Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Allergy ; 58(12): 1268-76, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14616102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proinflammatory mediators such as the cysteinyl leukotrienes are important in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, given once daily in the morning for treatment of seasonal (fall) allergic rhinitis for 4 weeks. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind trial with a placebo run-in and a 4-week treatment period. Patients (n = 1079) with a history of allergic rhinitis and a positive skin test to seasonal pollen allergens were assigned to placebo, montelukast 10 mg, or loratadine 10 mg. Symptoms were assessed with a daily diary. RESULTS: Montelukast was more effective than placebo in improving scores for the primary endpoint of daytime nasal symptoms (P = 0.003) and the secondary endpoints of night-time, composite, and daytime eye symptoms, patient's and physician's global evaluations of allergic rhinitis, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life (P

Subject(s)
Acetates/therapeutic use , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Sulfides , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Dis Child ; 80(5): 414-20, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10208944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Pediatric Asthma Diary was developed and validated to assess efficacy of interventions in children with asthma. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND SETTING: Diary validation was performed in a three week, prospective study of 106 children aged 6-14 years with asthma. Children were classified at baseline as either stable (requiring no additional asthma treatment) or new onset/worse (requiring either addition of or increase in anti-inflammatory treatment). RESULTS: A daytime symptom scale and "day without asthma" were defined from diary questions. Both measures demonstrated significant validity and responsiveness to anti-inflammatory treatment. The stable group experienced a higher percentage of days without asthma during week 1 compared with the new onset/worse group (39.6% v 11.6%, respectively). The new onset/worse patients experienced significant improvement in days without asthma (24.5%) compared with stable patients (6.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Asthma Diary daytime symptom scale and day without asthma are acceptable measures for use in asthma intervention studies of children aged 6-14 years.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Health Status Indicators , Medical Records , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Asthma/physiopathology , Child , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
Allergy ; 54(1): 64-9, 1999 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10195359

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS, NASONEX ), is a new synthetic corticosteroid with considerable efficacy in the treatment of seasonal and perennial rhinitis and less than 0.1% systemic absorption. This study was designed to evaluate the time of onset of action of MFNS. The subjects were evaluated over the course of 2 weeks during the spring allergy season. METHODS: The effects of MFNS 200 microg given once daily for 2 weeks were evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 201 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Clinically significant onset of action was assessed prospectively by special patient diary cards kept during the first 3 days of treatment. RESULTS: By 12 h after initial dosage (the earliest evaluation), 28% of patients in the MFNS group experienced clinically significant relief, compared with 13% of those given placebo (P = 0.01). Median time to at least moderate symptom relief in patients who received MFNS was 35.9 h, compared with more than 72 h in patients given placebo (P<0.01). By 72 h, 64% of the patients receiving MFNS experienced at least moderate relief, compared with 40% of those treated with placebo (P<0.01). Both patient and physician ratings of symptom severity, response to treatment, and overall condition of rhinitis indicated significant (P<0.01) superiority of MFNS over placebo. MFNS was well tolerated, with adverse events comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: MFNS provided rapid onset of clinically significant symptom relief in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mometasone Furoate , Self Care , Time Factors
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 101(4 Pt 1): 433-8, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9564793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines recommend the use of inhaled antiinflammatory medications in patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Twice daily dosing may increase compliance with therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 400 microg twice daily triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) compared with placebo in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were poorly controlled by beta2-agonist therapy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, including a screening visit, a 7- to 21-day pretreatment baseline phase, and a 6-week double-blind treatment phase. Efficacy was measured by weekly spirometry and daily diary recordings of peak flow rates, asthma symptom scores, and albuterol use. Eligible patients used albuterol four or more times per day, had total asthma symptom scores of 15 or greater (possible total, 60) over 5 of 7 baseline days, and had FEV1 measurements of 60% of predicted value or greater. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients were randomized to treatment. TAA was superior to placebo for all efficacy measures, with significant improvements in asthma symptoms, albuterol use, morning and evening peak flow rates, and forced vital capacity evident at Treatment Week 1. Significant improvements in other pulmonary function measurements were observed after 2 or more weeks. All efficacy variables improved progressively throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Twice daily TAA (400 microg) decreased asthma symptoms and improved lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma compared with placebo. Therapeutic benefit was evident within 1 week and increased throughout treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Triamcinolone Acetonide/therapeutic use , Adult , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate , Middle Aged , Triamcinolone Acetonide/administration & dosage
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 100(6 Pt 1): 781-8, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9438487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antihistamines have been shown to have a variety of therapeutic effects in asthma. Although nasal obstruction may play an important role in modulating lower airway function, no prior trial has used a decongestant in combination with an antihistamine in patients with allergic rhinitis and concomitant asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of loratadine (5 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (120 mg) (L/P) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L/P in 193 subjects during the fall allergy season. Nasal and chest symptoms, albuterol use, and peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily for 6 weeks. Spirometry was measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of therapy, and health-related quality of life was rated at the beginning and end of the study. RESULTS: Total rhinitis and asthma symptom severity scores were significantly reduced in patients receiving active therapy compared with those receiving placebo throughout the 6-week study. Peak expiratory flow rates improved significantly in patients treated with L/P during weeks 2 through 6 (peak effect [mean +/- SEM]: L/P, 26.23 +/- 4.64 L/min vs placebo, 8.52 +/- 3.53 L/min, p = 0.002) as did FEV1 (peak effect [mean +/- SEM]: L/P, 170 +/- 53 ml vs placebo, 20 +/- 40 ml, p = 0.01) at all clinic visits. In addition, select measures of asthma-specific quality of life improved significantly relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: L/P significantly improved nasal and asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant mild asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/physiopathology , Child , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Ephedrine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Loratadine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
6.
South Med J ; 89(12): 1130-9; quiz 1140-1, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8969344

ABSTRACT

Between 15 and 30 million Americans have allergic rhinitis. Costs of diminished job and school performance extend beyond the financial burden of treatment, taking their toll in worker productivity and school absences. Therapeutic approaches include allergen avoidance, pharmaceuticals, and allergy immunotherapy. Among the pharmaceutical agents, decongestants, anti-inflammatory drugs, and antihistamines relieve allergic rhinitis symptoms. Often, decongestants are prescribed along with antihistamines to provide maximum relief. Anti-inflammatory agents such as cromolyn sodium and topical corticosteroids are efficacious despite their delayed effect. However, allergic rhinitis is most frequently treated with antihistamines. Today's antihistamines have minimal sedative effects and cholinergic actions, are safe to use, and do not impair performance.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Humans , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/economics , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 98(4): 724-31, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8876546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Topical nasal corticosteroids have become a mainstay of treatment for the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). It is likely that topical corticosteroids, by blocking an initial influx of inflammatory cells in the nasal mucosa induced by aeroallergens, may have a preventive effect on nasal allergy symptoms when administered before the pollen season. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an 8-week course of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS), 200 micrograms once daily, in the treatment of SAR compared with beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray (BDP), 168 micrograms twice daily, and placebo vehicle, when treatment is initiated before the anticipated onset of the ragweed season. METHODS: Three hundred forty-nine patients with SAR to ragweed pollen from nine centers in the Northeast and Midwest of the United States were randomized to one of the three intranasal study medications (MFNS, 200 micrograms once daily, BDP, 168 micrograms twice daily, or placebo vehicle), starting 4 weeks before the estimated start of the ragweed season. RESULTS: The proportion of "minimal symptom" days (total nasal symptom score < or = 2) was statistically significantly higher in both the MFNS and BDP groups when compared with the placebo vehicle group (p < 0.01). The two active treatment groups were not statistically significantly different from each other. MFNS and BDP displayed a similar safety profile that did not differ from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that MFNS, 200 micrograms (once daily), is a useful therapy in the prophylactic treatment of SAR.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Beclomethasone/administration & dosage , Beclomethasone/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Mometasone Furoate , Pregnadienediols/adverse effects
8.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 97(3): 749-55, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8613630

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of antihistamines with topical nasal corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray at a dose of 110 micro g in each nostril once daily with 10 mg of oral astemizole once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in 239 patients who were randomized to receive either triamcinolone acetonide or astemizole. A 5-day, drug-free, lead-in period was followed by 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. One hundred four patients treated with triamcinolone acetonide and 105 patients treated with astemizole could be evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, triamcinolone acetonide was more effective than astemizole in reducing total nasal symptoms, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing (p

Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Astemizole/therapeutic use , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Triamcinolone Acetonide/therapeutic use , Administration, Intranasal , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Astemizole/administration & dosage , Astemizole/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiology , Triamcinolone Acetonide/administration & dosage , Triamcinolone Acetonide/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...