Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Ultrason ; 21(85): e162-e168, 2021 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258042

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound is a fast, accessible, reliable, and radiation-free imaging modality routinely used to assess the soft tissues around the shoulder. It enables to identify a wide range of pathological conditions. Furthermore, most ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the shoulder produce better results in terms of accuracy and clinical efficacy than those performed in a blinded fashion. Indeed, intra-articular and peri-articular interventional procedures can be easily performed under continuous ultrasound monitoring to ensure the correct position of the needle and to deliver the medication to a specific target. Several technical approaches and medications can be used to treat different causes of painful shoulder. Intra-articular injections are applied to treat acromioclavicular osteoarthritis as well as glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis and adhesive capsulitis. Subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, either presenting as a primary inflammatory condition or secondary to rotator cuff disorders, can be easily approached using ultrasound guidance to aspirate synovial effusion and to inject medications. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation is a well-established technique increasingly applied to treat patients with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. Also, degenerative rotator cuff tendinopathy can be conservatively treated by image-guided interventions, specifically with needling under ultrasound guidance that can be associated with injections of platelet-rich plasma. Lastly, periarticular peripheral nerve block can be quickly and safely performed under ultrasound guidance, particularly in conditions involving the suprascapular nerve in the setting of pre-operative analgesia or pain treatment in glenohumeral osteoarthritis and adhesive capsulitis. In this article, the most common ultrasound-guided procedures around the shoulder have been reviewed to discuss indications and techniques.

2.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 74(8): 1164-1172, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The growing interest of medical community about sarcopenia resulted in the production of several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), with an unavoidable variability in terms of the overall quality of those publications. Our aim is to evaluate the quality of CPGs on sarcopenia using the AGREE II instrument. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We performed an online literature search for sarcopenia CPGs using different databases. Four independent reviewers evaluated the quality of CPGs using the AGREE II instrument. To classify the quality of each guideline, we defined specific thresholds of final score: high-quality if five or more domains scored >60%; average-quality if three or four domains scored >60%; low-quality if ≤2 domains scored >60%. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 315 articles, and after applying exclusion criteria our final analysis included 19 CPGs. The overall quality of CPGs was remarkable, as 13/19 (68.4%) were considered of "high-quality" CPGs, with more than four domains reached a score higher than 60%. "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity of Presentations" had the best domain results (78.4% and 73.8%, respectively), while the two domains with the lowest scores were "Rigor of Development" and "Applicability" (61.5% and 58.7%, respectively). Interobserver variability ranged between moderate (0.624) and fair (0.275). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the overall quality of CPGs about sarcopenia was noteworthy, as more than two-third of paper obtained a "high-quality" score. The domain "applicability" had the lowest score, suggesting that emphasis should be put on possible strategies for helping other doctors to implement guideline recommendations in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Sarcopenia , Databases, Factual , Humans , Observer Variation , Sarcopenia/therapy
3.
Radiol Med ; 125(5): 481-490, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020529

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the current literature concerning the role of superb microvascular imaging (SMI), a novel Doppler technique that enables detection of fine vessels and slow blood flow, in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: An online search of the literature was conducted for the period 2013 to April 2019 and included original articles written in English language. A data analysis was performed at the end of the literature search. RESULTS: Eight original articles with prospective design and one with retrospective design were included in this review: 4 studies focused on rheumatoid arthritis, 2 on rheumatoid and other arthritides, 1 on lateral epicondylosis and 2 on carpal tunnel syndrome. Sample size ranged from 26 to 83 patients. Despite some methodological differences, all studies compared the performance of SMI with that of a conventional Doppler technique such as power and color Doppler and found an improvement in vascularity detection with SMI. The main variations were in sample size, evaluated parameters and vascularity interpretation methods. Inter-observer agreement for SMI ranged from moderate to excellent. CONCLUSIONS: SMI is a promising tool for the diagnosis and treatment planning of different musculoskeletal disorders. Future investigations should include larger samples of patients with long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Microvessels/diagnostic imaging , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Arthritis/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Blood Flow Velocity , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/physiopathology , Humans , Microvessels/physiopathology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/physiopathology , Nerve Compression Syndromes/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Compression Syndromes/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Tendinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Tendinopathy/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/diagnostic imaging , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/methods
4.
Radiol Med ; 123(8): 593-600, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637389

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess image quality when using dual-energy CT (DECT) to reduce metal artifacts in subjects with knee and hip prostheses. METHODS: Twenty-two knee and 10 hip prostheses were examined in 31 patients using a DECT protocol (tube voltages 100 and 140 kVp). Monoenergetic reconstructions were extrapolated at 64, 69, 88, 105, 110, 120, 140, 170, and 190 kilo-electron volts (keV) and the optimal energy was manually selected. The B60-140 and Fast DE reconstructions were made by CT. The image quality and diagnostic value were subjectively and objectively determined. Double-blind qualitative assessment was performed by two radiologists using a Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed by a third radiologist within the most evident streak artifacts on every image. Another ROI was placed in surrounding tissues without artifacts as a reference. RESULTS: The inter-reader agreement for the qualitative assessment was nearly 100%. The best overall image quality (37.8% rated "excellent") was the Fast DE Siemens reconstruction, followed by B60-140 and Opt KeV (20.5 and 10.2% rated excellent). On the other hand, DECT images at 64, 69 and 88 keV had the worse scores. The number of artifacts was significantly different between monoenergetic images. Nevertheless, because of the high number of pairwise comparisons, no differences were found in the post hoc analysis except for a trend toward statistical significance when comparing the 170 and 64 keV doses. CONCLUSIONS: DECT with specific post-processing may reduce metal artifacts and significantly enhance the image quality and diagnostic value when evaluating metallic implants.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Hip Prosthesis , Knee Prosthesis , Metals , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
5.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 17(1): 3, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26739150

ABSTRACT

OPINION STATEMENT: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) currently is performed to stage and treat ovarian cancer at different stages of disease; however, the higher level of evidence from existing studies is IIB. Despite the absence of randomized controlled trials, MIS represents a safe and adequate procedure for treating and staging early ovarian cancer, and its use has increased significantly in clinical practice. Major concerns are related to minimizing tumor disruption or dissemination, removing the adnexal mass intact, adequate retroperitoneal staging, and fertility-sparing surgery for young patients. The main goal for patients with advanced ovarian cancer is to determine the best therapeutic strategy by evaluating the risks and benefits of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. The use of staging laparoscopy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer appears to be the most researched and accepted approach. Regarding other types and stages of ovarian cancer, although the evidence is very promising, clinical trials performed by expert gynecologic oncology surgeons in referral centers are still needed to prove the efficacy of such an approach in these patients. In particular, MIS has provided an opportunity to remove localized recurrences, with both retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal diffusion.


Subject(s)
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 31(2): 203-12, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25358811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) represent a group of inheritable lysosomal storage diseases caused by mutations in the genes coding for enzymes involved in catabolism of different glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). They are clinically heterogeneous multisystemic diseases, often involving the spine. Bony abnormalities of the spine included in the so-called dysostosis multiplex and GAG deposits in the dura mater and supporting ligaments can result in spinal cord compression, which can lead to compressive myelopathy. Spinal involvement is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in some MPS (e.g., MPS IVA, VI, and I), and early radiological diagnosis is critical in preventing or arresting neurological deterioration and loss of function. DISCUSSION: Management of MPS, however, requires a multidisciplinary approach because of the multiorgan nature of the disease. Indeed in order to appreciate the relevance and nuances of each other's specialty, radiologists and clinicians need to have a background of common knowledge, rather than a merely compartmentalized point of view. In the interest of the management of spinal involvement in MPS, this review article aims on one hand to provide radiologists with important clinical knowledge and on the other hand to equip clinicians with relevant radiological semiotics.


Subject(s)
Mucopolysaccharidoses/complications , Spinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Spinal Diseases/pathology , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Spine/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...