Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Acute Stroke Patients.

PURPOSE: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can change the excitability of the central nervous system and contribute to motor recovery of stroke patients. The aim of our study was to examine the short- and long-term effects of real versus sham bihemispheric tDCS combined with repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with acute stroke and a severe motor impairment. METHODS: The study was prospective, randomized, double blind, and placebo controlled. Nineteen acute stroke patients (ischemic and hemorrhagic) with upper limb Fugl-Meyer mean score of <19 were randomized in two groups: one group received five consecutive daily sessions of anodal tDCS over the affected hemisphere and cathodal over unaffected hemisphere combined with repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation and the other received sham tDCS associated to repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation. Clinical and neurophysiological assessment was applied before tDCS, 5 days after tDCS, and 3, 6, and 12 months after tDCS. RESULTS: There were significant time-related changes in both groups of patients in motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, Hmax:Mmax ratio, upper limb Fugl-Meyer scores, and Modified Ashworth scales scores ( P < 0.05). However, no significant differences between groups were present at any time ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bihemispheric tDCS and repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation with the parameters of our study did not add significant short- or long-term clinical improvement or change in neurophysiological data in severe acute stroke patients in comparison to sham stimulation. The severity of motor impairment in stroke patients may influence a possible response to an interventional tDCS treatment.

New-onset non-lesional aphasic status epilepticus. Clinical description, diagnostic clues, and treatment algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: De novo aphasic status epilepticus (ASE) in patients without a previous history of epilepsy and without cerebral lesions (aphasic NOSE) is rare. The aim of the study is to describe its clinical characteristics, etiologies, and outcome. MATERIALS & METHODS: Single-center study including consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department between 2011 and 2019 with acute aphasia, which was finally diagnosed as aphasic NOSE. Subsequent episodes of aphasia (>5 min) were recorded and divided into confirmed ASE and postictal aphasic episodes (non-ASE). Clinical characteristics of the two types of episodes were compared. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, suffering fifty episodes of epileptic aphasia, episodes per patient 2.6 (range 1-7). Fifteen patients (71.4%) were women, mean age at ASE onset was 66.05 years old (SD 6.3). Nine (47%) patients died, 6 of them (66.7%) during the aphasic episode. Ictal EEG was available in 37 episodes, confirming the diagnosis of ASE in 12 episodes; in 8 episodes, the EEG fulfilled the criteria of possible ASE. The most frequent etiologies were inflammatory and vascular. Comparing ASE with non-ASE episodes, ASE was longer than non-ASE (225 vs 65 h, p .024) and was treated more frequently with BZD (76 vs 24%, p .001) but with a longer delay (22.2 vs 1.5 h, p .06). CONCLUSIONS: ASE is a treatable, highly relapsing emergency, with the subsequent relapses ASE or postictal aphasia. EEG is diagnostic in half of the patients, while in others imaging techniques are also useful. Benzodiazepines should be administered. Persistent aphasia, of more than 65 hours' duration, is highly suggestive of ASE.

Risk of Developing Epilepsy after Autoimmune Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASS) are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), but the risk of developing epilepsy as a sequela of AE remains unknown, and factors predisposing the development of epilepsy have not been fully identified. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of developing epilepsy in AE and study related risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single centre study including patients diagnosed with AE according to criteria described by Graus et al., with a minimum follow-up of 12 months after AE resolution. The sample was divided according to whether patients developed epilepsy or not. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included; 3 (15.8%) had AE with intracellular antibodies, 9 (47.4%) with extracellular antibodies, and 7 (36.8%) were seronegative. During follow-up, 3 patients (15.8%) died, 4 (21.1%) presented relapses of AE, and 11 (57.89%) developed epilepsy. There was a significant association between the development of epilepsy and the presence of hippocampal atrophy in control brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p = 0.037), interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) on control electroencephalogram (EEG) (p = 0.045), and immunotherapy delay (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Hippocampal atrophy in neuroimaging, IED on EEG during follow-up, and immunotherapy delay could be predictors of the development of epilepsy in patients with AE.

Usefulness of HMPAO-SPECT in the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) can pose a challenge. Electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns can be difficult to interpret, and the absence of an EEG correlate does not rule out the diagnosis of NCSE. In this setting, neuroimaging tools to help in the diagnosis are crucial. Our aim was to evaluate the role of 99mTc-hexamethyl propyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and quantitative HMPAO-SPECT (QtSPECT) in patients with clinical suspicion of NCSE, and to evaluate their value in the final diagnosis of NCSE. METHODS: We recruited consecutive patients admitted in our center with suspicion of NCSE, and selected those who underwent an HMPAO-SPECT. All patients were admitted to the neurology ward and underwent an EEG. We divided the patients into those who were finally with diagnosed NCSE (NCSE-p) and those who were not (non-NCSE) according to the Salzburg Diagnostic EEG criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tools were calculated. The SPECTs were acquired in a Skylight SPECT (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam). The injections were done during the clinical episode suspected of being an NCSE. The HMPAO-SPECT was analyzed by two experts and was also quantified. All data were normalized to the SPM SPECT template. We used an external healthy normal database to obtain a Z-score map for each individual versus the normal database. The Z-score maximum (Zmax) was extracted from each region of the AAL atlas as was the percentage of voxels with a Z-score higher than 2.5 (N(%)). A logistic regression combining the Zmax, N(%), and the effect of patient age was fitted to predict the final NCSE diagnosis. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were obtained to evaluate the classification performance. RESULTS: We included 55 patients, 21 of them women (38.9%), with a median age of 62.1 years old (range 25-84). Thirty-six patients were with diagnosed NCSE (62.9%). Initial EEG had a sensitivity of 61.1% and a specificity of 89%. Most of the patients were critically ill with diagnostic difficulties, and it could be one of the main reasons to find low sensitivity of the Salzburg diagnostic EEG criteria. The Zmax and N(%) were significantly higher in NCSE-p than in non-NCSE (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). The HMPAO-SPECT qualitative analysis had a sensitivity of 80.5% and specificity of 89.5% while QtSPECT had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81%. CONCLUSION: Both 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT and QtSPECT can be useful in the diagnosis of NCSE. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures".

Music-supported therapy in the rehabilitation of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

The effect of music-supported therapy (MST) as a tool to restore hemiparesis of the upper extremity after a stroke has not been appropriately contrasted with conventional therapy. The aim of this trial was to test the effectiveness of adding MST to a standard rehabilitation program in subacute stroke patients. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients were randomized to MST or conventional therapy in addition to the rehabilitation program. The intensity and duration of the interventions were equated in both groups. Before and after 4 weeks of treatment, motor and cognitive functions, mood, and quality of life (QoL) of participants were evaluated. A follow-up at 3 months was conducted to examine the retention of motor gains. Both groups significantly improved their motor function, and no differences between groups were found. The only difference between groups was observed in the language domain for QoL. Importantly, an association was encountered between the capacity to experience pleasure from music activities and the motor improvement in the MST group. MST as an add-on treatment showed no superiority to conventional therapies for motor recovery. Importantly, patient's intrinsic motivation to engage in musical activities was associated with better motor improvement.

Evaluation of afferent pain pathways in adrenomyeloneuropathic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with adrenomyeloneuropathy may have dysfunctions of visual, auditory, motor and somatosensory pathways. We thought on examining the nociceptive pathways by means of laser evoked potentials (LEPs), to obtain additional information on the pathophysiology of this condition. METHODS: In 13 adrenomyeloneuropathic patients we examined LEPs to leg, arm and face stimulation. Normative data were obtained from 10 healthy subjects examined in the same experimental conditions. We also examined brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), pattern reversal full-field visual evoked potentials (VEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). RESULTS: Upper and lower limb MEPs and SEPs, as well as BAEPs, were abnormal in all patients, while VEPs were abnormal in 3 of them (23.1%). LEPs revealed abnormalities to stimulation of the face in 4 patients (30.7%), the forearm in 4 patients (30.7%) and the leg in 10 patients (76.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The pathologic process of adrenomyeloneuropathy is characterized by a preferential involvement of auditory, motor and somatosensory tracts and less severely of the visual and nociceptive pathways. This non-inflammatory distal axonopathy preferably damages large myelinated spinal tracts but there is also partial involvement of small myelinated fibres. SIGNIFICANCE: LEPs studies can provide relevant information about afferent pain pathways involvement in adrenomyeloneuropathic patients.