ABSTRACT
Different biomarkers are investigated to detect the causes of severe complications in preterm infants. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are recognized as an important part of cell-to-cell communication, and their increased levels were reported in numerous pathological states. We aimed to increase our knowledge about the incidence of platelet and endothelial EVs in cord blood of preterm newborns using conventional flow cytometry. The presence of platelet (CD36+CD41+), activated platelet (CD41+CD62+), and endothelial (CD31+CD105+) EVs was analyzed. Immune electron microscopy was used to confirm the presence of EVs and the specificity of their labeling. The size of detected extracellular vesicles was in the range 400-2000 nm. The differences in the counts of EVs between the preterm and control group were not significant and no correlation of EVs count with gestation age was recorded. Cord blood plasma samples with free hemoglobin level > 1 mg/mL had more than threefold higher counts of CD36+CD41+ and CD41+CD62+ EVs (p < 0.001), while the count of CD31+CD105+ EVs was only moderately increased (p < 0.05). Further studies utilizing cytometers with improved sensitivity are needed to confirm that the analysis of large platelet and endothelial EVs mirrors the quantitative situation of their whole plasma assemblage.
ABSTRACT
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from liquid biopsies are extensively analyzed by flow cytometry, a technology that is continuously evolving. Thresholding utilizing a violet 405 nm laser side scatter (VSSC) has recently been implemented. Here, we collected set of large EV (lEV) samples from cord blood, which we analyzed using a standard flow cytometer improved via a 405 nm laser side scatter. Samples were analyzed using two distinct thresholding methods-one based on VSSC, and one based on VSSC combined with fluorescence thresholding on stained phosphatidylserine. Through these thresholding methods, we compared lEVs from pre-term births and control cord blood. Double-labeled lEVs with platelet CD36+/CD41+, activated platelet CD41+/CD62P+ and endothelial CD31+/CD105+ antibodies were used. Apart from comparing the two groups together, we also correlated measured lEVs with the thresholding methods. We also correlated the results of this study with data analyzed in our previous study in which we used a conventional 488 nm laser SSC. We did not find any difference between the two cord blood groups. However, we found highly concurrent data via our correlation of the thresholding methods, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.96 even though the numbers of detected lEVs differed between thresholding methods. In conclusion, our approaches to thresholding provided concurrent data and it seems that improving the cytometer with the use of a VSSC increases its sensitivity, despite not being particularly critical to the validity of flow cytometric studies that compare pathological and physiological conditions in liquid biopsies.
