Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for merkel cell carcinoma of the skin.

PURPOSE: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare tumor of the skin with aggressive behavior, is usually fatal when advanced disease is present. The role of chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of patients with MCC is unclear. METHODS: Over 15 years, 9 patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease were treated with carboplatin (CBDCA) (300 mg/m(2) of AUC 5 on Day 1) and etoposide (VP-16) (100 mg/m(2) on Days 1-3) every 3 weeks. As second-line CT, cisplatin (CDDP) (60-100 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (IFO) (3-5 g/m(2)) and epirubicin (EPI) (30-50 mg/m(2)) were utilized. RESULTS: Of the 3 patients who received adjuvant therapy, one achieved complete response after 108+ months with second-line chemotherapy and radiotherapy, despite a brief relapse; 2 patients remain disease-free after 84+ and 108+ months. Of the 6 patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who were treated with first-line chemotherapy, one (16.6 percent) achieved a complete response and 3 (50 percent) achieved partial response, for an overall response rate of 66.6 percent. Two patients (one with complete and one with partial response) received subsequent radiotherapy, following which complete response was achieved. Of the 2 complete responders, one patient remains disease-free after 56+ months. The median overall survival from the time of initial diagnosis for the whole group was 56 months (range 15-114 months); the median overall survival from the initiation of chemotherapy was 18 months (range 6-108+). Local recurrences and soft tissue metastases responded better than visceral metastases. Patients with partial response and no response had rapid disease progression and fatality, despite second-line chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: MCC appears to be chemosensitive but can progress rapidly with fatal outcomes. Although the rarity of these tumors precludes randomized trials, a common treatment plan should be utilized by those treating MCC. This may allow some conclusions regarding the optimum treatment of patients with MCC to be drawn in the future.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer.

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

HER-2/neu status of primary breast cancer and corresponding metastatic sites in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether there were changes in HER-2/neu status in newly-developed metastatic lesions following treatment with trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer patients overexpressing HER-2/neu. The utility of serological assays for HER-2/neu in such patients was also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing tumors (15 were 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and one 2+ by IHC and positive by the chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) test) were included in the study. Fourteen patients underwent biopsy and 2 patients fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of newly-developed metastatic lesions following trastuzumab treatment. All samples were assayed for HER-2 by IHC and by the CISH test. Serial serum HER-2/neu (S-HER-2) levels were measured prior to (baseline values) and during trastuzumab-based treatment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (cut-off point: 10 ng/ml) in all patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with "altered HER-2/neu status" and those with "conserved HER-2/neu status" in the metastatic region. RESULTS: Six out of the 16 (37%) ("altered HER-2/neu status") newly-developed metastatic lesions lost their HER-2/neu overexpression and scored 0 or +1 by IHC or negative on the CISH test, while in the remaining cases (10/16, 62.5%) ("conserved HER-2/neu status"), the HER-2/neu status was unchanged (+3 by IHC or a positive CISH test). Baseline S-HER-2 levels were elevated in 5 out of 16 patients (3 of "altered HER-2/neu status", 2 of "conserved HER-2/neu status"). The serum HER-2 (S-HER-2) levels declined and returned within the normal ranges in all these 5 patients as a response to trastuzumab treatment. Following the disease progression, the S-HER-2 levels of the 3 patients with "altered HER-2/neu status" remained normal, while those of 2 with "conserved HER-2/neu status" increased. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of chemotherapeutic treatments or the median time of treatment with trastuzumab or chemotherapy between the 2 groups. Time to tumor progression (TTP) was significantly shorter in the "altered HER-2/neu status" patients (median TTP for "altered HER-2/neu status": 9.5 months, and for "conserved HER-2/neu status": 12 months; p <0.001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, for most patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab, the HER-2/neu expression as measured by IHC and/or CISH in newly-developed metastatic lesions was unchanged. However, a remarkable percentage of cases lost HER-2/neu overexpression. It is not clear whether this finding implies resistance or sensitivity to trastuzumab.

Optimal therapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: doxorubicin, gemcitabine or topotecan?

Ovarian cancer is more fatal than all the other gynaecological malignancies combined. Although most patients respond to first-line combination chemotherapy, the vast majority (50-75%) of patients with advanced disease will relapse. The management of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is based on their response profile to platinum: patients with platinum-sensitive disease can be rechallenged with platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas the management of patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory disease remains an area of active investigation. In this review, the data for second-line therapy in this latter group of patients will be summarised and recommendations for their optimal management will be made.

Merkel cell cancer of the skin.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare malignant cutaneous tumor of the elderly with rapidly growing skin nodules found predominantly on sun-exposed areas of the body. The vast majority of patients present with localized disease, while up to 30% have regional lymph node metastases. Despite local excision and the incidence of local recurrence, regional lymph node metastases and distant metastases is high and usually occurs within 2 years of primary diagnosis. The optimal treatment for patients with MCC remains unclear. The best outcome is achieved with multidisciplinary management including surgical excision of primary tumor with adequate margins and post-operative radiotherapy (RT) to control local and regional disease. Patients with regional nodal metastases should be treated with lymph node dissection plus RT. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered as part of the initial management. In case of metastatic disease CT based on regimens used for small-cell lung cancer is the standard treatment of care.

Comparison of docetaxel and docetaxel-irinotecan combination as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether docetaxel (taxotere) treatment with or without irinotecan improved patient outcomes with similar toxicity in recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent platinum-refractory NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomized to either docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day 1), both administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomized. The response rate (RR) (20% versus 14%), overall survival (6.5 months versus 6.4 months) and 1-year survival (37% versus 34%) were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms, respectively. The combination arm demonstrated a longer time to tumor progression (TTP) (5.6 versus 4.8 months; P=0.065). Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (except diarrhea) was mild and was similar in the two groups. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17% versus 6%; P=0.04) and diarrhea (12% versus 3%; P=0.05) occurred more frequently in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of irinotecan with docetaxel in platinum-refractory NSCLC prolonged TTP, but did not improve significantly RR, median survival or 1-year survival. Second-line docetaxel monotherapy offers significant and reproducible efficacy in platinum-refractory NSCLC.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory NSGCT were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Twenty-four patients (83%) were considered refractory and five (17%) absolutely refractory to cisplatin. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were assessable for response. Overall, nine patients (32%) achieved a favourable response (complete response, four; partial response, five). One of the complete responders relapsed after 7 months and went into disease-free status lasting for 11+ months after resection of lung metastases. The rest of the complete responders are continuously disease-free at 14+, 19+ and 28+ months with the study regimen plus or minus surgery. One of the complete responders had absolutely cisplatin-refractory disease and another one presented with a late relapse. Toxicity was primarily hematological and generally manageable: 62% of patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, 10% neutropenic fever and 41% grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. Three patients (10%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity and discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of GEMOX is an active, moderately toxic and easily administered regimen in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory NSGCT. The 14% long-term disease-free status accomplished in this heavily pretreated patient population is quite encouraging.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles. RESULTS: The median age was 51 years (range 34-75). Twenty patients (40%) had received three or more chemotherapeutic regimens, 64% had three or four metastatic sites and 78% had visceral metastases. All patients had prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, one patient (2%) achieved a complete response and 16 (32%) a partial response, for a 34% overall response rate. Twenty-one patients (42%) had stable disease and 12 (24%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression was 5.3 months (range 0.5-12.8) and the median overall survival was 12.3 months (range 0.5-19.2). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32% and 18%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by three patients (6%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was reported in 14% of the patients and gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Cycle delays were reported in 28% of patients and dose reductions in 26%. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis were not significant. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV seems to be an active regimen in patients with MBC and prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes with a good safety profile. The incidence of severe toxicity was quite low and the compliance of patients to the treatment was satisfactory. The results obtained with this regimen could be considered encouraging in this heavily pretreated group of breast cancer patients with a high incidence of visceral metastases.