The applications of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Heart Failure and beyond.

Abstract: Wearable cardioverter defibrillator has revealed a crucial device both in patients with a clear indication of ICD implantation but with temporary contraindications or in expectation of a diagnosis, considering that its use should be individualized.

The potential impact of acute coronary syndromes on automatic sensing system in Subcutaneous-ICDs.

BACKGROUND: The Subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) is emerging as a suitable option for most ICD candidates, however some open issues regarding the sensing algorithm still remain. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the performance of the S-ICD sensing algorithm in patients hospitalized for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), before and after revascularization. METHODS: We performed a S-ICD automated screening on 75 patients, 21 hospitalized for STEMI, 23 for NSTE-ACS and 31 for CCS, before and after percutaneous revascularization, regardless their eligibility to ICD implantation. RESULTS: Patients did not differ in clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. Rates of screening pass were significantly lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (5% vs 56.7% vs 81% respectively, p < .0001). The viability of the primary vector was lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (33% vs 56% vs 71%, p .027 respectively). After revascularization, there were no more significant differences between groups. Pairing subjects at baseline and after revascularization, STEMI subjects percentages of screening success were respectively 5% and 81% (p < .001) and the rates of primary vector viability were 33% and 81% (p .002). STEMI was the only independent predictor of screening failure at multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 10.68 confidence interval 2.77-41.38, p = .001). CONCLUSION: The performance of the S-ICD and possible malfunction detections in the context of an acute ischemic event deserve further evaluation. Adequate patient selection and the development of dynamic device programming are warranted.

Left ventricular ejection fraction for the risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: friend or foe?

More than 450000 Americans die suddenly each year from sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. A correct identification of these patients is crucial for a rational clinical management, because the demonstrated effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) on the reduction of sudden cardiac death. Basing on the results of multiple clinical trials, left ventricular systolic function, measured as ejection fraction, is currently the only recommended tool to identify patients at higher risk of sudden death that would benefit from a prophylactic ICD. However, the systematic implementation of prophylactic ICD recommendations results in a substantial number of inappropriate ICD implantations, while failing to prevent the majority of sudden deaths occurring in the general population. That has been the case implementing arrhythmic risk stratification with a rough arrhythmic risk marker, such as ejection fraction, that lacks sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of sudden cardiac death. The aim of this viewpoint is to critically revise the value of ejection fraction in the identification of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death.

Intracardiac echocardiography in electrophysiology.

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a recent, invaluable tool which can provide real-time anatomical guidance in electrophysiological procedures. By inserting intravenously an ultrasound probe and advancing it into the heart, various different views can be obtained which allow to better visualize patient anatomy, to guide the placement of electrophysiological catheters, and to detect immediately procedural complications as they occur. In atrial fibrillation ablation, ICE proves particularly useful to achieve a safer trans-septal puncture (especially in the presence of anatomical anomalies of the interatrial septum) and to help to monitor the visualization of the mapping catheters (circular, high density), or the monitoring of the balloons catheter (Cryo, Laser) position. In ventricular tachycardia ablation, on the other hand, ICE allows for continuous correlation between electrophysiological and structural findings (such as wall motion anomalies or changes in echodensity), and helps to ensure correct catheter contact and to position it, particularly around delicate structures such as the aortic cusps. In any procedure, ICE is also useful to immediately detect procedural complications, such as thrombus formation along catheters, or pericardial effusion. Thanks to its real-time morphological information, ICE provides an ideal complement to simple fluoroscopy or to more complex electroanatomic mapping techniques and is set to gain a wider role in a broad range of electrophysiological procedures.

Rate-control or rhythm-control: where do we stand?

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained rhythm disturbance and its prevalence is increasing worldwide due to the progressive aging of the population. Current guidelines clearly depict the gold standard management of acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation but the best-long term approach for first or recurrent atrial fibrillation is still debated with regard to quality of life, risk of new hospitalizations, and possible disabling complications, such as thromboembolic stroke, major bleeds and death. Some authors propose that regaining sinus rhythm in all cases, thus re-establishing a physiologic cardiac function not requiring a prolonged antithrombotic therapy, avoids the threat of intracranial or extracranial haemorrhages due to Vitamin K antagonists or aspirin. On the contrary, advocates of a rate control approach with an accurate antithrombotic prophylaxis propose that such a strategy may avoid the risk of cardiovascular and non cardiovascular side effects related to antiarrhythmic drugs. This review aims to explore the state of our knowledge in order to summarize evidences and issues that need to be furthermore clarified.

Prolonged asystolia in a young athlete: a case of sinus arrest during REM sleep.

A young asymptomatic male athlete came to our laboratory to be enrolled in a research protocol on physical fatigue. Routine clinical and cardiological evaluations including echocardiogram were in the normal range. Several consecutive cardiopulmonary tests showed a fairly good tolerance to exercise, with no symptoms even when the effort was abruptly arrested. On the other hand, Holter ECG recordings showed long nocturnal sinus pauses. As he was absolutely asymptomatic and free from any structural heart disease, he underwent a follow-up with repeated Holter monitorings for one year. During this period he decided on his own to stop practising sports; in spite of this sharp reduction in his overall physical activity, consecutive Holter monitorings showed that the sinus pauses were progressively increasing in duration (up to 9.2 seconds). With the hypothesis of a malignant vagotonia, he underwent a tilt test; however, we could not elicit any pauses or symptoms. The pauses grew longer over time; a endocavitary electrophysiologic test was performed, which showed no evidence of disease. To rule out the hypothesis of a sleep apnoea syndrome, he also underwent a polysomnography, including EEG, eye movement electromyography, arterial blood oxygen saturation and thoracic impedance: no alterations were detected with the exception of the sinus pauses, which appeared to be strictly linked to REM sleep, as suggested by the concurrent increase in rapid eye movements and desynchronized EEG. We hence made a diagnosis of sinus arrest during REM sleep (SAdRS), a very uncommon disease belonging to the parasomnias. Pauses were then quantified for one month by implanting a ECG loop recorder. As the patient became more and more upset and worried, and the pauses increased to nearly 12 seconds, we decided to implant a pacemaker, which is the only therapeutic option established in the literature for patients with SAdRS.

Late occurrence of heart block after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the septal region: clinical follow-up and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: There are few data regarding the occurrence of delayed heart block at least 24 hours after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of AV nodal reentry or posteroseptal accessory pathways (APs). We investigated the late occurrence of heart block in this population, the clinical outcome, and whether findings at electrophysiologic study could have predicted its development. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two of 418 patients with AV nodal reentry undergoing RFCA using a posterior approach and 1 of 54 patients with RFCA of a posteroseptal AP developed late heart block. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal conduction before and after RFCA were normal. Patients received 12, 15, and 32 RFCA lesions, respectively, using a mean maximum power of 44 W. The RFCA sites were the posterior septum for posteroseptal AP and the posterior and mid-septum for patients with AV nodal reentry, with no His electrogram ever recorded at the ablation site. During RFCA, junctional tachycardia occurred with 1:1 VA conduction in the patient with a posteroseptal AP, but occasional intermittent single retrograde blocked complexes were present in both patients with AV nodal reentry. No rapid junctional tachycardia or >1 consecutive retrograde blocked complex was ever observed during RFCA. Persistent high-degree AV block with junctional escape developed 2 days after RFCA in the posteroseptal AP patient. A permanent pacemaker was implanted, and normal conduction was noted 16 days after RFCA. Both patients with AV nodal reentry complained of fatigue, mainly on exertion, 3 to 4 days after RFCA, and ECG-documented exercise-induced variable AV block was obtained. Because heart block resolved in our initial patient, a prolonged monitoring period was allowed. Symptoms disappeared at 13 and 8 days, and a follow-up treadmill test showed normal PR interval and no heart block. No recurrence of heart block has been seen in any of these three patients. CONCLUSION: Late unexpected heart block after RFCA of AV nodal reentry and posteroseptal AP is rare, often resolves uneventfully in 1 to 2 weeks, and no specific electrophysiologic findings predicted its occurrence. Prolonged clinical observation is preferable to immediate pacemaker implantation in such patients.

Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiological predictors of atrial fibrillation development in different cardiac substrates.

We performed a review of the current literature in order to evaluate clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic parameters predictive of atrial fibrillation development. Clinical parameters were obtained from two large observational studies (the Framingham heart study and the Cardiovascular health study). Different laboratoristic predictors were also reviewed: ECG-derived predictors, among which we separately evaluated those derived from the 12-lead surface ECG and those derived from the signal averaged P-wave, and other electrophysiologic predictors as atrial monophasic action potential analysis. We also evaluated the clinical value of these different parameters in atrial fibrillation in patients with no overt structural heart disease and in the most common clinical conditions known to be related to atrial fibrillation development such as hypertension, heart failure, cardiovascular surgery.

Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope. BACKGROUND: Induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope and structural heart disease is usually assigned diagnostic significance. However, the true frequency of subsequent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic medications is unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study, the incidence of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies for sustained ventricular arrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope (syncope group, n = 22) was compared with that of a control group of patients (n = 32) with clinically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were inducible in both groups and neither group received antiarrhythmic medications. All ICDs had stored electrograms or RR intervals. Clinical variables were similar between groups except that congestive cardiac failure was more common in the syncope group. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to first appropriate ICD therapy for syncope and control groups produced overlapping curves (p = 0.9), with 57 +/- 11% and 50 +/- 9%, respectively, receiving ICD therapy by one year. In both groups, the induced arrhythmia was significantly faster than spontaneous arrhythmias, but the cycle lengths of induced and spontaneous arrhythmias were positively correlated (R = 0.6, p < 0.0001). During follow-up, three cardiac transplantations and seven deaths occurred in the syncope group, and two transplantations and five deaths occurred in the control group (36-month survival without transplant 52 +/- 11% and 83 +/- 7%, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias occur commonly and at a similar rate to patients with documented sustained VT. Thus, electrophysiologic testing in unexplained syncope can identify those at risk of potentially life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, and aggressive treatment of these patients is warranted.

Electrograms for identification of the atrial ablation site during catheter ablation of accessory pathways.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of accessory pathways using radiofrequency current has been shown to be effective in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, by using either the ventricular or atrial approach. However, the unipolar electrogram criteria for identifying a successful ablation at the atrial site are not well established. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White were treated by delivering radiofrequency energy at the atrial site. Attempts were considered successful when ablation (disappearance of the delta wave) occurred in < 10 seconds. In eight patients with concealed pathway, the accessory pathway location was obtained by measuring the shortest V-A interval either during ventricular pacing or spontaneous or induced reciprocating tachycardia. In 92 patients both atrioventricular valve annuli were mapped during sinus rhythm, in order to identify the accessory pathway (K) potential before starting the ablation procedure. When a stable filtered (30-250 Hz) "unipolar" electrogram was recorded, the following time intervals were measured: (1) from the onset of the atrial to the onset of the K potential (A-K); (2) from the onset of the delta wave to the onset of the K potential (delta-K); and (3) from the onset of the K potential to the onset of the ventricular deflection (K-V). During unsuccessful versus successful attempts, A-K (51 +/- 11 ms vs 28 +/- 8 ms, P < 0.0001 for left pathways [LPs]; and 44 +/- 8 ms vs 31 +/- 8 ms, P < 0.02 for right pathways [RPs]) and delta-K intervals (2 +/- 9 ms vs -18 +/- 10 ms, P < 0.0001 for LPs; and 13 +/- 7 ms vs 5 +/- 8 ms, P < 0.02 ms for RPs) were significantly longer. CONCLUSIONS: Short A-K interval (< 40 ms), and a negative delta-K interval recorded from the catheter positioned in the atrium are strong predictors of successful ablation of LPs and RPs. Therefore, the identification of the K potential appears to be of paramount importance for positioning of the ablation catheter, followed by analysis of A-K and delta-K unipolar electrogram intervals. However, it appears that the mere recording of K potential is not, per se, predictive of successful outcome, but rather the A-K and delta-K interval.

[Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in supraventricular tachycardia in children: immediate results and mid-term follow-up]. / Ablazione transcatetere con radiofrequenza delle tachicardie sopraventricolari in età pediatrica: risultati immediati e di un follow-up a medio termine.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation of supraventricular tachycardias due to a reentry circuit in a group of closely followed-up pediatric patients. PATIENTS: Forty-six pediatric patients (mean age 12.6 years, range 3-18) underwent a total of 48 radiofrequency ablation procedures for reciprocating supraventricular tachycardia. Thirty-nine had an orthodromic reentry tachycardia, 6 an atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia and 1 a permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia. METHODS: To ablate the overt accessory pathways, the Kent potential (K) was identified and then the shortest A-K, and delta wave-K intervals were measured. The shortest V-A interval was identified for those concealed. For the left-sided accessory pathways, we used the retrograde transaortic approach in 10 procedures and the transseptal approach in 18. Atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia was ablated at the site where the slow-pathway electrogram was recorded. Follow-up clinical data, electrocardiogram, 24-hours Holter monitoring and transesophageal atrial stimulation were obtained and evaluated. RESULTS: Early: We performed a total of 48 procedures. Among 41 procedures performed in the 39 patients with accessory pathway, 38 were successful (92,6%). Mean fluoroscopy time was 31 +/- 18 min. For left sided accessory pathways, mean fluoroscopy time of procedures with retrograde approach was 45 +/- 10 min and with transseptal 23 +/- 12 min (p < 0.01). Ablation of slow-pathway in patients with intranodal reentry tachycardia was successful in 3/6 cases (50%). The patient with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia was successfully ablated. Late: All patients are alive and none was lost during the follow-up after a mean time of 12.9 months (range 5-33). Success at last follow-up was 100% in patients with an accessory pathway and 33% in patients with atrioventricular node reentry. In patient with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, the arrhythmia appeared again one month after the procedure, thus a second successful attempt was performed. COMPLICATIONS: Major complications (6,5%) including a right femoral vein thrombosis (one patient), an hematoma without pulse loss (one patient) and a non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show high efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in pediatric patients with accessory pathways. The risks are low at follow-up evaluation, but might be helpful a longer-term follow-up in order to evaluate the risk of a long fluoroscopy time and the arrhythmogenic effect of the scar.