ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy with a ceiling-mounted flat panel detector in plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 2R3C1.2) with volar locking plate systems to conventional 2D fluoroscopy for detection of insufficient fracture reduction, plate misplacement and protruding screws. METHODS: Using a common volar approach on 12 cadaver forearms, total intraarticular distal radius fractures were induced, manually reduced and internally fixated with a 2.4 distal radius locking compression plate. 2D (anterior-posterior and lateral) and 3D (rotational) fluoroscopic images were taken as well as computed tomographies. Fluoroscopic images, Cone Beam CT (CBCT), 360° rotating sequences (so called "Movies") and CT scans were co-evaluated by a specialist orthopedic surgeon and a specialist radiologist regarding quality of fracture reduction, position of plate, position of the three distal locking screws and position of the three diaphyseal screws. In reference to gold standard CT, sensitivity and specifity were analyzed. RESULTS: "Movie" showed highest sensitivity for detection of insufficient fracture reduction (88%). Sensitivity for detection of incorrect position of plate was 100% for CBCT and 90% for "Movie." For intraarticular position of screws, 2D fluoroscopy and CBCT showed highest sensitivity and specifity (100 and 91%, respectively). Regarding detection of only marginal intraarticular position of screws, sensitivity and specifity of 2D fluoroscopy reached 100% (CBCT: 100 and 83%). "Movie" showed highest sensitivity for detection of overlapping position of screws (100%). When it comes to specifity, CBCT achieved 100%. Regarding detection of only marginal overlapping position of screws, 2D fluoroscopy and "Movie" showed highest sensitivity (100%). CBCT achieved highest specifity (100%). CONCLUSION: As for assessment of quality of fracture reduction and detection of incorrect position of plate as well as overlapping position of the three diaphyseal screws CBCT and "Movie" are comparable to CT - especially when combined. Particularly sensitivity is high compared to standard 2D fluoroscopy.
Subject(s)
Radius Fractures , Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Fluoroscopy , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Robot assisted procedures have evolved during the last years, today many surgical, units perform laparoscopic procedures with DaVinci on a regular Basis. The major advantages of Robot assisted procedures comprise technical factors and improved visualization. In Spinal surgery endoscopic stabilization of fractures has become a Standard for many. PURPOSE: We have employed DaVinci as an access tool for a retroperitoneal lumbar approach followed by a DaVinci assisted corpectomy and cage implantation to treat a fracture of L3. STUDY DESIGN: A single operation as proof of concept and demonstration of the method was performed. METHODS: The whole procedure was video recorded. Time factors and clinical outcome were documented. RESULTS: The procedure was performed safely with no complications. The operating time was longer than usual but within reasonable limits. The postoperatrive outcome did not differ from the usual procedure. The visualization of critical structure during preparation of the vertebral body was superior along with superior soft tissue management with DaVinci. CONCLUSION: An endoscopic robotic instrument can be used for endoscopic access surgery. Despite major advantages in visualization and handling of the endoscopic instruments all bone and cartilage preparation must be performed in a traditional endoscpic way because no appropriate instruments are available at present. In order to perform full robotic assisted procedures, new instruments need to be developed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For some years now, more and more hospitals in Germany have acquired so-called hybrid operating rooms. In these operating rooms it is possible to produce three-dimensional imaging during the operation. Originally developed for cardiovascular surgery, these rooms are increasingly being used for interdisciplinary purposes. Previous experiences in the use for trauma surgery and orthopedics has shown that three-dimensional imaging can have a positive effect on the success of surgery. OBJECTIVE: Can minimally invasive operations on the spine benefit intraoperatively from three-dimensional imaging with respect to operating times and results? METHODS: Minimally invasive operations on the spine performed at the UKSH Campus Kiel between 2015 and 2018 in the hybrid operating room were considered. These were compared to minimally invasive spinal surgery performed in conventional operating rooms. RESULTS: As is usual with the establishment of a new procedure, there are initially longer operating times. With regular use and appropriate training and experience of the personnel, the processes can be optimized. CONCLUSION: Due to the accuracy of the three-dimensional imaging, errors can be detected and eliminated at an early stage during the operation. Revisions are less frequent. In contrast, there is increased radiation exposure and sometimes longer operation and anesthesia times.
Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Orthopedic Procedures , Orthopedics , Radiation Exposure , Germany , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly used in spine surgery. The purpose of navigation systems is to guide the surgeon and to reduce intraoperative x-ray exposure. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and clinical accuracy of a navigation technology based on augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation compared with standard fluoroscopy-guided minimally invasive technique. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cadaveric laboratory study. METHODS: ARSN was installed in a hybrid operating room, consisting of a flat panel detector c-arm with two dimensional/three dimensional imaging capabilities and four integrated cameras in its frame. The surface-referenced navigation device does not require a bony reference but uses video cameras and optical markers applied to the patient's skin for tracking. In four cadavers, a total of 136 pedicle screws were inserted in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The accuracy was assessed by three independent raters in postoperative conventional computed tomography. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of ARSN was 94% compared with an accuracy of 88% for fluoroscopy. The difference was not statistically significant. In the thoracic region, accuracy with ARSN was 92% compared with 83% with fluoroscopy. With fluoroscopy, unsafe screws were observed in three normal cadavers and one with scoliosis. Using ARSN, unsafe screws were only observed in the scoliotic spine. No significant difference in the median of time for K-wire placement was recorded. As no intraoperative fluoroscopy was necessary in ARSN, the performing surgeon was not exposed to radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In this limited cadaveric study minimally invasive screw placement using ARSN was demonstrated to be feasible and as accurate as fluoroscopy. It did not require any additional navigation time or use of any intraoperative x-ray imaging, thereby potentially permitting surgery in a protective lead garment-free environment. A well-powered clinical study is needed to demonstrate a significant difference in the accuracy between the two methods. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: ARSN offers real-time imaging of planned insertion paths, instrument tracking, and overlay of three dimensional bony anatomy and surface topography. The referencing procedure, by optical recognition of several skin markers is easy and does not require a solid bony reference as necessary for conventional navigation which saves time. Additionally, ARSN may foster the reduction of intraoperative x-ray exposure to spinal surgeons.
