Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Drugs in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are becoming a new treatment approach for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the results regarding its efficacy compared with the standard regimen of targeted therapy are not consistent. AIMS: Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of existing studies to reveal the differences in the efficacy and safety of the two systems of treatment. METHODS: The related studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to June 30th, 2022. Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and rate of treatment- related adverse events (TrAEs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled and analyzed by Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: A total of ten high-quality controlled clinical studies with 5,539 patients with uHCC were included. The hazard ratio (HR) of the OS and PFS were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.89), respectively. In addition, the odds ratio (OR) of the ORR and DCR were 3.39 (95% CI, 2.75-4.17) and 1.20 (95% CI, 0.84-1.73), respectively. The ORR of ICIs monotherapy, ICIs plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and ICIs plus ICIs were 16% (95% CI, 0.13-0.18), 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.27), and 20% (95% CI, 0.16-0.24), respectively. For all included studies, the OR of the overall TrAEs was 0.51(95% CI, 0.22-1.18), and grade ≥ 3 TrAEs was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-1.14). CONCLUSION: ICIs were more effective than targeted drugs concerning survival periods and ORR in patients with uHCC while maintaining a stable safety profile.

Comparative effectiveness of several adjuvant therapies after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion.

BACKGROUND: For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), radical hepatectomy is commonly used as a curative treatment. However, postoperative recurrence significantly diminishes the overall survival (OS) of HCC patients, especially with microvascular invasion (MVI) as an independent high-risk factor for recurrence. While some studies suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy may decrease the risk of recurrence following liver resection in HCC patients, the specific role of adjuvant therapies in those with MVI remains unclear. AIM: To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of various adjuvant therapies and determine the optimal adjuvant regimen. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until April 6, 2023. Studies comparing different adjuvant therapies or comparing adjuvant therapy with hepatectomy alone were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were used to combine data on recurrence free survival and OS in both pairwise meta-analyses and NMA. RESULTS: Fourteen eligible trials (2268 patients) reporting five different therapies were included. In terms of reducing the risk of recurrence, radiotherapy (RT) [HR = 0.34 (0.23, 0.5); surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 97.7%] was found to be the most effective adjuvant therapy, followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy [HR = 0.52 (0.35, 0.76); SUCRA = 65.1%]. Regarding OS improvement, RT [HR: 0.35 (0.2, 0.61); SUCRA = 93.1%] demonstrated the highest effectiveness, followed by sorafenib [HR = 0.48 (0.32, 0.69); SUCRA = 70.9%]. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy following hepatectomy may reduce the risk of recurrence and provide a survival benefit for HCC patients with MVI. RT appears to be the most effective adjuvant regimen.

Long term prophylactic anticoagulation for portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulants for the prevention of portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) in patients with cirrhosis after splenectomy and explore the optimal time of anticoagulant administration. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM)databases, so as to screen out studies comparing the prognoses between cirrhotic post-splenectomy patients treated with and without anticoagulants. The parameters that were analyzed included the incidence of PVST and postoperative bleeding. RESULTS: With a total of 592 subjects, we included 8 studies (6 observational and 2 randomized trials) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that the incidence of PVST was significantly lower in the anticoagulation group during the first 6 months of anticoagulant administration. And the largest difference in the incidence of PVST between the anticoagulation and control groups was observed at 3 months (odds ratio 0.17(0.11~0.27); P = 0.767; I2 = 0.0%) and 6 months (OR = 0.21(0.11~0.40); P = 0.714; I2 = 0.0%) postoperatively. The incidence of bleeding was not significantly higher in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio 0.71 (0.30~1.71); P = 0.580; I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSION: Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin can decrease the incidence of PVST in post-splenectomy cirrhotic patients without an increased risk of bleeding. And the optimal use time of warfarin is 6 months after splenectomy.

The effect of neutrophil extracellular traps in venous thrombosis.

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as special release products of neutrophils have received extensive attention. They are composed of decondensed chromatin and coated with nucleoproteins, including histones and some granulosa proteins. NETs can form a network structure to effectively capture and eliminate pathogens and prevent their spread. Not only that, recent studies have shown that NETs also play an important role in venous thrombosis. This review provides the most important updated evidence regarding the mechanism of NETs formation and the role of NETs in the process of venous thrombosis. The potential prophylactic and therapeutic value of NETs in venous thrombotic disease will also be discussed.

Clinical value of AKR1B10 in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical value of Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) in the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A search of the PubMed, China Biology Medicine, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed to conduct meta-analyses to evaluate the accuracy of AKR1B10 in diagnosing HCC and to assess the impact on prognosis of patients after curative resection of HCC. RESULTS: A total of 12 different cohorts from 11 studies including 2747 HCC patients and 2053 controls showed that the pooled specificity and the pooled sensitivity of AKR1B10 for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of serum AKR1B10 for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.93), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 in malignant tumor tissue for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69-0.90), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 to distinguish HCC from benign liver disease were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 combined with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 in malignant tumor tissue for the diagnosis of early-stage HCC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.62-0.95) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), respectively. A meta-analysis of five studies including 798 patients demonstrated that high AKR1B10 expression in liver malignant tumor was associated with better overall survival in patients with HCC after hepatectomy (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.72, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AKR1B10 exhibits a great clinical value in the diagnosis of HCC, especially for early-stage HCC, with excellent diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, AKR1B10 expression can predict the prognosis of HCC patients after hepatic resection.

Successful conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is getting closer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Conversion therapy provides selected patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma the opportunity to undergo a curative hepatectomy and achieve long-term survival. Although various regimens have been used for conversion therapy, their conversion rate and safety remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted some meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several conversion regimens in order to elucidate the optimal regimen. Method: We performed systematic literature research on PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science until July 30, 2022. Chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), molecular therapy (targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both), and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were the conversion regimens we targeted. Results: Twenty-four studies were included. The pooled conversion rates for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-20%; I² = 82%), 12% (95% CI, 9%-15%; I² = 60%), 10% (95% CI, 3%-20%; I² = 90%), and 25% (95% CI, 13%-38%; I² = 89%), respectively. The pooled objective response rates (ORR) for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 19% (95% CI, 12%-28%; I² = 77%), 32% (95% CI, 15%-51%; I² = 88%), 30% (95% CI, 15%-46%; I² = 93%), and 60% (95% CI, 41%-77%; I² = 91%), respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 AEs for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 67% (95% CI, 55%-78%; I² = 79%), 34% (95% CI, 8%-66%; I²= 92%), 30% (95% CI, 18%-43%; I² = 84%), and 40% (95% CI, 23%-58%; I² = 89%), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed the conversion rate, ORR and grade ≥3 AE rate for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and locoregional therapy (LRT) were 33% (95% CI, 17%-52%; I² = 89%), 73% (95% CI, 51%-91%; I² = 90%), 31% (95% CI, 10%-57%; I² = 89%), respectively. Conclusion: Combined locoregional-systemic therapy, especially TKI combined with ICI and LRT, may be the most effective conversion therapy regimen, associated with a significant ORR, conversion potential, and an acceptable safety profile.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial. Methods: We compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08-0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06-0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81-0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42-0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26-0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00-0.07). Conclusion: TACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC.