Survival of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab and FOLFOX4.

Purpose: In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) a long term survival and a probability of cure might be achieved with the surgical treatment of metastatic sites after prior application of systemic treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival of patients with unresectable CLM treated with bevacizumab (bev) and FOLFOX4 (FOLFOX-bev) and to compare survival according to patient, disease and treatment characteristics. Methods: This research included 110 patients with unresectable CLM treated with FOLFOX-bev. Treatment response and resectability were estimated every 3 months. If resectability was achieved, patients were operated on and followed. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics in patients with and without hepatectomy were compared. Survival was estimated according to Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of survival according to patient, disease and treatment characteristics was performed using log-rank test. Results: In patients with hepatectomy, treatment response was significantly more frequent (63, 63% vs 16, 66%, p<0.001). One- and three-year survival rate for the whole group was 87, 3% and 36, 1%, respectively; median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (95%CI 19, 63-28, 26). One- and three-year survival for patients with hepatectomy was 98, 48%, and 54, 76%, respectively; median OS was 35 months (95%CI 28, 83-41, 17). Three-year survival was significantly better in patients with hepatectomy (HR=3.775; 95%CI 2.150-6.627, p<0.001), older than 60 years (p=0.033), those without extrahepatic metastases (p=0.008) and those with treatment response (p=0.05). Conclusion: Significantly better survival had patients with hepatectomy, treatment response, older than 60 years and without extrahepatic metastases. FOLFOX4-bev is effective treatment for molecularly unselected patients.

Current and future targets and therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite early diagnosis and treatment improvement, the majority of patients will still suffer from metastatic disease (mCRC), which has a poor prognosis. Molecular diversity of CRC requires personalized targeted approach for improving patient outcomes. Antiangiogenic agents proved to be beneficial in the continuum of mCRC treatment. For efficient epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) directed therapy, subtle molecular selection and better strategies to overcome resistance are needed. BRAF mutant and HER-2 positive mCRC will soon be provided with approved targeted treatments and check-point inhibitors demonstrated effectiveness in microsatellite instability (MSI) - high mCRC. Moreover, numeorous promising agents are entering clinical trial arena. This review summarizes actual and possible targets and current and promising agents for mCRC treatment. With broader accessibility of liquid biopsy we could track molecular evolution of CRC and target genetic alterations as they emerge.

Do we really know how to overcome trastuzumab resistance in hormone sensitive metastatic breast cancer?

PURPOSE: This article focuses on how the status of hormone receptors (HR) influences the efficacy of trastuzumab in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with first-line trastuzumab in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out at the Clinic for Oncology, Clinical Centre in Nis, from January 2015 to until June 2018. A total of 121 patients were treated with first-line trastuzumab in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy. None of the patients from the HR-positive group received hormonotherapy after completion of chemotherapy with trastuzumab. RESULTS: Clinical benefit rate was present in 76% of the patients, including partial response (PR) in 37%, stable disease (SD) in 38%, and complete response (CR) in almost 8% of the patients. Progressive disease (PD) occurred in almost a quarter of the patients, i.e. 24%. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the entire group of patients amounted to 9 months, whereas overall survival (OS) was 30 months. PFS in the HR-negative tumor group was significantly longer (13 months) compared to 8 months in the HR-positive tumor group (p<0.0001; HR 0.49;95% CI 0.31-0.69). Furthermore, OS was significantly longer in the HR-negative tumor group (34 months), compared to 26 months in the HR-positive tumor group (p=0.0073, HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.36-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate a different response to anti-HER2 therapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to HR status, thus emphasizing that ER most likely represents an escape pathway for the response to anti-HER2 target therapy and vice versa. Combining hormonotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy surely represents a promising strategy which could help overcome resistance to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 agents.

Synchronous mantle cell lymphoma and prostate adenocarcinoma-is it just a coincidence?

Introduction: Synchronous occurrence of lymphomas and other cancers, mostly carcinomas are well established. The most of cases describe chronic lymphocytic leukemia as the leading lymphoproliferative disease with the tendency towards secondary malignancies development. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been described in only 2 cases to co-occur with prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC). There are scarce data about the connection between MCL and urology cancers. We presented the first case of synchronous occurrence of MCL and PAC in the same patient in Serbia. Case report: A 64-year-old male initially presented with fatigue, splenomegaly, and bicytopenia. The bone marrow biopsy specimen revealed extensive infiltration with MCL. During lymphoma staging procedure prostate enlargement (57 mm) was accidentally found by multislice- computed tomography (MSCT). The serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was elevated (52 ng/mL; normal values ≤ 4 ng/mL). Transrectal ultrasound biopsy revealed PAC. High Gleason score determined high-risk locally advanced PAC. The patient underwent treatment with chemotherapy and hormone therapy due to the existence of double malignancies. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) was applied for MCL, and luteinizing hormonereleasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, triptorelin, for PAC. Partial response was obtained for MCL, and stable disease for PAC. In a 1.5-year observation period the patient was still disease progression free for both of malignancies. Conclusion: This case points aut that elderly males are in need for careful observation during the staging procedure for lymphoma. The literature data suggest that MCL patients are in increased risk for urologic malignancies development. However, the etiologic connection between these two entities, except male gender and older age, remains unclear.

Clinicopathological characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in Serbia--the Melanoma Focus Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment options for metastatic melanoma in Serbia are limited due to the lack of newly approved biologic agents and the lack of clinical studies. Also, there is a paucity of data regarding the treatment approaches in different tertiary centers and efficacy of available chemotherapy protocols. The aim of this study was to obtain more detailed data about treatment protocols in Serbia based on structured survey in tertiary oncology centers. METHODS: Data about the melanoma patients treated in 2011 were analyzed from hospital databases in 6 referent oncology centers in Serbia, based on the structured survey, with the focus on metastatic melanoma patients (unresectable stage IIIC and IV). RESULTS: A total of 986 (79-315 in different centers) patients were treated, with 320 (32.45%) newly diagnosed patients. There were 317 patients in stage IIIC/IV, 77/317 aged < 50 years. At the time of diagnosis 47.3% of patients were < 60 years of age (24.2% < 40 years, 23% 50-59 years, 52.6% > 60 years). At initial diagnosis 12.5% of patients were in stage III and 4.5% in stage IV. The most common type was superficial spreading melanoma (50-660), followed by nodular melanoma (23.5-50%). Apart from the regional and distant lymph node metastases, the most frequent organs involved in stage IV disease were distant skin and soft tissues (12-55%), lungs (19-55.5%), liver (10-60%), and bones (3-10%). The first line therapy in stage IV metastatic melanoma was dacarbazine (DTIC) dimethyl-triazenoimidozole-carboxamide in 61-93% of the patients, while the second line varied between the centers. Disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was achieved in 25.7% of the patients treated with the first line chemotherapy and 23.1% of the patients treated with the second line therapy, but the duration of response was short, in first-line therapy 6.66 +/- 3.36 months (median 6.75 months). More than 90% of patients were treated outside the clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Based on this survey, there is a large unmet need for the new treatment options for metastatic melanoma in Serbia. The development of national guidelines, and greater involvement in international clinical studies could lead to widening of treatment options for this chemotherapy resistant disease.

Stressful life events and breast cancer risk: a hospital-based case-control study.

PURPOSE: Elucidation of the factors contributing to the incidence of breast cancer is of crucial importance for the development of preventive or therapeutic strategies targeting the disease. Research on stress and breast cancer has been documented by various studies published over the years. In view of breast cancer importance as the most commonly occurring malignancy in females in Serbia, this study was undertaken to examine the association between stressful life events and breast cancer risk. METHODS: The present hospital-based case-control study comprised 120 new breast cancer cases and 120 hospital controls matched with respect to age (± 2 years). This study used the Paykel Life Events Scale to obtain information about stressful life events in the years before diagnosis. The SPSS statistical package was used and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated from multivariate conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: Multiple conditional logistic regression analysis revealed six independent predictors of breast cancer risk: experience of severe and moderate threats (first 25 life events from the scale) (OR=3.15, 95% CI=2.01-4.93), son's military service (OR=6.09, 95% CI=4.17-12.37), death of close family member (OR=7.98, 95% CI=2.18-9.14), moderate financial difficulties (OR=3.26, 95%CI=1.24-8.56), maternal death in childhood (OR=3.46, 95% CI=1.21-9.92) and serious financial difficulties (OR=3.55, 95% CI=1.20-10.52). CONCLUSION: Stress exposure has been proposed to contribute to the etiology of breast cancer. There is a need for understanding the differing physiological effects of types or times of stress exposure.

Mantle cell lymphoma-current literature overview.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of lymphoma identified as a particular entity in the early 1990s. The prognosis of MCL is generally poor, and is considered one of the worst among all B-cell lymphomas. In general, conventional chemotherapy is only palliative and the median duration of remissions is only 1-2 years. With the exception of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), current treatment approaches are not curative and the corresponding survival curve is characterized by a relatively steep and continuous decline, with a median survival of about 4 years and <15% long-term survivors. Only a small proportion of patients may be exempted from this disappointing picture, because they have an indolent course of the disease and could be handled with watch and wait strategy. Optimal first-line therapy in MCL is not established yet. Very intensive regimens, including autologous (auto-SCT) and allo-SCT, seem to be required to improve the outcome. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only therapy that can achieve a plateau in the survival curve, but, however, it is not applicable in most of the cases due to the patients' older age when the disease mostly occurs. Molecular knowledge of MCL has progressed and therefore a large number of molecular targeted therapies have been introduced in relapsed and refractory disease.

Clinical benefit of cetuximab and prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer: a single institution analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefits of cetuximab (CTX) and the prognostic value of CTX-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. METHODS: Sixty patients were tested for KRAS mutation at the Department of Oncology, Clinical Centre Nis. We assessed 34 wild-type KRAS mCRC patients treated with CTX. All of them were refractory to prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based regimens. The maximum grade skin toxicity according to treatment cycle was analyzed. Skin toxicity was grouped into clinically non-relevant skin toxicity (grade 0-1: Group 1) and clinically relevant skin toxicity (grade 2-4: Group 2). RESULTS: Ten out of 33 patients (30.30%) achieved partial response (PR). Eight additional patients (24.24%) showed stable disease (SD), whereas 15 (45.45%) had disease progression (PD). No patient achieved complete response (CR). Overall response rate (ORR) was 30.30%, whereas the disease control rate (DCR) was 54.54%.The median progression free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks. Some degree of skin toxicity was observed in 79.41% (27/34) of the patients. Clinically non-relevant skin toxicity was observed in 50% (17/34), and clinically relevant in 50 % (17/34) of the patients. Grade 4 skin toxicity was documented in 1 patient. The mean PFS in Group 1 was 12.65±5.59 weeks and in Group 2 22.82±12.16 (p<0.05). The results showed that grade 2-4 skin toxicity was associated with significantly better response to treatment than skin toxicity grade 0-1, with regard to ORR (80.00 vs 20.00%; p<0.05) and DCR ( 66.66 vs 33.33%; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Cetuximab has clinical benefit when given alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-refractory CRC. Skin toxicity was one of the predictors of response and it was in line with what was expected.

Are we a step forward with targeted agents in resolving the enigma of mantle cell lymphoma?

Mantle cell lymphoma has been recognized as a distinct entity from the other non-Hodgkin lymphomas in middle 1990's. It carries a worst prognosis among all mature B-cell malignancies. Cyclin D1 and recently SOX11 are the hallmarks for this disease. Even if it is highly responsive to induction treatment, it remains incurable, since it inevitably relapses. Highly aggressive approaches with stem cell transplantation can shift the survival curve for a bit, but even so the overall survival is not significantly improved in most of the cases. Small portion of patients with this heterogeneous disease have an indolent course with long-term survival. Conventional immunochemotherapy has reached its maximal possibilities, so novel target agents are absolutely warranted. The large number of ongoing early phase trials demonstrated promising results, especially emphasizing agents that target B-cell receptor. They are mostly investigated in relapsed/refractory disease, while front-line approaches with those agents need to be explored in future times.

[Significance of serum tumor markers monitoring metastases in carcinomas of unknown primary site].

BACKGROUND/AIM: Unknown primary tumors represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are indicative of ominous prognosis. Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is defined as the lack of any detectable primary site after full evaluation, and accounts for approximately 3-5% of all newly diagnosed patients with malignancies. The aim of this report was to present the prognostic and predictive value of 8 serum tumor markers in this group of patients. METHODS: The study involved 63 patients. On histological examination, all the patients were presented with metastatic tumors whose primary site (origin) could not be detected with noninvasive diagnostic techniques. Following the routine light microscopy, all histological findings were classified into one of the following three groups: plano-cellular carcinoma--8 patients; adenocarcinoma--33 patients; unclassifiable (undifferentiated) carcinoma--22 patients. In all the cases we evaluated 8 serum tumor markers: alpha-fetoproteins (AFP), chronic gonadotrophin beta submit, human (beta-HCG), neuron specific enolase (NSE), marker of malignant ovarian tumors (CA 125), prostate-specific antigene (PSA), marker of malignant brest tumor (CA 15-3), marker of malignant pancreas tumor and gastrointestinal tumor (Ca 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at the time of diagnosis. The patients on chemotherapy had the markers determined after the third and sixth chemocycle, i.e. at the time of illness progression observation, if present. The patients responding to chemotherapy with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) had the markers determined after three-month periods until the time of relapse or progression. Chemotherapy was applied in 32 patients (20 females and 12 males), aged 29-70 years, who met the inclusion criteria. The following chemotherapy regimen was used: doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (day 1), cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (day 1), and etoposide 120 mg/m2 (days 1-3). The period between two chemotherapy cycles was three weeks, and maximum five weeks in the case of prolonged hematological toxicity. RESULTS: Most commonly elevated were NSE values (82.54%), while AFP values were least commonly elevated (11.11%). Average survival time was 17.89 months (95% CI 12.96; 22.83). The probability of 24 months' survival was 0.228. The group of 32 patients treated with chemotherapy had 12 (37.5%) fatal outcomes in the observed period (72 months). Average survival time was 26.6 months (95% CI 19.5; 33.7). Average tumor marker values before and after the chemotherapy were significantly lower for NSE and CA 125. Survival was significantly better in cases of NSE and CA 125 decrease of more than 20%. CONCLUSION: Increased values of serum tumor markers are very often in CUP. The tumors show nonspecific overexpression of tumor markers. The NSE and CA 125 levels show good correlation with response to the given chemotherapy. However, a routine evaluation of commonly used serum tumor markers has not been proven of any prognostic and predictive assistance.