Recognition of RNA branch point sequences by the KH domain of splicing factor 1 (mammalian branch point binding protein) in a splicing factor complex.

Mammalian splicing factor 1 (SF1; also mammalian branch point binding protein [mBBP]; hereafter SF1/mBBP) specifically recognizes the seven-nucleotide branch point sequence (BPS) located at 3' splice sites and participates in the assembly of early spliceosomal complexes. SF1/mBBP utilizes a "maxi-K homology" (maxi-KH) domain for recognition of the single-stranded BPS and requires a cooperative interaction with splicing factor U2AF65 bound to an adjacent polypyrimidine tract (PPT) for high-affinity binding. To investigate how the KH domain of SF1/mBBP recognizes the BPS in conjunction with U2AF and possibly other proteins, we constructed a transcriptional reporter system utilizing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat fusion proteins and examined the RNA-binding specificity of the complex using KH domain and RNA-binding site mutants. We first established that SF1/mBBP and U2AF cooperatively assemble in our reporter system at RNA sites composed of the BPS, PPT, and AG dinucleotide found at 3' splice sites, with endogenous proteins assembled along with the Tat fusions. We next found that the activities of the Tat fusion proteins on different BPS variants correlated well with the known splicing efficiencies of the variants, supporting a model in which the SF1/mBBP-BPS interaction helps determine splicing efficiency prior to the U2 snRNP-BPS interaction. Finally, the likely RNA-binding surface of the maxi-KH domain was identified by mutagenesis and appears similar to that used by "simple" KH domains, involving residues from two putative alpha helices, a highly conserved loop, and parts of a beta sheet. Using a homology model constructed from the cocrystal structure of a Nova KH domain-RNA complex (Lewis et al., Cell 100:323-332, 2000), we propose a plausible arrangement for SF1/mBBP-U2AF complexes assembled at 3' splice sites.

Coassembly of synthetic segments of shaker K+ channel within phospholipid membranes.

Increasing evidence suggests that membrane-embedded hydrophobic segments can interact within the phospholipid milieu of the membrane with varying degrees of specificity and thus contribute to the folding and oligomerization of proteins. We have used synthetic peptides corresponding to segments from the hydrophobic core of the Shaker potassium channel as a model system to study interactions between membrane-embedded segments. Three synthetic segments of the Shaker K+ channel, comprising the hydrophobic S2, S3, and S4 sequences, were used, and their secondary structure, their interactions with, and orientation within phospholipid membranes were examined. Secondary structure studies revealed that though S3 and S4 both adopt certain fractions of alpha-helical structures in membrane mimetic environments, the alpha-helical content of S3 is lower. Both S3 and S4 bind strongly to zwitterionic phospholipids, with partition coefficients in the order of 10(4) and 10(5) M-1. ATR-FTIR studies showed that while the S4 peptide is oriented parallel to the membrane surface, S3 tends to a more transmembranal orientation. Enzymatic cleavage experiments demonstrated that the presence of S3 induces some change in the proteolytic accessibility of the S4 segment. Resonance energy transfer measurements, done in high lipid/peptide molar ratios, revealed that S3 and S4 cannot self-associate in zwitterionic phospholipid vesicles but can associate with each other and with the S2 segment of the channel. Furthermore, S3 does not interact with the homologous S4 region from the first repeat of the eel sodium channel, demonstrating specificity in the interactions. These results are in line with data indicating that functionally important interactions indeed exist between the negatively charged S2 and S3 regions and the positively charged S4 region [Papazian, D. M., et al (1995) Neuron 14, 1293-1301; Planells-Cases, R., et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 9422-9426]. From a broader point of view, these results provide further support to the notion that interactions (either specific or nonspecific) may exist between transmembrane segments of integral membrane proteins and therefore can contribute to their assembly and organization.