ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare weight loss and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)-reduction effects of two obesity-centric, weight-loss management approaches (with or without anti-obesity medication) versus usual glucose-centric care in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, open-label, 3-armed, parallel-group, pragmatic, noninferiority trial, July 2020 to August 2022. Adults enrolled in the Cleveland Clinic Employee Health Plan (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2, type 2 diabetes diagnosis, HbA1c > 7.5%) were randomized to usual glucose-centric management ("Usual-Care" group) or one of two obesity-centric management strategies: participation in a weight management program plus anti-obesity medication ("WMP + AOM" group), or WMP participation without anti-obesity medication ("WMP-Only" group). Primary endpoints were changes in weight and HbA1c, baseline to month 12. RESULTS: Due to enrollment and retention challenges, largely related to COVID-19, only 74/300 planned participants were randomized and the study was terminated early. Participants were predominantly female (59%), median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 53.5 (47, 60) years, 68% white, with baseline median (IQR) BMI and HbA1c of 37.4 (34.2, 42.7) kg/m2 and 8.8% (7.9%, 10.4%), respectively. At month 12, mean (90% confidence interval [CI]) percentage weight change in the Usual-Care, WMP-Only, and WMP + AOM groups was - 4.5% (- 6.5%, - 2.5%), - 6.7% (- 8.7%, - 4.7%), and - 8.7% (- 10.7%, - 6.8%), respectively; mean (90% CI) HbA1c change was - 1.7% (- 2.1%, - 1.2%), - 2.2% (- 2.7%, - 1.8%), and - 2.2% (- 2.6%, - 1.7%), respectively. WMP + AOM was superior to Usual-Care for weight change (P = 0.02); both WMP + AOM and WMP-Only were noninferior (P ≤ 0.01) to Usual-Care for change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Including anti-obesity medication was associated with superior weight loss with noninferior HbA1c reductions, warranting further evaluation in larger study populations of obesity-focused approaches to type 2 diabetes management. Graphical abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03799198.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The appropriate cosyntropin dose during cosyntropin stimulation tests remains uncertain. We conducted a prospective, randomized pilot study to compare 1 µg IV low dose cosyntropin test, 25 µg IM medium dose cosyntropin test, and 250 µg IM standard dose cosyntropin test to evaluate secondary adrenal insufficiency. Insulin tolerance test was used as the gold standard. METHOD: The study included patients with hypothalamic/pituitary disease (n = 10) with at least one pituitary axis deficiency other than ACTH deficiency and controls (n = 12). All tests were done in random order. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for total cortisol and serum free cortisol cut-off levels during cosyntropin stimulation tests. RESULTS: The median (range) age and F/M sex ratios for patients and controls were 54 years (23-62), 2/8, and 33 years (21-51), 6/6, respectively. The best total cortisol cut-off during low dose cosyntropin test, medium dose cosyntropin test, 30 min and 60 min standard dose cosyntropin test were 14.6 µg/dL (100% sensitivity & specificity), 18.7 µg/dL (100% sensitivity, 88% specificity), 16.1 (100% sensitivity & specificity), and 19.5 µg/dL (100% sensitivity & specificity), respectively. There was no difference in the ROC curve for cortisol values between the cosyntropin stimulation tests (p > 0.41). Using a cortisol cut-off of 18 µg/dL during cosyntropin stimulation tests, only cortisol level at 30 min during standard dose cosyntropin test provided discrimination similar to insulin tolerance test. The best peak free cortisol cut-off levels were 1 µg/dL for insulin tolerance test, 0.9 µg/dL for low dose cosyntropin test, 0.9 µg/dL for medium dose cosyntropin test, and 0.9 µg/dL and 1.3 µg/dL for 30 min and 60 min standard dose cosyntropin test, respectively. CONCLUSION: All cosyntropin stimulation tests had excellent correlations with insulin tolerance test, when appropriate cut-offs were used. This pilot study does not suggest an advantage in using 25 µg cosyntropin dose during the cosyntropin stimulation test. A serum free cortisol cut-off of 0.9 µg/dL may be used as pass criterion during low dose cosyntropin test, standard dose cosyntropin test cosyntropin test, and 30 min standard dose cosyntropin test.
