Outcomes and factors associated with cryptococcal disease among cirrhotics: A study of the national inpatient sample 2005 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcal disease (CD) confers a higher mortality in cirrhotic patients compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Factor association for CD in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. Our aim was to determine the incidence, demographic, and comorbidities associated with CD among cirrhotic patients in the United States (US). METHOD: Retrospective analysis of admissions of cirrhotic patients, with or without CD, using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2014. The number of admissions were reported in raw and weighted frequencies. The trends of CD among cirrhotic patients and overall CD were evaluated. Rao-Scott chi-square, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to evaluate variables and CD among cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: There were 886,962 admissions for cirrhosis, and 164 of these with CD. By adjusted odds ratio (AOR), CD was more often associated with cirrhosis in Southern (2.95; 95 % CI 1.24, 7.02) and Western regions (4.45; 95 % CI 1.91, 10.37), Hispanic patients (1.80; 95 % CI 1.01, 3.20), and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (3.13; 95 % CI 2.09, 4.69). Of note, CD in cirrhotic patients was associated with higher inpatient mortality (AOR of 3.89, 95 % CI 2.53, 5.99), longer length of stay (9.87 vs. 4.88 days), and a higher total charge ($76,880 vs. $ 37,227) when compared to cirrhotic patients without CD. DISCUSSION: Patients with cirrhosis admitted with CD have a high inpatient mortality. The geographical location and CKD were important factors associated with CD among cirrhotic patients. Autoimmune liver diseases and immunosuppression did not appear to increase the risk of CD.

A Prospective Multimodal Education Intervention for Providers Does Not Increase Hepatic Encephalopathy Treatment Rates.

BACKGROUND: Over 50% of hospitalizations from hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are preventable, but patients often do not receive medical treatment. AIMS: To use a multimodal education intervention (MMEI) to increase HE treatment rates and to evaluate (1) trends in HE treatment, (2) predictors of receiving treatment, and (3) the impact of treatment on hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: Prospective single-center cohort study of patients hospitalized with HE from April 1, 2020-September 30, 2022. The first 15 months were a control ("pre-MMEI"), the subsequent 15 months (MMEI) included three phases: (1) prior authorization resources, (2) electronic order set, and (3) in-person provider education. Treatment included receiving any drug (lactulose or rifaximin), or combination therapy. Treatment rates pre- vs. post-MMEI were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: 471 patients were included. There were lower odds of receiving any drug post-MMEI (p = 0.03). There was no difference in receiving combination therapy pre- or post-MMEI (p = 0.32). Predictors of receiving any drug included alcohol-related or cryptogenic cirrhosis (p's < 0.001), and the presence of ascites (p = 0.005) and/or portal hypertension (p = 0.003). The only significant predictor of not receiving any drug treatment was having autoimmune cirrhosis (p < 0.001). Patients seen by internal medicine (p = 0.01) or who were intoxicated (p = 0.02) were less likely to receive rifaximin. Any treatment was associated with higher 30-day liver disease-specific readmission (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This MMEI did not increase HE treatment rates, suggesting that alternative strategies are needed to identify and address barriers to treatment.

Evaluating online patient education materials for liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver cirrhosis affects 4.5 million adults in the United States (US). As more patients educate themselves online, we evaluated the accessibility, quality, understandability, accuracy, readability, and comprehensiveness (AQUA-RC) of online patient education materials for cirrhosis. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis using Google® and YouTube® on a cleared internet browser from 12 cities across the US. The authors independently reviewed the top 25 search results from each platform using search terms "liver cirrhosis" and "cirrhosis". Accessibility was evaluated from twelve cities in six regions across the US. We evaluated resource quality using the DISCERN score, understandability using the PEMAT score, readability using the Flesch-Kinkaid score, and accuracy/comprehensiveness using a list of author-generated criteria. AQUA-RC was compared between 1) academic websites (AW) vs. non-academic websites (NAW), and 2) websites vs. YouTube® videos. RESULTS: 28 websites and 25 videos were included. Accessibility was equal across all regions. Websites had higher average quality scores than videos, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.84). Websites were more understandable than videos (p < 0.00001). Both websites and videos were 100% accurate. Readability for websites was higher than recommended standards. Websites were more comprehensive than videos (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Online patient education materials for cirrhosis in the US are equally accessible, but readability and understandability are too complex. Websites are of greater quality, accuracy, and comprehensiveness than YouTube videos, which are often narrowly focused and targeted at the medical community rather than patients. Further efforts should be made to improve online patient education and expand content across platforms.

You can't handle the truth! Comparing serum phosphatidylethanol to self-reported alcohol intake in chronic liver disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Serum phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing has emerged as a promising biomarker for assessing recent alcohol consumption, surpassing the limitations of self-reported data. Limited clinical data exists comparing PEth levels and patients' reported alcohol intake. AIMS: Compare PEth testing results with self-reported alcohol intake and assesses variables associated with underreporting. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of chronic liver disease and serum PEth. A patient's first positive PEth (>/=10 ng/mL) and self-reported alcohol consumption was used. PEth results were categorized as mild (10-20), moderate (20-200), or heavy (>200). Severity measures between self-report and PEth were assessed using Bhapkar's test and Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar's tests. Demographic data was analyzed using Chi-Square tests. RESULTS: 279 patients were included. 94 (33.7%) patients had consistency with self-report, and 185 patients had inconsistencies in their report (66.3%, p < 0.001). Of 279 patients, 161 (57.7%) underreported their alcohol consumption, and 55 (19.7%) heavy PEth patients underreported alcohol consumption as light. 58% of alcohol-related and 56.4% of non-alcohol-related cirrhotic patients underreported their alcohol use. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, only one third of self-reported alcohol consumption was consistent with the PEth level. Notably, 57.7% underreported alcohol intake. Our study reinforces the clinical importance of PEth testing as an objective clinical measure.

Artificial intelligence compared with human-derived patient educational materials on cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The study compared the readability, grade level, understandability, actionability, and accuracy of standard patient educational material against artificial intelligence chatbot-derived patient educational material regarding cirrhosis. METHODS: An identical standardized phrase was used to generate patient educational materials on cirrhosis from 4 large language model-derived chatbots (ChatGPT, DocsGPT, Google Bard, and Bing Chat), and the outputs were compared against a pre-existing human-derived educational material (Epic). Objective scores for readability and grade level were determined using Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scoring systems. 14 patients/caregivers and 8 transplant hepatologists were blinded and independently scored the materials on understandability and actionability and indicated whether they believed the material was human or artificial intelligence-generated. Understandability and actionability were determined using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials. Transplant hepatologists also provided medical accuracy scores. RESULTS: Most educational materials scored similarly in readability and grade level but were above the desired sixth-grade reading level. All educational materials were deemed understandable by both groups, while only the human-derived educational material (Epic) was considered actionable by both groups. No significant difference in perceived actionability or understandability among the educational materials was identified. Both groups poorly identified which materials were human-derived versus artificial intelligence-derived. CONCLUSIONS: Chatbot-derived patient educational materials have comparable readability, grade level, understandability, and accuracy to human-derived materials. Readability, grade level, and actionability may be appropriate targets for improvement across educational materials on cirrhosis. Chatbot-derived patient educational materials show promise, and further studies should assess their usefulness in clinical practice.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis.

Background/Aims: Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference. Methods: Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States. Results: aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio. Conclusions: Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.

Mortality Increased Among Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Before and Following Different Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted patient care and worsened the morbidity and mortality of some chronic diseases. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalizations and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis both before and during different time periods of the pandemic has not been evaluated. AIMS: Describe characteristics of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and evaluate inpatient mortality and 30-day readmission before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort study of all hospitalized patients with cirrhosis from 2018 to 2022. Time periods within the COVID-19 pandemic were defined using reference data from the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control. Adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression were used to assess differences between periods. RESULTS: 33,926 unique hospitalizations were identified. Most patients were over age 60 years across all time periods of the pandemic. More Hispanic patients were hospitalized during COVID-19 than before COVID-19. Medicare and Medicaid are utilized less frequently during COVID-19 than before COVID-19. After controlling for age and gender, inpatient mortality was significantly higher during all COVID-19 periods except Omicron compared to before COVID-19. The odds of experiencing a 30-day readmission were 1.2 times higher in the pre-vaccination period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSION: Inpatient mortality among patients with cirrhosis has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before COVID-19. Although COVID-19 infection may have had a small direct pathologic effect on the natural history of cirrhotic liver disease, it is more likely that other factors are impacting this population.

Prevalence and Impact of Poorly Controlled Modifiable Risk Factors Among Patients Who Underwent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Managing atrial fibrillation (AF) risk factors (RFs) improves ablation outcomes in obese patients. However, real-world data, including nonobese patients, are limited. This study examined the modifiable RFs of consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation at a tertiary care hospital from 2012 to 2019. The prespecified RFs included body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2, >5% fluctuation in BMI, obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure noncompliance, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, tobacco use, alcohol use higher than the standard recommendation, and a diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) >1.5 years. The primary outcome was a composite of arrhythmia recurrence, cardiovascular admissions, and cardiovascular death. In this study, a high prevalence of preablation modifiable RFs was observed. More than 50% of the 724 study patients had uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, a BMI ≥30 mg/m2, a fluctuating BMI >5%, or a delayed DAT. During a median follow-up of 2.6 (interquartile range 1.4 to 4.6) years, 467 patients (64.5%) met the primary outcome. Independent RFs were a fluctuation in BMI >5% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, p = 0.008), diabetes with A1c ≥6.5% (HR 1.50, p = 0.014), and uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (HR 1.30, p = 0.005). A total of 264 patients (36.46%) had at least 2 of these predictive RFs, which was associated with a higher incidence of the primary outcome. Delayed DAT over 1.5 years did not alter the ablation outcome. In conclusion, substantial portions of patients who underwent AF ablation have potentially modifiable RFs that were not well controlled. Fluctuating BMI, diabetes with hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%, and uncontrolled hyperlipidemia portend an increased risk of recurrent arrhythmia, cardiovascular hospitalizations, and mortality after ablation.

Current status of liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common liver cancer with a median survival of 12-24 mo without treatment. It is further classified based on its location into intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, but up to 70% of these tumors are inoperable at the time of diagnosis. CCA was previously an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation (LT) due to poor outcomes primary due to early recurrent disease. However, improvement in patient selection criteria and neoadjuvant treatment protocols have improved outcomes for inoperable pCCA patients with recent studies reporting LT may improve survival in iCCA. Future advances in the treatment of CCA should include refining patient selection criteria and organ allocation for all subtypes of CCA, determining effective immunotherapies and the evolving role of personalized medicine in patients ineligible for surgical resection or LT. Our article reviews the current status of LT in CCA, along with future directions in managing patients with CCA.

Relationship Between Etiology of Cirrhosis and Survival Among Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Units.

OBJECTIVE: To determine short-term outcomes of patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis (ALC) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with other etiologies of liver disease. In addition, we investigate whether quick sequential organ failure assessment accurately predicts presence of sepsis and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with various etiologies of cirrhosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 1174 consecutive patients with cirrhosis admitted to the ICU between January of 2006 and December of 2015 was analyzed. Outcomes of interest included survival rates within the ICU, post-ICU in-hospital, or at 30 days post-ICU discharge. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-eight patients were found to have ALC with 596 in the non-ALC group. There was no significant difference in ICU mortality rates in ALC versus non-ALC cohorts (10.2% vs 11.7%, P=.40). However, patients with ALC had significantly higher post-ICU in-hospital death (10.0% vs 6.5%, P=.04) as well as higher mortality at 30-day post-ICU discharge (18.7% vs 11.2%, P<.001). Sustained alcohol abstinence did not offer survival advantage over nonabstinence. The predictive power for quick sequential organ failure assessment for sepsis and in-hospital mortality for patients with cirrhosis was limited. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with ALC have decreased survival after ICU discharge compared with patients with other etiologies of cirrhosis, independent of alcohol abstinence.

Treatment-related toxicity and improved outcome from immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: Evidence from an FDA pooled analysis of landmark clinical trials with validation from routine practice.

PURPOSE: The development of treatment-related adverse events (trAE) correlates favorably with clinical outcomes in multiple studies of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); however, this relationship is undefined in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We derived a cohort of 406 patients with unresectable/advanced HCC receiving ICI therapy as part of international clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in support of marketing applications. We tested whether the development of clinically significant trAE (i.e. graded ≥2, trAE2) predicted improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) following ICI. We established an international consortium of 10 tertiary-care referral centres located in Europe (n = 67), United States (US, n = 248) and Asia (n = 42) to validate this association. RESULTS: In the FDA dataset of 406 patients, 325 (80%) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C HCC mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 258, 64%), trAE2 were reported in 228 patients (56.1%). Development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (16.7 versus 11.2 months) and PFS (5.5 versus 2.2 months) and persisted as an independent predictor of outcome after adjusting for viral aetiology, gender, Child-Pugh class, BCLC stage, AFP levels, ECOG-PS, ICI regimen (mono/combination therapy) and receipt of corticosteroid therapy. In a multi-institutional cohort of 357 patients with similar characteristics mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 304, 85%), the development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (23.3 versus 12.1 months) and PFS (9.6 versus 3.9 months). TrAE2 were confirmed predictors of improved OS (HR 0.43; 95% CI:0.25-0.75) and PFS (HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), with multivariable analyses confirming their association with outcome independent of clinicopathologic features of interest. Additional time-varying multivariable analyses also indicated that trAEs were associated with a decreased risk of progression (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.67) in the FDA dataset and death (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.95) in the multi-institutional dataset. CONCLUSION: Development of trAE2 correlates with improved outcomes in patients with HCC receiving ICI in clinical trials and in routine practice. Prospective studies aimed at understanding the underlying immunologic foundations of such relationships are warranted to identify predictive biomarkers of toxicity and response.

Risk Prediction of Nosocomial and Posthospital Discharge Infections in Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AAH) is a severe form of liver injury with mortality as high as 30%-40% at 90 days. As a result of altered immune function in AAH, bacterial infections are common and are associated with poor outcomes. However, determining the risk and subsequent development of infection in patients with AAH remain challenging. We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of AAH at two independent tertiary centers from 1998 to 2018 (test cohort, n = 286) who developed infections following hospitalization. The diagnosis of AAH was confirmed by manual chart review according to the recent National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism definition. Infections were categorized by location and time of diagnosis as hospital-acquired infection (48 hours after admission until discharge) and posthospital infections (up to 6 months following discharge). The cohort was 66% men, and the median age was 48 (21-83) years. Corticosteroids were used in 32% of all patients with AAH. The overall infection rate was 24%. Of those with infections, 46% were hospital acquired and 54% were acquired after hospitalization. Variables found to be significant risk factors for bacterial infection included the presence of ascites on admission (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06), corticosteroid administration (HR, 1.70), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) >23 (HR, 2.61), and white blood cell (WBC) count on admission per point (HR, 1.02). Conclusion: In this multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized with AAH, MELD score, ascites, WBC count, and use of corticosteroids were identified as significant predictors of the development of bacterial infection. We created a novel predictive equation that may be used to aid in the identification of patients with AAH at high risk of infection.

Evaluation of Charcot Triad, Reynolds Pentad, and Tokyo Guidelines for Diagnosis of Cholangitis Secondary to Choledocholithiasis Across Patient Age Groups.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of Charcot triad, Reynolds pentad, and Tokyo Guidelines criteria and clinical outcomes among patients with cholangitis across different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 257 consecutive hospitalized adult patients with acute cholangitis due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-confirmed choledocholithiasis between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: less than 65 years, 65 to 79 years, and 80 years or older. Symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory data on admission were collected. Outcomes included length of hospitalization, intensive care unit stay, and 3-month mortality. Nominal variables were tested with the Pearson χ2 test, and continuous variables were tested with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Charcot triad decreased with older ages. In the group that was age 80 years or older, malaise was the most common symptom; 33.6% (37 of 110) presented with altered sensorium, 9.1% (10 of 110) had no pain, fever, or jaundice, and positive blood culture results were more frequent. Tokyo cholestasis criterion was present in 96.0% (247 of 257), while inflammation (considered essential for diagnosis) was present in 75.9% (195 of 257). Patients 80 years or older had significantly higher mean length of hospital stay (P<.001) and mean length of intensive care unit stay (P=.021). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients in younger age groups, patients with cholangitis who are 80 years or older are less likely to have Charcot triad, are more likely to have features of Reynolds pentad, or present with unexplained malaise. Within the Tokyo Guidelines, cholestasis should replace inflammation as an essential diagnostic criterion.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States: Evolution of Frequency, Outcomes, Center Volumes, and Factors Associated With Outcomes.

Recent modifications in organ allocation policies and increases in chronic liver diseases may have resulted in important changes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States. We examined the trends, outcomes, and factors associated with outcomes in adult LDLT. United Network for Organ Sharing data on 2566 adult LDLT recipients who received transplants from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2019, were analyzed. LDLT graft and patient survival rates were compared with propensity score-matched deceased donor liver transplantation recipients by the Kaplan-Meier curve estimator. The association between preceding LDLT frequency and subsequent outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazards mixed effects modeling. After a stable annual frequency of LDLTs from 2010 to 2014 (~200 per year), the number of LDLTs doubled to 440 in 2019. The 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates for LDLT recipients were 88.4% and 78.1%, respectively, compared with 92.5% and 80.7% in the propensity score-matched donation after brain death recipients (P = 0.005), respectively. Older donor age and recipient diabetes mellitus and life support requirement were significantly associated with graft failure among LDLT recipients (P values <0.05). Average preceding LDLT frequencies of <3 per year, 3 to 20 per year, and >20 per year resulted in 1-year graft survival rates of 82%, 88% to 89%, and 93%, respectively (P values <0.05). There were 3 living donor deaths (0.12%). The frequency of LDLTs has doubled during the past decade, with good outcomes and acceptable donor safety profiles. However, there appear to be varying threshold transplant frequencies (volume/unit time) associated with acceptable (88%-89%) and aspirational (93%) 1-year graft survival rates. These data should be reassuring and encourage LDLT practice as efforts continue to expand the donor pool.

Simultaneous Heart-Liver Transplantation for Congenital Heart Disease in the United States: Rapidly Increasing With Acceptable Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are more adults than children living with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the United States, with a growing proportion requiring heart-liver transplantation (HLT). Our aim was to ascertain the frequency, outcomes, and prognostic factors in this patient population. APPROACH AND RESULTS: United Network for Organ Sharing data on adult patients who underwent heart transplantation (HT) from 2009 through March 2020 were analyzed. The primary study outcome was patient survival. Cox proportional-hazards modeling assessed for mortality associations. There were 1,084 HT recipients: 817 (75.4%) CHD HTs only, 74 (6.8%) CHD HLTs, 179 (16.5%) non-CHD HLTs, and 14 (1.3%) heart-liver-kidney transplants. The number of CHD HLTs increased from a prior rate of 4/year to 21/year in 2019. Among patients with CHD, the 5-year survival rates were 74.1% and 73.6% in HTs only and HLTs, respectively (P = 0.865). There was a higher rate of allograft failure attributable to rejection in CHD HTs only compared with CHD HLTs (3.2% versus 0.4%; P = 0.014). Only 25 out of 115 HT-performing hospitals undertook CHD HLTs. Higher-volume centers (averaging one CHD HLT per year) had a 5-year patient survival rate of 83.0% compared with 61.3% in lower-volume centers (P = 0.079). Among HLT recipients, total bilirubin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.12) and diabetes (HR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.21-7.31) were independently associated with increased mortality risk, whereas CHD and age were not. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HLT for adult CHD in the United States is rising dramatically. The survival outcomes between CHD HT only and CHD HLT groups are comparable; however, the HLT group had lower rates of acute rejection. Among HLT recipients, diabetes and elevated bilirubin are associated with increased posttransplant mortality risk. An average of one CHD HLT per year could be considered a minimum quality metric at transplant centers.

A Cohort Study Examining the Interaction of Alcohol Consumption and Obesity in Hepatic Steatosis and Mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To study the interaction of alcohol consumption with body mass index (BMI) in the development of hepatic steatosis and mortality. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 18,506 participants without fatty liver disease or cirrhosis at enrollment in the Mayo Clinic Biobank from April 9, 2009, through March 31, 2016. Participants were classified by self-reported alcohol consumption status (nondrinkers, moderate drinkers [0 to 2 drinks per day], and heavy drinkers [>2 drinks per day]). The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of hepatic steatosis, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code and confirmed with imaging. The secondary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis determined the impact of alcohol consumption stratified by BMI on outcomes compared with nondrinkers. RESULTS: The cohort (mean ± SD age, 55.8±16.9 years; 63.8% female; mean ± SD BMI, 28.8±6.1 kg/m2) of 18,506 participants included 3657 (19.8%) nondrinkers, 14,236 (76.9%) moderate drinkers, and 613 (3.3%) heavy drinkers at enrollment. After a median follow-up of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 3.8 to 7.2 years), 684 participants had development of hepatic steatosis and 968 died. In moderate drinkers, the risk of hepatic steatosis development was high in the obese group (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.67), insignificant in the overweight group (AHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.26), and decreased in the normal-BMI group (AHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.90). Heavy drinkers had an increased risk of hepatic steatosis irrespective of BMI. Moderate alcohol use was associated with decreased mortality in the normal-weight (AHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58) and overweight (AHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.88) groups but not in the obese group (AHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: In obese individuals, even moderate alcohol use is associated with the development of hepatic steatosis. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with lower mortality in normal-BMI and overweight individuals but not in those who are obese.

Gastrointestinal and liver manifestations of COVID-19.

The novel coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. While patients typically present with fever and symptoms of a respiratory illness, patients have also presented with gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In addition, some patients were reported to have liver injury. In this article, we review gastrointestinal and liver aspects of COVID-19. In addition, we provide general gastroenterologists with guidance on the management of patients with gastrointestinal and liver disorders from COVID-19.

Cardiac safety of off-label COVID-19 drug therapy: a review and proposed monitoring protocol.

More than 2,000,000 individuals worldwide have had coronavirus 2019 disease infection (COVID-19), yet there is no effective medical therapy. Multiple off-label and investigational drugs, such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, have gained broad interest due to positive pre-clinical data and are currently used for treatment of COVID-19. However, some of these medications have potential cardiac adverse effects. This is important because up to one-third of patients with COVID-19 have cardiac injury, which can further increase the risk of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias. Adverse effects of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine on cardiac function and conduction are broad and can be fatal. Both drugs have an anti-arrhythmic property and are proarrhythmic. The American Heart Association has listed chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as agents which can cause direct myocardial toxicity. Similarly, other investigational drugs such as favipiravir and lopinavir/ritonavir can prolong QT interval and cause Torsade de Pointes. Many antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19, for instance azithromycin, can also prolong QT interval. This review summarizes evidenced-based data regarding potential cardiac adverse effects due to off-label and investigational drugs including chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, antiviral therapy, monoclonal antibodies, as well as common antibiotics used for the treatment of COVID-19. The article focuses on practical points and offers a point-of-care protocol for providers who are taking care of patients with COVID-19 in an inpatient and outpatient setting. The proposed protocol is taking into consideration that resources during the pandemic are limited.

Hepatotoxicity From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Management Recommendation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules. ICIs are an immunotherapy for the treatment of many advanced malignancies. The advent of ICIs has been a major breakthrough in the field of oncology, a fact recognized by the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine being awarded for the discovery. The Food and Drug Administration approved the first ICI, ipilimumab, in 2011 for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Seven ICIs are now used in clinical practice, including nivolumab and pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ICIs are increasingly used across the spectrum of hepatobiliary neoplasia. The utility of ICI therapy has been limited by immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) affecting multiple organ systems. Hepatotoxicity is an important irAE, occurring in up to 16% of patients receiving ICIs. Optimizing outcomes in patients receiving ICI therapy requires awareness of and familiarity with diagnosing and management of ICI-induced immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH), including approaches to treatment and ICI dose management. The aim of this review article is to (1) provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of IMH; (2) perform a systematic review of the management of IMH; and (3) present algorithms for the diagnosis and management of IMH.