ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Studies examining differences in US healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated healthcare costs between collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) and fasciectomy for Dupuytren contracture (DC) are limited. This study evaluated US HCRU and direct healthcare cost for the treatment of DC in privately insured patients using insurance claims. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from large nationwide insurance claims databases; it included individuals diagnosed with DC between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2017, who were adults at index date (date of first treatment: CCH or fasciectomy). Participants had continuous health plan coverage 24 months pre-index and 12 months post-index date. All-cause and DC-related HCRU and healthcare costs from the payers' perspective were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts. Generalized linear models assessed factors associated with all-cause total healthcare costs. RESULTS: Of 83,983 patients diagnosed with DC, 1932 adults receiving fasciectomy and 953 adults receiving CCH were included. The mean ± standard deviation total all-cause healthcare cost was significantly lower with CCH than with fasciectomy (US$11,897 ± US$14,633 versus US$15,528 ± US$22,254, respectively; P<0.001). After propensity score matching, 702 and 999 patients remained in the CCH and fasciectomy cohorts, respectively. In this analysis, all-cause and DC-related total costs were significantly lower in the CCH cohort versus the fasciectomy cohort (all-cause: US$11,044 ± US$12,856 versus US$12,912 ± US$19,237, respectively, P=0.02; DC-specific: US$3417 ± US$3671 versus US$5800 ± US$4985, P<0.001), mainly due to the lower frequency of outpatient visits. CCH treatment and the use of a consumer-driven healthcare plan were associated with lower healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: Based on matched cohort data, adjusted 1-year healthcare costs for CCH-treated individuals were significantly lower compared with costs for fasciectomy-treated individuals.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chronic pain treatment imposes a substantial economic burden on US society. Treatment costs may vary across subgroups of patients with different types of pain. The aim of our study was to compare healthcare costs (HC) and resource utilization in musculoskeletal (MP), neuropathic (NP), and cancer pain (CaP) patients treated with long-acting opioids (LAO), using real-world evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared total HC and resource utilization in subgroups of chronic pain patients (MP, NP or CaP) treated with three LAO alternatives: morphine-sulfate extended-release (MsER), oxycodone ER (OxnER) and tapentadol ER (TapER). Retrospective claims data were analyzed in the IBM Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims Database (October 2012 through March 2016). All patients were continuously health plan enrolled for at least 12 months before the index date (ï¬rst LAO prescription date) and during the LAO-treatment period. The cohorts were propensity-score matched. RESULTS: A total of 2824 TapER-treated patients were matched to 16,716 OxnER-treated patients, while 2827 TapER patients were matched to 16,817 MsER patients. The average monthly total HC were lower in the TapER than in the OxnER cohort ($2510 vs. $3720, p<0.001), reï¬ecting significantly lower outpatient, inpatient and emergency department visit rates in the TapER cohort. Similarly, the TapER cohort exhibited a lower average monthly total HC ($2520 vs. $2900, p<0.05) than MsER cohort, with signiï¬cantly fewer inpatient and outpatient visits in the TapER cohort. TapER demonstrated signiï¬cantly lower total HC than OxnER in patients with NP and MP, and similar to OxnER in CaP patients. TapER costs were similar to MsER costs in all pain-type subpopulations. CONCLUSION: Based on real-world evidence, the TapER treatment for chronic pain was associated with signiï¬cantly lower HC compared with MsER or OxnER. When categorized by type of pain, TapER remained a less costly strategy in comparison with OxnER for MP and NP.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with reproductive and metabolic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to analyse risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in PCOS, to define individual risk factors and assess their ability to predict risk. METHODS: Fifty-four young women with PCOS (22 obese and 32 normal weight) were compared to 46 respective controls (17 obese and 29 normal weight). Anthropometric parameters, lipid status parameters, inflammation markers, concentrations of glucose, transaminases, sex and anterior pituitary hormones, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and androgens were measured. Cardiovascular Risk Score (CVRS), indices for identifying Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and the Index of Central Obesity (ICO) were calculated. RESULTS: Significantly higher CVRS values (p<0.05) were found in obese PCOS women compared to normal weight control and normal weight PCOS groups. Anthropometric parameters, lipid status parameters and fibrinogen (p<0.001, p<0.01) were higher in women with higher CVRS. The most significant CVRS predictors in all PCOS women were SHBG, androstenedione, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS). ICO and all NAFLD indices exhibited significant positive correlation with CVRS and a model consisting of these indices provided good diagnostic accuracy (AUC>0.8) in identifying patients with increased cardiovascular risk (CVR). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a higher risk for developing CVD than PCOS alone. Anthropometric parameters, lipid parameters, fibrinogen, NAFLD indices and ICO increase CVR in PCOS women. For the prediction of CVR in PCOS, we suggest a combination of NAFLD indices and ICO.
