Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Chir Gynaecol ; 89(2): 125-30, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10905679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in open reduction and osteosynthesis of closed hip fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis of these fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 224 patients operated on between November 1994 and February 1998 in six hospitals by internal fixation for a fresh hip fracture were prospectively and randomly allocated to either a ceftriaxone antibiotic prophylaxis or no prophylaxis group and followed for one year. RESULTS: Within 6 weeks after the operation, 2.6% wound infections were recorded in the antibiotic group and 4.7% in the control group. Two (1.9%) of the five infections in the control group were deep infections (both sensitive to ceftriaxone). There were no statistically significant differences between the infection rates in both groups. However, when analyzing all complications recorded within 6 weeks, significantly more complications were found in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis the most important factor predicting postoperative complications was the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: In this study the antibiotic prophylaxis group had significantly less postoperative complications than the control group within 6 weeks after the operation.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Hip Fractures/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Healing , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Finland , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Chir Gynaecol ; 89(1): 20-3, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10791640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant oesophageal obstruction with an advanced disease presents a difficult challenge. A new class of metal stents have been developed to overcome the limitations of existing treatment modalities. METHODS: We present our first 58 patients, who have been treated with self-expandable metallic stents, using sedation anaesthesia, with fluoroscopic and endoscopic control. Both kinds of stents, covered and uncovered, were applied. RESULTS: There was no procedure-related mortality. The immediate relief of dysphagia was 98%. All four oesophageal fistulas were successfully sealed with covered stents. Due to stent migration, tumour overgrowth, or ingrowth, twelve (21%) of the patients needed re-intervention. Restenting or laser therapies were used against recurrent dysphagia. CONCLUSION: The palliation of oesophageal malignant obstruction with metal stents is a rapid, effective, and relatively safe single treatment which can be employed as part of a multimodal treatment program.


Subject(s)
Cardia , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care , Stents , Stomach Neoplasms/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL