Short- and long-term survival after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a National database study.

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains controversial. Our objective was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) vs. open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma using a national cancer database. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2010-2014) was analyzed for total gastrectomy cases performed for gastric adenocarcinoma. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were stratified by stage and compared based on laparoscopic vs. open surgical approach. Primary outcome measures included 30-day and 90-day mortality and Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: There were 2584 cases analyzed, including 592 (22.9%) stage I, 710 (27.5%) stage II, and 1282 (49.6%) stage III cases. The distribution of LTG vs. OTG cases was 156 (26.4%) vs. 436 (73.6%) for stage I, 163 (23.0%) vs. 547 (77.0%) for stage II, and 241 (18.8%) vs. 1041 (81.2%) for stage III. For all stages analyzed, there was no difference between laparoscopic vs. open approach for adjusted 30-day mortality (stage I: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.52, p = 0.75; stage II: AOR 1.36, p > 0.99; stage III: AOR 0.46, p = 0.29) or 90-day mortality (stage I: AOR 0.46, p = 0.99; stage II: AOR 1.17, p = 0.99; stage III: 0.57, p = 0.29). There was no difference between LTG vs. OTG 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves for any stage (stage I: p = 0.20; stage II: p = 0.83; stage III: p = 0.46). When compared to OTG, LTG had a similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (HR 0.89 p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy and OTG have comparable 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and long-term survival.

No Reduction in Surgical Site Infection Obtained with Post-Operative Antibiotics in Facial Fractures, Regardless of Duration or Anatomic Location: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: We performed a systematic review of the literature on antibiotic prophylaxis practices in open reduction, and internal fixation of, facial fracture(s) (ORIFfx). We hypothesized that prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) would not decrease the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Methods: We performed a systematic review of four databases: PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBase, and Web of Science, from inception through January 15, 2017. Three independent reviewers extracted fracture location (orbital, mid-face, mandible), antibiotic use, SSI incidence, and time from injury to surgery. Mantel-Haenszel and generalized estimating equations were carried out independently for each fracture zone. Results: Of the 587 articles identified, 54 underwent full-text review, yielding 27 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 studies (n = 2,316 patients) provided data for mandible fractures, four studies (n = 439) for mid-face fractures, and six studies (n = 377) for orbital fractures. Pooled analysis of each fracture type's SSI rate showed no statistically significant association with the odds ratio (OR) of developing an SSI. For mandible fractures treated with ORIFfx, the OR for an SSI after 24-72 hours of prophylaxis relative to <24 hours was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.17), whereas for >72 hours compared with <24 hours, the OR was 1.42 (95% CI) 0.96-2.11). For mid-face fractures, there was no improvement in SSI rate from PAP (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.20-5.63). Conclusions: We did not demonstrate a lower rate of SSI associated with PAP for any ORIFfx repair. Post-operative antibiotics for >72 hours paradoxically may increase the SSI risk after mandible fracture repairs.

The use of computed tomography imaging for abdominal seatbelt sign: A single-center, prospective evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines surrounding abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) were made prior to the use of modern computed tomography (CT) imaging. We sought to prospectively determine whether a negative CT scan is associated with the absence of hollow viscus injury (HVI), and we hypothesized that trauma patients with an abdominal SBS without CT imaging findings would not have a hollow viscus injury (HVI). METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with SBS was compiled over one year. Subjects were divided into those with and without HVI. Covariate distributions were summarized by group. Bivariate tests and logistic regression were used to investigate associations between covariates and HVI. RESULTS: Of 220 patients with SBS, the incidence of HVI was 7% (n = 15). Radiographic findings were strongly associated with HVI and no patients with a negative CT scan had HVI. Free fluid was seen in 80% (12) of patients with HVI, whereas it was found in only 11% (23) without injury. A composite variable for negative CT scan was found to be associated with the absence of HVI: (Fisher's exact 1-tailed p, doubled = 0.014). CONCLUSION: In this study, the incidence of HVI with SBS is lower than previously reported, and no patients with negative CT imaging required an operation for HVI-suggesting there is a population of patients with SBS who could be discharged from the emergency room. A prospective multicenter study is needed to confirm these findings.

Risk Factors for Post-Operative Sepsis and Septic Shock in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.

Background: Sepsis after emergency surgery is associated with a higher mortality rate than elective surgery, and total hospital costs increase by 2.3 times. This study aimed to identify risk factors for post-operative sepsis or septic shock in patients undergoing emergency surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) by identifying patients undergoing emergency surgery between 2012 and 2015 and comparing those who developed post-operative sepsis or septic shock (S/SS) with those who did not. Patients with pre-operative sepsis or septic shock were excluded. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the development of S/SS in patients undergoing non-elective surgery. Results: Of 122,281 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2,399 (2%) developed S/SS. Risk factors for S/SS were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) class 2 or higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19-3.02; p < 0.0001), totally dependent (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.38-2.83; p = 0.00021) or partially dependent (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.35-2.00; p < 0.0001) functional status, and male gender (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.18-1.45; p < 0.0001). Compared with colorectal procedures, patients undergoing pancreatic (OR 2.33, CI 1.40-3.87; p = 0.00108) and small intestine (OR 1.27; CI 1.12-1.44; p = 0.00015) surgery were more likely to develop S/SS. Patients undergoing biliary surgery (OR 0.38; CI 0.30-0.48; p < 0.0001) were less likely to develop S/SS. Conclusions: Risk factors for the development of sepsis or septic shock are ASA PS class 2 or higher, partially or totally dependent functional status, and male gender. Emergency pancreatic or small intestinal procedures may confer a higher risk. Greater vigilance and early post-operative screening may be of benefit in patients with these risk factors.

Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: survival outcomes from the NCDB.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) typically involve small comparative groups and often do not control for tumor size or stage of disease. The objective of this study was to compare adjusted survival outcomes for laparoscopic versus open GIST. METHOD: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010 to 2014 was evaluated for gastric and small intestinal GIST resections. After stratification by disease stage and adjustment for patient demographics, comorbidity score, tumor size, and tumor location, 90-day mortality rates were compared based on laparoscopic versus open resection. Kaplan-Meier estimates of long-term survival were also compared. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) for survival. RESULTS: There were 5096 cases analyzed, including 2910 (57%) stage I, 954 (19%) stage II, and 1232 (24%) stage III cases. The distribution of laparoscopic versus open cases was 1291 (44%) versus 1619 (56%) for stage I, 318 (33%) versus 636 (67%) for stage II, and 286 (23%) versus 946 (77%) for stage III. There was no significant difference in adjusted 90-day mortality between laparoscopic and open resection. Kaplan-Meier estimates of long-term survival demonstrated improved overall survival curves for laparoscopic resection for stage I and stage II disease, but no significant difference for stage III disease. Factors associated with statistically significant higher adjusted overall mortality included older age (HR 1.06; p < 0.001), black race (HR 1.33; p = 0.04), higher comorbidity score (HR 1.47; p < 0.001), and small intestinal versus gastric tumor location (HR 1.28; p = 0.03). The hazards model suggested improved overall survival for females (HR 0.59; p < 0.001) and laparoscopic approach (HR 0.80; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and open GIST resection have comparable 90-day mortality with possible improved long-term survival with laparoscopy for early-stage disease. These findings support the use of laparoscopy as a viable and potentially more effective approach to GIST resection.

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Surgery: Decreased Length of Stay but No Difference in Mortality with Laparoscopic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) surgery mortality ranges 1% to 24%. We hypothesized a decrease in length of stay (LOS) with laparoscopic surgical repair (LSR) compared with open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: Patients undergoing PPU surgery 2005 to 2015 were identified in NSQIP. LSR was compared with OSR 2005 to 2015. LSR 2005 to 2010 was compared with 2011 to 2015. OSR 2005 to 2010 was compared with 2011 to 2015. The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes were mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2015, LSR had a decreased LOS, was more likely to wean from the ventilator, but had no significant difference in mortality compared with OSR. There was no significant difference in mortality for LSR or OSR over time. CONCLUSIONS: When patients are appropriately selected, LSR for PPU is a viable alternative to OSR, decreasing LOS and pulmonary complications. This demonstrates significant benefit to patients and hospital throughput.

A Propensity Score Analysis of Clostridium difficile Infection among Adult Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is now the most common cause of health-care-associated infection and carries a mortality rate ranging from 5-30%. Previously, trauma patients in whom CDI developed were thought to represent a unique younger at-risk population. This study aimed to establish the incidence of CDI among adult trauma patients. We hypothesized that these patients would have increased risk of death, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS compared with trauma patients without CDI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all adult trauma patients admitted for greater than 48 hours to a single Level I trauma center between 2014 and 2016 was conducted. Analysis was performed using 1-to-5 propensity score matching with the aim to analyze the relationship between CDI, death, and other outcome variables. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2016, of 4893 trauma patients admitted for >48 hours, 27 (0.6%) patients received a diagnosis of CDI. These patients had a mean age of 55.6 years, mean injury severity score (ISS) of 22.4, and mortality rate of 9.1%. Of these patients, 22 were able to find appropriate propensity score matches. After adjusting for important covariables, there was no significant difference in death between CDI and non-CDI patients (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-2.57, adjusted p = 0.66). In addition, there was no significant difference in ICU LOS between the two groups (relative mean [RM]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.04-2.33, adjusted p = 0.0971). The CDI patients, however, did have a significantly longer hospital LOS, compared with non-CDI patients (RM = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16-1.66, adjusted p = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: Among trauma patients admitted >48 hours CDI occurred at a rate of 0.6%, much lower than anticipated. Patients in whom CDI developed had a significantly longer hospital LOS however, had no significant difference in odds of mortality or ICU LOS compared to patients without CDI.

How safe is same-day discharge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with low morbidity and mortality and a short length of stay. Studies on the safety of same-day discharge after LSG are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between same-day versus first-postoperative-day (POD1) discharge after LSG. SETTING: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program national database. METHODS: The 2015 to 2016 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed for elective LSG cases with same-day or POD1 discharge. Open, revisional, and converted cases were excluded. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare adjusted 30-day mortality, morbidity, readmission, and reoperation for same-day versus POD1 discharge. RESULTS: We examined 85,321 LSG cases, including 4728 same-day discharges and 80,593 POD1 discharges. Compared with POD1 discharges, same-day discharges were associated with higher overall morbidity (1.31% versus .84%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.72; P = .0002), a higher readmission rate (2.14% versus 1.64%, respectively; AOR 1.40; P = 0.0034), and a higher reoperation rate (.61% versus .27%, respectively; AOR 2.35; P < .0001). There was no difference in mortality (.08% versus .04%, respectively; AOR 2.62; P = .0923). CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after LSG is associated with increased complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared with POD1 discharge. Further studies are needed to examine objective criteria for safe same-day discharge after LSG.

The effect of hospital teaching status on outcomes in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown conflicting effects of resident involvement on outcomes after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Resident involvement may be a proxy for a teaching environment in which multiple factors affect patient outcomes. However, no study has examined outcomes of laparoscopic bariatric surgery based on hospital teaching status. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between teaching hospitals (THs) and nonteaching hospitals (NTHs). SETTING: Retrospective review of a national database in the United States. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011-2013) was reviewed for obese patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG. Patient demographic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed according to hospital teaching status. Primary outcome measures included risk-adjusted inpatient mortality and serious morbidity. RESULTS: We analyzed 32,449 LRYGBs and 26,075 LSGs. There were 35,160 (60.1%) cases performed at THs and 23,364 (39.9%) cases performed at NTHs. At THs, the distribution of LRYGB versus LSG cases was 20,461 (58.2%) versus 14,699 (41.8%), respectively; at NTHs, the distribution was 11,988 (51.3%) versus 11,376 (48.7%), respectively. For LRYGB, there were no significant differences between THs versus NTHs in mortality (AOR 1.14; P = 0.99), but there was an increase in odds of serious morbidity at THs (AOR 1.36; P<0.001). For LSG, there were no significant differences between THs versus NTHs for mortality (AOR 1.15; P = 0.99) or serious morbidity (AOR 1.03; P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between THs and increased serious morbidity for LRYGB, but hospital teaching status has no effect on morbidity or mortality after LSG. Further research is warranted to elucidate the reasons for these associations.