Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg ; 80(3): 143-148, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30818408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare cerebrovascular condition, often presenting as a headache or stroke in adults. Anesthetic management of this illness may challenge providers because it can affect the long-term neurologic outcome and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with MMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted to assess etiology and epidemiology, as well as existing reports of intraoperative management of MMD. Due to sparse findings, the search was expanded to include studies of the use of intraoperative anesthetic agents during other neurosurgical procedures. We also retrospectively reviewed all MMD cases from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2015, at Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center, where intraoperative management involved craniotomy and surgical revascularization. Data were collected primarily on the use of several anesthetic agents. The LOS and any adverse events were also recorded for each case. The data were divided into two equivalent case cohorts: (1) January 1, 2009, to February 18, 2013, and (2) February 19, 2013, to December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Remifentanil use notably increased between the first and second time periods while fentanyl use decreased. Desflurane usage also demonstrated an observed increase when our two cohorts were compared. Additionally, there was a decrease in the mean LOS between the first and second periods of 3.9 and 3.3 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increasing use of remifentanil in MMD cases could be attributed to its ability to provide more stable hemodynamics during induction, maintenance, and emergence of anesthesia when compared with fentanyl. Lower systolic pressures, diastolic pressures, and heart rates were reported in patients receiving remifentanil over fentanyl.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Cerebral Revascularization/methods , Craniotomy/methods , Moyamoya Disease/surgery , Hemodynamics , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 30(3): 251-257, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral intake for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is often not an option because of facial trauma, swallowing dysfunctions, altered consciousness, etc. These patients often require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement for nutrition support. To date, there is lack of studies examining the relationship between the timing of PEG placement and patient outcome in the TBI group. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study in a retrospective cohort of TBI patients undergoing PEG, using the national inpatient sample for years 2011 to 2013. RESULTS: A total of 96,625 patients were identified for TBI and 3343 of those patients received PEG. TBI patients who undergo an early or late PEG placement had a higher rate of in-hospital mortality, when compared with patients with a standard timing of PEG placement. Late PEG was preferably placed in patients with higher Charlson index and trauma-related comorbidities, and these patients had a higher incidence of complications, that is, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute respiratory distress syndrome/pneumonia, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism. When stratified by mortality-risk groups, early PEG was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality while standard PEG was associated with best mortality outcomes in low-mortality-risk group and moderate-mortality-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that if a PEG placement is indicated for a TBI patient, a standard (7 to 14 d) timing may be associated with better patient outcomes. However, secondary to limitations associated with the use of administrative databases, further prospective studies are needed to establish clear guidelines regarding the optimal timing of placing PEG in TBI patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Gastrostomy/methods , Gastrostomy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
4.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 31(5): 1751-1757, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28864160

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from years 2010 through 2012 was utilized to determine the incidence, predictive risk factors, and outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients undergoing vascular surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study. SETTING: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2011 through 2013) using specific International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes corresponding with vascular surgery. PARTICIPANTS: 425,379 hospital admissions in patients which underwent vascular surgery. Among these, 1,290 (0.31%) were diagnosed with HIT, and 17,765 (4.18%) were diagnosed with secondary thrombocytopenia. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The incidence of HIT is 0.3% in the vascular surgery population. The highest incidence is observed in thoraco-subclavian and vein reconstruction procedures. This study indicated that liver disease, endocarditis, chronic renal failure, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, obesity, and female sex are associated with a higher incidence of HIT in this population. In vascular surgery patients, HIT can increase mortality by 3-fold and lead to severe complications such as acute renal failure, venous embolism, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: The incidence of HIT in the vascular surgery population is similar to previously reported incidence in cardiac surgery patients. In the vascular surgery population, mortality increases 3-fold in patients with HIT versus those without any thrombocytopenia. Understanding the associated risk factors and complications will allow clinicians to make informed decisions and anticipate HIT and associated complications in certain high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Young Adult
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 31(4): 1268-1274, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800983

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in cardiac and aortic surgery using recent versions of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) to provide clinicians with a better understanding of these uncommon but potentially serious complications. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: NIS database 2010-2012. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac and aortic aneurysm repair surgeries. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The most common GI complication was postoperative ileus, which also had the lowest mortality, followed by GI hemorrhage. Mesenteric ischemia demonstrated the highest mortality, followed by intestinal perforation. Mortality was highest in those with infective endocarditis (16.02%), followed by myocardial infarction (12.48%). GI complications were highest in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, followed by off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated that GI complications after cardiac surgery occurred at a rate of 4.17%, which is similar to that reported in the NIS database from 1998 to 2002 in coronary artery bypass grafting patients, but higher than that previously described in single-center studies. GI complications after cardiac surgery increased inpatient mortality 3-fold and more than doubled length of stay. Improved recognition and understanding of the predisposing risk factors and complications elucidated in this study could serve to increase the necessity for timely diagnosis and treatment of patients at high risk for GI complications after cardiac surgery.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/mortality , Population Surveillance , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Mortality/trends , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Pain Physician ; 20(5): 413-418, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28727704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a relatively straightforward regional technique used for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. Various adjuvants have been used in past to prolong the duration of action of analgesia in peripheral nerve blocks. Several studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone added to local anesthetic agents, such as bupivacaine, have shown promising results. However, there are few studies comparing the efficacy of dexamethasone with ropivacaine. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the addition of dexamethasone 8 mg to ropivacaine 0.2% in a TAP block would prolong the analgesic effect when compared with ropivacaine 0.2% alone after inguinal hernia repair and spermatocelectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. METHODS: A total of 82 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair or spermatocelectomy were enrolled in the study, of which 41 patients received TAP block with ropivacaine with saline, and the other 41 received ropivacaine with dexamethasone immediately following surgery. Both the proceduralist (resident) and the patient were blinded to the solution used. Visual analog pain scores (0 - 10) were obtained pre-block and immediately post block. Our primary endpoint was visual analog pain score at 12 hours, with 24 and 48-hour pain scores as the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The averaged pre-block pain score was 7.6 ± 1.7 in the saline group and 7.7 ± 2.2 in the dexamethasone group. There was an improvement in the pain scores from the baseline, at 12 hours after the administration of the block in both the groups. Although the dexamethasone group had a greater change in pain score (-3.2) than the saline group (-2.2), the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (0.08). We did not observe significant differences in change from baseline at 24 hours and 48 hours between the 2 groups (P value = 0.74 and 0.44, respectively). LIMITATIONS: We did not assess the total dose of analgesics used during the surgery with the assumption that the effect of intraoperative analgesics should wear off by the time we collect the 12-hour pain score. We did not control for the expertise of the provider that performed the block, as some of the providers may have been junior residents with limited experience and expertise in the area. Additionally, we were unable to include postoperative opioid consumption due to concerns of inconsistencies during patient reporting and data quality. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we could not show a statistically significant prolongation of analgesia for TAP blocks with ropivacaine when dexamethasone was added, though there was a one point drop in pain score at 12 hours post block when dexamethasone was added to the block solution. This decrease in pain scores at 12 hours may still be beneficial to patient satisfaction given the low side effect profile of dexamethasone. As ropivacaine has a lower pH than other local anesthetic agents, further well designed studies are needed to investigate the combination of this drug with more alkaline drugs like corticosteroids. KEY WORDS: Regional anesthesia, transversus abdominis plane, dexamethasone, ropivacaine.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles/drug effects , Amides/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Neuromuscular Blockade/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Amides/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ropivacaine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...