mg group no detectable concentrations could be obtained. We also examined 80 cycles after single doses of 5 mg (7 cycles), 3 mg (42 cycles), and 2 mg (31 cycles) cetrorelix. On the day of OPU the respective median plasma concentrations of cetrorelix were 0.57 ng/ml, 0.62 ng/ml, and 0.56 ng/ml, and 0.61 ng/ml and 0.28 ng/ml on the day of ET in the 5 mg and 3 mg groups. In the 2 mg group, the plasma concentrations fell to below limits of quantification in 8/9 samples on the day of ET. In 26 out of 27 FF samples cetrorelix was detectable in the 3 mg single dose group (median level: 0.69 ng/ml).

Pharmacodynamic effects and plasma pharmacokinetics of single doses of cetrorelix acetate in healthy premenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacodynamic effects and plasma pharmacokinetics of single subcutaneous doses of cetrorelix acetate in healthy premenopausal women. SETTING: Phase I clinical research unit. PATIENT(S): Healthy, premenopausal women aged 19 to 35 years. INTERVENTION(S): Single subcutaneous morning doses of cetrorelix acetate (1, 3, or 5 mg peptide base) were investigated in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. After a control cycle, 36 women received cetrorelix acetate (12 per dose) and 12 received placebo on the eighth individual cycle day. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed, and blood samples for LH, FSH, E2 were collected during both cycles and for pharmacokinetics up to 168 hours after dosing. The serum hormone levels were determined by electrochemicoluminescence immunoassay and plasma cetrorelix concentrations by radioimmuno assay. RESULTS: Cetrorelix acetate administration led to a rapid, marked, and reversible suppression of serum LH, E2, and to a lesser extent FSH concentrations. The median intra-individual shifts between treatment and control cycle were -1.0, 4.0, 8.0, and 9.5 days for serum LH maximum and -1.0, 4.5, 7.0, and 10.0 days for ovulation following placebo or 1, 3, and 5 mg cetrorelix acetate, peptide base, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak cetrorelix concentrations in plasma (Cmax) increased proportionally with dose. CONCLUSIONS: Cetrorelix acetate showed pronounced and reversible LH and E2 suppression and a dose-dependent postponement of LH surge and ovulation after single subcutaneous administrations to healthy premenopausal women. Dose proportionality over the range of 1 mg to 5 mg cetrorelix acetate, peptide base was demonstrated.

Pituitary and gonadal endocrine effects and pharmacokinetics of the novel luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist teverelix in healthy men--a first-dose-in-humans study.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Teverelix is a novel synthetic peptidic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist. METHODS: Single subcutaneous morning doses of teverelix acetate (either 0.5, 1, 2, 3, or 5 mg base) were investigated in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating parallel-group design in healthy men. Six subjects received teverelix, and two subjects received placebo per dose level. Blood samples for lutropin, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follitropin, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone, as well as for pharmacokinetics, were withdrawn up to 120 hours after dosing. Serum hormone levels were determined by electrochemicoluminescence immunoassays, and plasma teverelix concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Teverelix led to a rapid, marked suppression of LH, testosterone and, to a lesser extent, FSH. Median maximum suppressions compared with predose levels were -93% for LH and -54% for FSH after teverelix 5 mg, and -93% for testosterone after teverelix 3 mg, respectively. After 5 mg teverelix, testosterone suppression <1 ng/mL started a median of 12 hours after dosing and lasted for a median of 33 hours. The duration of testosterone suppression increased with dose. Geometric means of peak teverilix plasma concentrations were 4.5 ng/mL (0.5 mg teverelix) to 49.0 ng/mL (5 mg teverelix) and tmax occurred between 1 and 4 hours after dosing. Geometric means of the area under the teverelix plasma concentration-time course from zero to time of the last quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC(O-tlast)] were 54.9 ng x h/mL (0.5 mg teverelix) to 881.8 ng x h/mL (5 mg teverelix). Median values for apparent terminal half-lives ranged from 24 to 75 hours. The most frequently reported adverse events were short-lasting mild injection-site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Teverelix showed pronounced LH and testosterone suppressive effects after single subcutaneous doses in healthy men. Duration of hormone suppression increased with dose. Teverelix was well tolerated. This profile indicates potential for further clinical use.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of testosterone and luteinizing hormone suppression by cetrorelix in healthy volunteers.

Cetrorelix (CET), a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist, was recently approved for the prevention of premature ovulation in patients undergoing a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), followed by oocyte pickup and assisted reproductive techniques (ART), and is currently under clinical trials for benign prostate hyperplasia, endometriosis, and tumors sensitive to sex hormones. CET suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone (T) in men. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of 3 mg intravenously and subcutaneously administered CET in healthy male and female volunteers and to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to link the plasma concentrations of CET to the T and LH suppression in males. Following intravenous (IV) (n = 5) and subcutaneous (SC) (n = 6) administration of CET acetate, CET and hormone plasma levels were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods, respectively. Pharmacokinetics of CET was explained by a three-compartment model for the IV route and by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption for the SC route. Average absolute bioavailability after SC administration was 85%. There were no differences in the pharmacokinetics between male and female subjects (ANOVA, p > 0.05). Single IV and SC doses of CET caused immediate and distinct suppression of LH, FSH, and T levels by 80%, 45% and 95% of their baseline levels, respectively. The duration of hormone suppression was longer for the SC route. An indirect-response PK-PD Emax model was developed to link the measured CET plasma concentrations with the respective T or LH levels. In addition, the circadian rhythm of T levels was accounted by including a cosine function in a second separate PD model. The PD model with cosine function was applied to T baseline levels as well as to the suppressed concentrations after CET dosing. The two models adequately described the PK-PD relationship between plasma levels of CET and T suppression following IV and SC dosing. The EC50 values (mean +/- SD) for the suppression of T were similar (p > 0.05) between the two routes of administration and the two models.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of cetrorelix, an LH-RH antagonist, after subcutaneous administration in healthy premenopausal women.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was the development of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for the luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression and subsequent shift in LH surge and follicle-stimulating hormone by cetrorelix in women. BACKGROUND: Cetrorelix is a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist and is used for the prevention of the premature ovulation indicated by an LH surge in in vitro fertilization. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for the suppression and the shift in the LH surge has not yet been established. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled study, single subcutaneous doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg of cetrorelix were given to 36 subjects on day 8 of the natural menstrual cycle. Cetrorelix, LH, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone were determined. RESULTS: Cetrorelix pharmacokinetics were described by a 2-compartment model with a terminal half-life of 56.9 +/- 27.1 hours. Mean shift in LH surge was by 4.1, 7.5, and 9.3 days with the 1-, 3-, and 5-mg doses, respectively. An indirect response sigmoid Emax model was developed for the suppression of LH and the shift in the LH surge. The inhibitory concentration of 50% (for LH suppression) and median effective concentration (for surge shift) estimates were 3.6 ng/mL and 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. The suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone was described by a similar Emax model, with an inhibitory concentration of 50% of 7.25 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model was developed for the transient initial suppression of LH and the subsequent shift in the LH surge after 3 single subcutaneous doses of cetrorelix without ovarian stimulation. A separate model was developed for the suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone by cetrorelix. The shift in the LH surge could be adequately described by the model.

Retigabine N-glucuronidation and its potential role in enterohepatic circulation.

The metabolism of retigabine in humans and dogs is dominated by N-glucuronidation (), whereas in rats, a multitude of metabolites of this new anticonvulsant is observed (). The comparison of the in vivo and in vitro kinetics of retigabine N-glucuronidation in these species identified a constant ratio between retigabine and retigabine N-glucuronide in vivo in humans and dog. An enterohepatic circulation of retigabine in these species is likely to be the result of reversible glucuronidation-deglucuronidation reactions. Rats did not show such a phenomenon, indicating that enterohepatic circulation of retigabine via retigabine N-glucuronide does not occur in this species. In the rat, 90% of retigabine N-glucuronidation is catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1 and UGT1A2, whereas family 2 UGT enzymes contribute also. Of ten recombinant human UGTs, only UGTs 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, and 1A9 catalyzed the N-glucuronidation of retigabine. From the known substrate specificities of UGT1A4 toward lamotrigine and bilirubin and our activity and inhibition data, we conclude that UGT1A4 is a major retigabine N-glucuronosyl transferase in vivo and significantly contributes to the enterohepatic cycling of the drug.

Determination of the two diastereoisomers of lobaplatin (D-19466) in plasma ultrafiltrate of cancer patients with a normal or an impaired kidney or liver function by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

Lobaplatin consists of two diastereoisomers, LP-D1 and LP-D2. Being a new cytostatic agent it represents platinum compounds of the third generation and is active in several in vitro tumor models of murine and human origin. To determine the pharmacokinetics of LP-D1 and LP-D2 in cancer patients with and without a normal kidney and liver function, an HPLC procedure was developed and validated. Plasma ultrafiltrate samples were injected into the HPLC system after solid-phase extraction. The standard curves of LP-D1 and LP-D2 in plasma ultrafiltrate were linear over the range 0.071-9.100 and 0.067-8.639 microM, respectively. The recovery from plasma ultrafiltrate was 84% for both diastereoisomers. The within-day accuracy ranged from 98.1 to 100.3% for LP-D1 and from 96.5 to 106% for LP-D2. The between-day accuracy ranged from 99.2 to 101.5% fro LP-D1 and 97.7 to and < or = 6.5% for LP-D2, respectively. For pharmacokinetic purposes the method proved to be sufficiently sensitive, specific and accurate for analysing clinical samples.